Gracilaria waste biomass (sampah rumput laut) as a bioresource for selenium biosorption
- 458 Downloads
Iron-based sorbents (IBS) are a promising tool for the removal of toxic metalloids, in particular, selenium (Se), from mining waste water. However, a barrier to the application of IBS is the absence of a sustainable and cost-effective substrate for their production. We demonstrate that IBS can be produced from the waste biomass that remains after the commercial extraction of agar from farmed seaweed (Gracilaria; Rhodophyta). The biosorbent is most effective when the waste Gracilaria biomass is treated with a ferric solution, then converted to biochar through slow pyrolysis. The resulting IBS is capable of binding both selenite (SeIV) and selenate (SeVI) from waste water. The rate of selenate (SeVI) biosorption, the predominant and most intractable form of Se in industrial waste water, is minimally affected by temperature. Similarly, the capacity of the biosorbent for Se (q max) is unaffected by pH. The q max values for the optimised biosorbent range from 2.60 to 2.72 mg SeVI g−1 biochar between pH 2.5 and 8.0. Gracilaria waste is a sustainable substrate for IBS production and can be used to treat a costly waste problem. The use of Gracilaria waste as a substrate for waste water treatment could simultaneously improve the sustainability and profitability of seaweed farming by valorizing a low-value waste stream.
KeywordsSelenium Biosorption Gracilaria Biochar
We thank Charlotte Johansson for assistance with the laboratory experiments and Tony Forsyth for assistance in preparing the biochar. This research is part of the MBD Energy Research and Development programme for Biological Carbon Capture and Storage. This project is supported by the Advanced Manufacturing Cooperative Research Centre (AMCRC), funded through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Scheme, and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA). SAD was supported by a grant from the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).
- Bulgariu D, Bulgariu L (2012) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of heavy metal ions biosorption on green algae waste biomass. Bioresour Technol 103:489–493Google Scholar
- Chapman PM, Adams WJ, Brooks ML, Delos CG, Luoma SN, Maher WA, Ohlendorf HM, Presser TS, Shaw PD (2009) Ecological assessment of selenium in the aquatic environment: summary of a SETAC Pellston Workshop. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, PensacolaGoogle Scholar
- FAO (2012) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Joseph S, Peacocke C, Lehmann J, Munroe P (2009) Developing biochar classification and test methods. Earthscan, Sterling, pp 249–258Google Scholar
- Kidgell JT, de Nys R, Hu Y, Paul NA, Roberts DA (in press). Bioremediation of a complex industrial effluent by biosorbents derived from freshwater macroalgae. PLOS One. Accepted 26.03.2014.Google Scholar
- Mane PC, Bhosle AB (2012) Bioremoval of some metals by living algae Spirogyra sp. and Spirullina sp. from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Res 6:571–576Google Scholar
- Roberts DA, Paul NA, De Nys R (2013) Biosorbent and methods of use. Provisional Australian patent AU2013902101Google Scholar
- Torres J, Pintos V, Gonzatto L, Domínguez S, Kremer C, Kremer E (2011) Selenium chemical speciation in natural waters: protonation and complexation behavior of selenite and selenate in the presence of environmentally relevant cations. Chem Geol 288:32–38Google Scholar
- USEPA (2001) Selenium treatment/removal alternatives demonstration project. EPA/600/R-01/077. United States Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
- Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar