Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 629–642 | Cite as

Seaweed compost for agricultural crop production

  • Andrew J. ColeEmail author
  • David A. Roberts
  • Alan L. Garside
  • Rocky de Nys
  • Nicholas A. Paul
Article

Abstract

This study manipulated the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C:N) of seaweed composts by varying the proportion of high N green seaweed (Ulva ohnoi) and high C sugarcane bagasse to assess their quality and suitability for use in agricultural crop production. Seaweed-bagasse mixes that had an initial C:N ratio greater than 18:1 (up to 50:1) could be transformed into a mature compost within 16 weeks. However, only composts with a high seaweed content and therefore low initial C:N (18 and 22:1) supported a consistently high rate of plant growth, even at low application rates. Sugarcane grown in these high seaweed composts had a 7-fold higher total above-ground biomass than low seaweed composts and a 4-fold higher total above-ground biomass than sugarcane grown in commercial compost that did not contain seaweed. Overall, the optimal initial C:N ratio for seaweed-based compost was 22:1 which corresponds to 82 % seaweed on a fresh weight basis. This ratio will produce a high quality mature compost whilst also ensuring that a high proportion of the nitrogen (>90 %) in the Ulva biomass is retained through the composting process.

Keywords

Macroalgae Phosphorous Nitrogen Agriculture Salt Electrical conductivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is part of the MBD Energy Research and Development programme for Biological Carbon Capture and Storage. The project is supported by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) and the Advanced Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre (AMCRC) funded through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Scheme. We thank Jonathon Moorhead, Tom Mannering, Lewis Anderson and Giovani Del Frari for assistance with experiments and the Burdekin Productivity Services for supplying the sugarcane stalks.

Supplementary material

10811_2015_544_Fig5_ESM.gif (60 kb)
Supplementary A

The relationship between the height (mm) and dry weight (g) of 78 recently sprouted sugarcane seedlings that ranged in height from 60–300 (mm). This regression equation, y = 0.001x + 0.61, was used to account for the initial biomass of the cane seedlings when they were transplanted into the compost treatments. This enabled an accurate calculation of the total above-ground biomass production of sugarcane in each of the compost treatments. (GIF 59 kb)

10811_2015_544_MOESM1_ESM.eps (919 kb)
High Resolution Image (EPS 918 kb)
10811_2015_544_Fig6_ESM.jpg (1.4 mb)
Supplementary B

The relative differences in root growth from sugarcane plants grown in seven seaweed-based composts and four compost / sand mixes (100, 75, 50 and 25% compost). In these seaweed-based composts the seaweed was included in varying proportions to manipulate the initial carbon to nitrogen ratio of the compost material. These ratios from left to right are 18:1, 22:1, 26:1, 30:1 34:1, 40:1 and 50:1. King Brown (KB) is a commercially available compost that contains no seaweed and was used as a positive control. King brown compost had an initial C:N ratio of 28:1 and a final C:N ratio of 15:1. As the initial C:N ratio of the compost increases the size of the root mass decreases (left to right). Likewise as the proportion of compost in the pot increases (bottom to top) the root mass also increases. The composts that had an initial C:N ratio of 18 and 22:1 have considerably more root growth, even when these composts are mixed with large proportions of sand. (JPEG 1459 kb)

10811_2015_544_Fig7_ESM.gif (21 kb)
Supplementary C

Changes in a) pH b) salinity and c) electrical conductivity of each of the seven seaweed-based composts after being added to pots, wet to water holding capacity with freshwater and left to stabilise for seven days. (GIF 20 kb)

