Antenna size reduction as a strategy to increase biomass productivity: a great potential not yet realized
- 1.1k Downloads
A major limitation in achieving high photosynthetic efficiency in microalgae mass cultures is the fact that the intensity of direct sunlight greatly exceeds the photosynthetic capacity of the cells. Due to the high pigment content of algal cells, the light absorption rate surpasses the much slower conversion rate to biochemical energy. The excess of light energy is predominantly dissipated as heat, decreasing the light use efficiency of the culture. Algae with a truncated antenna system could substantially increase biomass productivity of mass cultures because oversaturation of the photosystems and concomitant dissipation of light energy are minimized. In this study, we measured the areal biomass productivity of wild-type strain cultures and four promising antenna size mutant cultures of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This was performed under simulated mass culture conditions. The strains were cultivated in turbidostat controlled lab-scale panel photobioreactors at an incident light intensity of 1500 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The mutant cultures did not exhibit the expected higher productivity. The greatest mutant culture productivity values were approximate to those of the wild-type productivity of 1.9 g m−2 h−1. The high sensitivity to abrupt light shifts indicated that the mutant cultures experienced reduced fitness and higher susceptibility to photodamage. This can possibly be explained by impaired photoprotection mechanisms induced by the antenna complex alterations, or by unintended side effects of the genetic modifications. Still, if these effects could be eliminated, the principle of antenna size reduction is a promising strategy to increase productivity. Selection criteria for the future creation of antenna size mutants should, therefore, include tolerance to high light conditions.
KeywordsChlamydomonas reinhardtii Areal biomass productivity Photosynthetic efficiency Antenna size mutants Biomass yield on light energy
This work is part of the research programme of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM) which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This project was conducted within the research programme of BioSolar Cells, co-financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs.
- Bonente G, Formighieri C, Mantelli M, Catalanotti C, Giuliano G, Morosinotto T, Bassi R (2011) Mutagenesis and phenotypic selection as a strategy toward domestication of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains for improved performance in photobioreactors. Photosynth Res 108:107–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dubinsky Z, Falkowski PG, Wyman K (1986) Light harvesting and utilization by phytoplankton. Plant Cell Physiol 27:1335–1349Google Scholar
- Dye DJ (2010) Spatial light dilution as a technique for conversion of solar energy to algal biomass. Dissertation, Utah State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Grewe S, Ballottari M, Alcocer M, D’Andrea C, Blifernez-Klassen O, Hankamer B, Mussgnug JH, Bassi R, Kruse O (2014) Light-harvesting complex protein LHCBM9 is critical for photosystem II activity and hydrogen production in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell 26:1598–1611CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hutner S, Provasoli L, Schatz A, Haskins C (1950) Some approaches to the study of the role of metals in the metabolism of microorganisms. Proc Am Philos Soc 94:152–170Google Scholar
- Nakajima Y, Ueda R (1998) Improvement of photosynthesis in dense microalgal suspension by reduction of light harvesting pigments. J Appl Phycol 9:503–510Google Scholar
- Olive J, Wollman F-A, Bennoun P, Recouvreur M (1981) Ultrastructure of thylakoid membranes in C. reinhardtii: evidence for variations in the partition coefficient of the light-harvesting complex-containing particles upon membrane fracture. Arch Biochem Biophys 208:456–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takache H, Christophe G, Cornet JF, Pruvost J (2010) Experimental and theoretical assessment of maximum productivities for the microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in two different geometries of photobioreactors. Biotechnol Progr 26:431–440Google Scholar
- Tanaka R, Tanaka A (2000) Chlorophyll b is not just an accessory pigment but a regulator of the photosynthetic antenna. Porphyrins 9:240–245Google Scholar