Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 1561–1570 | Cite as

Growth and reproductive responses of the conchocelis phase of Pyropia hollenbergii (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) to light and temperature

  • Juan Manuel López-Vivas
  • Rafael Riosmena-Rodríguez
  • Antonio Alfredo Jiménez-González de la Llave
  • Isaí Pacheco-Ruíz
  • Charles Yarish
Article

Abstract

Effects of light and temperature on conchocelis growth of Pyropia hollenbergii were evaluated with the hypothesis that conchocelis phase is most adapted to environmental extremes as compared to the gametophyte phase. Growth rates were measured weekly over a 3-month experimental period. Our results have shown that the best growth rate was 6.4 to 7.5 % area day−1 at 25 °C, at photon fluence rates between 50 and 150 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and at a photoperiod of 15:9 h L: D. The upper temperature tolerance limit of Py. hollenbergii was at 33 °C at a photon fluence rate between 10 and 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and photoperiods of 9:15 and 12:12 h L:D. At a temperature of 5 °C, growth was inhibited (<0.5 % area day−1), but no mortality was observed. Archeospores were detected at 5–35 °C. Maximum archeospore production was observed at 5–10 °C, 50–150 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and at 9:15 h L:D. The highest number of conchosporangia was detected at 15–20 °C, 100–150 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and at 15:9 h L:D. The conchocelis phase of Py. hollenbergii is the critical perennating phase and is adapted to survive the highest temperatures in its habitat in the Gulf of California. The monospore and conchosporangium production is controlled by the combination of the temperatures and photon fluence rates.

Keywords

Conchocelis Growth rates Photon fluence rates Pyropia hollenbergii Reproduction survival Thermal tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

López-Vivas, J.M. acknowledges the support of CONACYT scholarship (157780) for PhD studies. This study was supported by the Mexican Council for the Sciences and Technology (CONACYT-50173Q) and the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC-0572). We thank the support of grants to Charles Yarish from the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program and the National Marine Aquaculture Initiative (NOAA, U.S. DOC) and US-AID, TIES program between the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California and the University of Connecticut (UABC-UCONN). Thanks to Alberto Gálvez T. and Biology students at UABC and personnel from UABCS herbarium and UCONN Laboratory for their technical assistance and support during the field and laboratory work.