10811_2015_544_MOESM2_ESM.eps (745 kb)
High Resolution Image (EPS 744 kb)
10811_2015_544_MOESM3_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary D PERMANOVA output table and the relative effect size (as % variance explained: η 2) for each of the main effects and interactions between the initial C:N ratio of the composts and the proportion of compost added to each pot on the a) stem width b) stem length c) number of stalks per plant and d) the total above-ground biomass of sugarcane plants. (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. Alloway BJ, Graham RD, Stacey SP (2008) Micronutrient deficiencies in Australian field crops. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Micronutrient deficiencies in global crop production. Springer, Netherlands, pp 63–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austr Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarcke KR (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson DM, Cembella AD, Hallegraeff GM (2012) Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annu Rev Mar Sci 4:143–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arienzo M, Christen EW, Jayawardane NS, Quayle WC (2012) The relative effects of sodium and potassium on soil hydraulic conductivity and implications for winery wastewater management. Geoderma 173–174:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armour J, Nelson P, Daniells J, Rasiah V, Inman-Bamber N (2013) Nitrogen leaching from the root zone of sugarcane and bananas in the humid tropics of Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrington S, Choinière D, Trigui M, Knight W (2002) Effect of carbon source on compost nitrogen and carbon losses. Bioresour Technol 83:189–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernal MP, Alburquerque JA, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresour Technol 100:5444–5453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop P, Godfrey C (1983) Nitrogen transformations during sludge composting. Biocycle 24:34–39Google Scholar
  10. Bolton J, Robertson-Andersson D, Shuuluka D, Kandjengo L (2009) Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in integrated systems as a commercial crop for abalone feed in South Africa: a SWOT analysis. J Appl Phycol 21:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pérez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP, Moral R (2008) Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72:551–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW (2014) Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants Plant Soil 383:1–39Google Scholar
  13. Carter MR (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 823ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Castine SA, McKinnon AD, Paul NA, Trott LA, de Nys R (2013) Wastewater treatment for land-based aquaculture: improvements and value-adding alternatives in model systems from Australia. Aquac Environ Interactions 4:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerqueira DA, Meireles CS (2007) Optimization of sugarcane bagasse cellulose acetylation. Carbohydr Polym 69:579–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crab R, Avnimelech Y, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W (2007) Nitrogen removal techniques in aquaculture for a sustainable production. Aquaculture 270:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Craigie JS (2011) Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. J Appl Phycol 23:371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuomo V, Perretti A, Palomba I, Verde A, Cuomo A (1995) Utilisation of Ulva rigida biomass in the Venice Lagoon (Italy): biotransformation in compost. J Appl Phycol 7:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Nys R, Jameson P, Brown M (1991) The influence of cytokinins on the growth of Macrocystis pyrifera. Bot Mar 34:465–468Google Scholar
  20. Evans H (1959) Elements other than nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus in the mineral nutrition of sugar cane. In: Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. pp 473–508Google Scholar
  21. Eyras MC, Rostagno CM, Defossé GE (1998) Biological evaluation of seaweed composting. Compost Sci Util 6:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eyras M, Defosse G, Dellatorre F (2008) Seaweed compost as an amendment for horticultural soils in Patagonia, Argentina. Compost Sci Util 16:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO (2014) The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2014. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Flavel TC, Murphy DV (2006) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates after application of organic amendments to soil. J Environ Qual 35:183–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Golabi MH, Denney M, Iyekar C (2007) Value of composted organic wastes as an alternative to synthetic fertilizers for soil quality improvement and increased yield. Compost Sci Util 15:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Han W, Clarke W, Pratt S (2014) Composting of waste algae: a review. Waste Manag 34:1148–1155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harada Y, Inoko A, Tadaki M, Izawa T (1981) Maturing process of city refuse compost during piling. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 27:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hargreaves JC, Adl MS, Warman PR (2008) A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson C, Preston N, Thompson PJ, Burford M (2003) Nitrogen budget and effluent nitrogen components at an intensive shrimp farm. Aquaculture 218:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khan MA, Ansari R, Ali H, Gul B, Nielsen BL (2009) Panicum turgidum, a potentially sustainable cattle feed alternative to maize for saline areas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:542–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirkby EA (2012) Introduction, definition and classification of nutrients. In: Marschner P (ed) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Boston, pp 3–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ko HJ, Kim KY, Kim HT, Kim CN, Umeda M (2008) Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure. Waste Manag 28:813–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, Horton R, Karlen D (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008) Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol Evol 23:95–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lourenço SO, Barbarino E, De‐Paula JC, Pereira LOS, Marquez UML (2002) Amino acid composition, protein content and calculation of nitrogen‐to‐protein conversion factors for 19 tropical seaweeds. Phycol Res 50:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mata L, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2010) A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida. J Appl Phycol 22:639–644.Google Scholar
