Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1957–1961 | Cite as

Comparison of agarophytes (Gelidium, Gracilaria, and Gracilariopsis) as potential resources for bioethanol production

  • Maria Dyah Nur Meinita
  • Bintang Marhaeni
  • Tjahjo Winanto
  • Gwi-Taek Jeong
  • Mohammed Nurul Absar Khan
  • Yong-Ki HongEmail author


This study explores the possibility of producing ethanol using the acid hydrolysate of three abundant agar-containing red seaweeds (agarophytes): Gelidium amansii, Gracilaria tenuistipitata, and Gracilariopsis chorda. The main component in the seaweed samples was agar, which ranged from 20 to 51 % (g g−1 dry weight). After optimizing acid hydrolysis, 100 g of seaweed was hydrolyzed at 130 °C for 15 min with 0.2 M H2SO4. Then, 120 mL of a 1:2 mixture of the hydrolysate broth and basal medium was fermented in a 200-mL bottle at 30 °C for 96 h. Of the three seaweeds, G. amansii had the best ethanol yield, producing 0.23 g g−1 of galactose or 45 % of the theoretical yield. This yield increased to 60 % after detoxification of the hydrolysate with activated carbon.


Acid hydrolysis Agarophytes Bioethanol Gelidium Gracilaria Gracilariopsis 



This research was supported by a grant from the Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Korea. We are grateful for a postdoctoral fellowship from the Pukyong National University (MNAK) and the Brain Busan 21 program for graduate support. We thank to the Jenderal Soedirman University (UNSOED), Indonesia, for the collaboration research (Riset Unggulan UNSOED).


  1. Adams MJ, Gallagher JA, Donnison IS (2009) Fermentation study on Saccharina latissima for bioethanol production considering variable pre-treatments. J Appl Phycol 21:569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afionis S, Stringer LC (2012) European Union leadership in biofuels regulation: Europe as a normative power? J Clean Prod 32:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves LA, Felipe MGA, Silva JB, Silva SS, Prata AMR (1998) Pre treatment of sugar cane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate for xylitol production by Candida guilliermondii. J Appl Biochem Biotechnol 70–72:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boucher P (2012) The role of controversy, regulation and engineering in UK biofuel development. Energy Pol 42:148–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruhn A, Dahl J, Nielsen HB, Nikolaisen L, Rasmussen MB, Markager S, Olesen B, Arias C, Jensen PD (2011) Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: biomass yield, methane production and combustion. Bio Tech 102:2595–2604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaplin MF (1986) Monosaccharide. In: Chaplin MF, Kennedy JF (eds) Carbohydrate analysis: a practical approach. IRC, Oxford, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  7. de Ruiter GA, Rudolph B (1997) Carrageenan biotechnology. Trends Food Sci Technol 8:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deverell R, McDonnell K, Ward S, Devlin G (2009) An economic assessment of potential ethanol production pathways in Ireland. Energy Pol 37:3993–4002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Vrije T, Bakker RR, Budde AW, Lai MH, Mars AE, Claassen PA (2009) Efficient hydrogen production from lignocellulosic energy crop Miscanthus by extreme thermophilic bacteria Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and Thermotoga neapolitana. Biotechnol Biofuel 2:12. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-2-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixon RK, McGowan E, Onysko G, Scheer RM (2010) US energy conservation and efficiency policies: challenges and opportunities. Energy Pol 38:6398–6408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray KA, Zhao L, Emptage M (2006) Bioethanol. Opin Chem Biol 10:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horn SJ, Aasen IM, Ostgaard K (2008) Ethanol production from seaweed extract. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 25:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jol CN, Neiss TG, Penninkhof B, Rudolph B, Ruiter GAD (1999) A novel high-performance anion-exchange chromatographic method for the analysis of carrageenans and agars containing 3,6-anhydrogalactose. Anal Biochem 268:213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2004) Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:10–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kochert G (1978) Carbohydrate determination by the phenol-sulfuric acid method. In: Hellebust JA, Craigie JS (eds) Handbook of phycological methods, vol II, Physiological and biochemical methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 95–97Google Scholar
  16. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hagerdal BH, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant (1999) The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 24:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Levring T, Hoppe HA, Schmid OJ (1969) Marine algae. A survey of research and utilization. Botanica marina handbook, vol. 1. Cram, De Gruyter & Co, , Hamburg, p 421Google Scholar
  18. McHugh DJ (1987) Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds. Fisheries Technical Paper, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. McHugh D (2003) A guide to the seaweed industry. Fisheries Technical Paper, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  20. Meinita DNM, Kang JY, Jeong GT, Koo HM, Park SM, Hong YK (2012a) Bioethanol production from the acid hydrolysate of the carrageenophyte Kappaphycus alvarezii (cottonii). J Appl Phycol 24:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meinita DNM, Jeong GT, Hong YK (2011) Comparison of sulfuric and hydrochloric acids as catalysts in hydrolysis of Kappaphycus alvarezii (cottonii). Bioproc Biosyst Eng 35:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meinita DNM, Jeong GT, Hong YK (2012b) Detoxification of acidic catalyzed hydrolysate of Kappaphycus alvarezii (cottonii). Bioproc Biosyst Eng 3:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mouradi-Givernaud A, Amina-Hassani L, Givernaud T, Lemoine Y, Benharbet O (1999) Biology and agar composition of Gelidium sesquipedale harvested along the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Hydrobiologia 5:391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orosco CA, Anong C, Nukaya M, Ohno M, Sawamura M, Kusunose H (1992) Yield and physical characteristics of Agar from Gracilaria chorda Holmes: comparison with those from Southeast Asian species. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 58:1711–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Percival E (1979) The polysaccharide of green, red and brown seaweeds: their basic structure, biosynthesis and function. Br Phycol J 14:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prescott SC, Dun CG (1959) Industrial microbiology, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 120Google Scholar
  27. Wi SG, Kim HJ, Mahadevan SA, Yang DJ, Bae HJ (2009) The potential value of the seaweed Ceylon moss (Gelidium amansii) as an alternative bioenergy resource. Bioresour Technol 100:6658–6660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yokoya NS, West JA, Luchi AE (2004) Effects of plant growth regulators on callus formation, growth and regeneration in axenic tissue cultures of Gracilaria tenuistipitata and Gracilaria perplexa (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). Phycol Res 52:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Dyah Nur Meinita
    • 1
  • Bintang Marhaeni
    • 1
  • Tjahjo Winanto
    • 1
  • Gwi-Taek Jeong
    • 2
  • Mohammed Nurul Absar Khan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yong-Ki Hong
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and Marine ScienceJenderal Soedirman UniversityPurwokertoIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyPukyong National UniversityBusanSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries TechnologyBangladesh Agricultural UniversityMymensinghBangladesh

Personalised recommendations