References

  1. Álvarez-Borrego S (2010) Physical, chemical, and biological oceanography of the Gulf of California. In: Brusca RC (ed) The Gulf of California: biodiversity and conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 24–48Google Scholar
  2. Andersen RA (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. Ávila M, Santelices B, McLachlan J (1986) Photoperiod and temperature regulation of the life history of Porphyra columbina (Rhodophyta, Bangiales) from central Chile. Can J Bot 64:1867–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanco-Betancourt R, Pacheco-Ruíz I, Guzmán-Calderón JM, Zertuche-González JA, Chee-Barragan A, Martínez-Díaz de León A, Gálvez-Telles A, López-Vivas JM (2004) Base de datos de la temperatura del agua de mar en seis bahías de la costa noroccidental del Golfo de California, México. Reporte Tecnico 2004(1): 1–35 Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas- UABC, http://iio.ens.uabc.mx/Publicaciones/Reportes_tecnicos/reporte-tecnico-2004-1.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2010
  5. Cordero PAJ (1974) Phycological observations I. Genus Porphyra of the Philippines, its species and their occurrences. Bull Jpn Soc Phycol 22:134–142Google Scholar
  6. Dawson EY (1953) Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico. Part 1. Bangiales to Corallinaceae subf. Corallinoideae. Allan Hancock Pac Exp 17:1–239Google Scholar
  7. Hollenberg GJ (1958) Phycological notes II. Bull Torrey Bot Club 85:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Holmes MJ, Brodie J (2004) Morphology, seasonal phenology and observations on some aspects of the life history in culture of Porphyra dioica (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Devon, UK. Phycologia 43:176–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Israel A, Katz S, Dubinsky Z, Merrill JE, Friedlander M (1999) Photosynthetic inorganic carbon utilization and growth of Porphyra linearis (Rhodophyta). J Appl Phycol 11:447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson ME, Ledesma-Vasquez J (2009) Atlas of coastal ecosystems in the western Gulf of California. The University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  11. Kapraun DF, Lemus AJ (1987) Field and culture studies of Porphyra spiralis var. amplifolia Oliveira Filho et Coll (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Isla de Margarita, Venezuela. Bot Mar 30:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz S, Kizner Z, Dubinsky Z, Friedlander M (2000) Responses of Porphyra linearis (Rhodophyta) to environmental factors under controlled culture conditions. J Appl Phycol 12:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim N-G (1999) Culture studies of Porphyra dentata and P. pseudolinearis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta), two dioecious species from Korea. Hydrobiologia 398/399:127–135Google Scholar
  14. Kim DH, Notoya M (2001) Life history of Porphyra koreana (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Korea in culture. Proc Intl Seaweed Symp 17:435–442Google Scholar
  15. Krishnamurthy V (1972) A revision of the species of the algal Genus Porphyra occurring on the Pacific Coast of North America. Pac Sci 26:24–49Google Scholar
  16. Kurogi M (1972) Systematics of Porphyra in Japan. In: Abbott IA, Kurogi M (eds) Contributions to the systematics of benthic marine algae of the North Pacific. Japanese Society of Phycology, Japan, pp 167–185Google Scholar
  17. Lewin J (1966) Silicon metabolism in diatoms. V. Germanium dioxide, a specific inhibitor of diatom growth. Phycologia 6:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu S, Yarish C (2011) Interaction of photoperiod and temperature in the development of conchocelis of Porphyra purpurea (Rhodophyta:Bangiales). J Appl Phycol 23:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notoya M, Nagaura K (1998) Life history and growth of the epiphytic thallus of Porphyra lacerata (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in culture. Algae 13:207–211Google Scholar
  20. Pacheco-Ruíz I (1999) Historia de vida de Chondracanthus squarrulosus (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) en la costa noroeste del Golfo de California. PhD, dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada, México,123 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Pereira R, Yarish C (2010) The role of Porphyra in sustainable culture systems: physiology and applications. In: Israel A, Einav R (eds) Role of seaweeds in a globally changing environment. Springer, London, pp 339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pereira R, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2004) Field and culture studies of the life history of Porphyra dioica (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from Portugal. Phycologia 43:756–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira R, Kraemer GP, Yarish C, Sousa-Pinto I (2008) Nitrogen uptake by gametophytes of Porphyra dioica (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) under controlled-culture conditions. Eur J Phycol 43:107–118Google Scholar
  24. Provasoli L (1968) Media and prospects for the cultivation of marine algae. In: Watanabe A, Hattori A (eds) Cultures and collections of algae. Jap Soc Plant Physiol, Hakone, Japan, pp 63–75Google Scholar
  25. Sahoo DB, Baweja P, Kushwah N (2006) Developmental studies in Porphyra vietnamensis: a high-temperature resistant species from the Indian Coast. J Appl Phycol 18:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sidirelli-Wolff M (1992) The influence of temperature, irradiance and photoperiod on the reproductive life history of Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in laboratory culture. Bot Mar 35:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SigmaStat (2006) Statistical software. Version 3.5, Systat Software, IncGoogle Scholar
  28. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman & Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Stekoll SM, Lin R, Lindstrom SC (1999) Porphyra cultivation in Alaska: conchocelis growth of three indigenous species. Hydrobiologia 398/399:291–297Google Scholar
  30. Sutherland JE, Lindstrom SC, Nelson WA, Brodie J, Lynch MDJ, Huwang MS, Choi H-G, Norio-Kikuchi MM, Oliveira MC, Farr T, Neefus CD, Mols-Mortensen A, Milstein D, Müller KM (2011) A new look at an ancient order: generic revision of the Bangiales (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 47:1131–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanaka T (1952) The systematic study of the Japanese Protoflorideae. Mem Fac Fish Kagoshima Univ 2:1–92Google Scholar
  32. Varela-Álvarez E, Stengel DB, Guiry MD (2004) The use of image processing in assessing conchocelis growth and conchospore production in Porphyra linearis. Phycologia 43:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waaland JR, Dickson LG, Duffield CS (1990) Conchospore production and seasonal occurrence of some Porphyra species (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in Washington State. Hydrobiologia 204/205:453–459Google Scholar
  34. Yarish C, Lee KW, Edwards P (1979) Short communication. An improved apparatus for the culture under varying regimes of temperature and light intensity. Bot Mar 22:395–397Google Scholar
  35. Yarish C, Breeman AM, Van den Hoek C (1984) Temperature, light, and photoperiod responses of some Northeast American and West European endemic rhodophytes in relation to their geographic distribution. Helgol Meeresunters 38:273–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yarish C, Kirkman H, Lüning K (1987) Lethal exposure times and preconditioning to upper temperature limits of some temperate North Atlantic red algae. Helgol Meeresunters 41:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Jersey, Prentice Hall NewGoogle Scholar
  38. Zertuche-González JA (1989) Macroalgas y el desarrollo de su cultivo. In: de la Rosa-Vélez J, González-Farias F (eds) Temas de Oceanografía Biológica en México. UABC, México, pp 319–337Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Manuel López-Vivas
    • 1
  • Rafael Riosmena-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Antonio Alfredo Jiménez-González de la Llave
    • 1
  • Isaí Pacheco-Ruíz
    • 2
  • Charles Yarish
    • 3
  1. 1.Programa de Investigación en Botánica Marina, Departamento Académico de Biología MarinaUniversidad Autónoma de Baja California SurLa PazMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigaciones OceanológicasUniversidad Autónoma de Baja CaliforniaEnsenadaMexico
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStamfordUSA

Personalised recommendations