  37. Mathur S, Owen G, Dinel H, Schnitzer M (1993) Determination of compost biomaturity. I. Literature review. Biol Agric Hortic 10:65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazé J, Morand P, Potoky P (1993) Stabilisation of ‘Green tides’ Ulva by a method of composting with a view to pollution limitation. J Appl Phycol 5:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Michalak I, Chojnacka K (2013) Algal compost—toward sustainable fertilization. Rev Inorg Chem 33:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohee R, Mudhoo A, Peryagh C, Somaroo GD (2013) Composting of washed Ulva reticulata seaweed: process parameter variations and compost quality. Int J Env Waste Manag 12:89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Msuya F, Neori A (2008) Effect of water aeration and nutrient load level on biomass yield, N uptake and protein content of the seaweed Ulva lactuca cultured in seawater tanks. J Appl Phycol 20:1021–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Naidu R, Rengasamy P (1993) Ion interactions and constraints to plant nutrition in Australian sodic soils. Soil Res 31:801–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neori A, Cohen I, Gordin H (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. II. Growth rate, yield and C:N ratio. Bot Mar 34:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neori A, Msuya FE, Shauli L, Schuenhoff A, Kopel F, Shpigel M (2003) A novel three-stage seaweed (Ulva lactuca) biofilter design for integrated mariculture. J Appl Phycol 15:543–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ogunwande G, Osunade J, Adekalu K, Ogunjimi L (2008) Nitrogen loss in chicken litter compost as affected by carbon to nitrogen ratio and turning frequency. Bioresour Technol 99:7495–7503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Paredes C, Roig A, Bernal M, Sánchez-Monedero M, Cegarra J (2000) Evolution of organic matter and nitrogen during co-composting of olive mill wastewater with solid organic wastes. Biol Fertil Soils 32:222–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Qadir M, Oster JD (2004) Crop and irrigation management strategies for saline-sodic soils and waters aimed at environmentally sustainable agriculture. Sci Total Environ 323:1–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Quilty J, Cattle S (2011) Use and understanding of organic amendments in Australian agriculture: a review. Soil Res 49:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raun WR, Johnson GV (1999) Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agron J 91:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rengasamy P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Anim Prod Sci 42:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sánchez-Monedero M, Roig A, Paredes C, Bernal M (2001) Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rutgers system and its effects on pH, EC and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresour Technol 78:301–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Stirk WA, Van Staden J (2014) Plant growth regulators in seaweeds: occurrence, regulation and functions. In: Bourgougnon N (ed) Sea plants. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stirk WA, Novák O, Hradecká V, Pĕnčík A, Rolčík J, Strnad M, Van Staden J (2009) Endogenous cytokinins, auxins and abscisic acid in Ulva fasciata (Chlorophyta) and Dictyota humifusa (Phaeophyta): towards understanding their biosynthesis and homoeostasis. Eur J Phycol 44:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stirk WA, Tarkowská D, Turečová V, Strnad M, Van Staden J (2014) Abscisic acid, gibberellins and brassinosteroids in Kelpak®, a commercial seaweed extract made from Ecklonia maxima. J Appl Phycol 26:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thorburn PJ, Wilkinson SN (2013) Conceptual frameworks for estimating the water quality benefits of improved agricultural management practices in large catchments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:192–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tognetti C, Mazzarino MJ, Laos F (2007) Improving the quality of municipal organic waste compost. Bioresour Technol 98:1067–1076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang P, Changa C, Watson M, Dick W, Chen Y, Hoitink H (2004) Maturity indices for composted dairy and pig manures. Soil Biol Biochem 36:767–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winberg P, de Mestre C, Willis S (2013) Evaluating Microdictyon umbilicatum bloom biomass as a compost conditioner for Australian, native coastal plants, Rhagodia candoleana and Banksia integrifolia. Compost Sci Util 21:64–74Google Scholar
  61. Wosnitza TMA, Barrantes JG (2006) Utilization of seaweed Ulva sp. in Paracas Bay (Peru): experimenting with compost. J Appl Phycol 18:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang L, Sun X (2014) Changes in physical, chemical, and microbiological properties during the two-stage co-composting of green waste with spent mushroom compost and biochar. Bioresour Technol 171:274–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Cole
    • 1
    Email author
  • David A. Roberts
    • 1
  • Alan L. Garside
    • 2
  • Rocky de Nys
    • 1
  • Nicholas A. Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.MACRO – the Centre for Macroalgal Resources and BiotechnologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  2. 2.College of Marine and Environmental SciencesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations