Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 315–318 | Cite as

Microalgae mass culture: the constraints of scaling-up

Article

Abstract

There is overwhelming evidence that microalgae would be the logical source of oils for biodiesel production, the best option for CO2 sequestration and numerous other applications. However, this apparent lucrative approach is still in its infancy. In order to impact on global energy needs, bioremediation and other potential applications, vast quantities of biomass must be produced at a reliable rate and as cost-effective as possible. When extrapolating volumetric rates from laboratory or small-scale outdoor cultures to large-scale outdoor areal production rates, it becomes apparent that many of the potential claims are either misleading or still only a dream. Open raceway ponds are at present the only feasible culture system for the production of millions of tons of biomass. To date, at best photosynthetic efficiencies of around 1.2% have been achieved, but with present understanding and know-how efficiencies of double that should be achievable, especially when vertical mixing is increased in raceway ponds.

Keywords

Photosynthetic efficiencies Mixing Scaling-up Open raceway ponds Computational fluid dynamic modelling 

References

  1. Burlew JS (1953) Algal culture: from laboratory to pilot plant. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication 600. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, 357 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends Biotechnol 26:126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Congming L, Vonshak A (1999) Photoinhibition in outdoor Spirulina platensis cultures assessed by polyphasic chlorophyll fluorescence transients. J Appl Phycol 11:355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodd JC (1986) Elements of pond design and construction. In: Richmond A (ed) CRC handbook of microalgal mass culture. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 265–283Google Scholar
  5. Grobbelaar JU (1994) Turbulence in mass algal cultures and the role of light/dark fluctuations. J Appl Phycol 6:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grobbelaar JU (2000) Physiological and technological considerations for optimizing mass algal cultures. J Appl Phycol 12:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grobbelaar JU (2007) Photosynthetic characteristics of Spirulina platensis grown in commercial-scale open outdoor raceway ponds: what do the organisms tell us? J Appl Phycol 19:591–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grobbelaar JU (2009a) From laboratory to commercial production: a case study of a Spirulina (Arthrospira) facility at Musina, South Africa. J Appl Phycol 21:523–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grobbelaar JU (2009b) Upper limits of photosynthetic productivity and problems of scaling. J Appl Phycol 21:519–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grobbelaar JU (2010) Microalgal biomass production: challenges and realities. Photosynth Res 106:135–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grobbelaar JU, Soeder CJ, Stengel E (1990) Modeling algal productivity in large outdoor cultures and waste treatment systems. Biomass 12:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grobbelaar JU, Nedbal L, Tichy V (1996) Influence of high frequency light/dark fluctuations on photosynthetic characteristics of microalgae photoacclimated to different light intensities and implications for mass algal cultivation. J Appl Phycol 8:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laws EA, Berning JL (1991) A study of the energetic and economics of microalgal mass culture with the marine chlorophyte Tetraselmis suecica: implications for use of power plant stack gasses. Biotechnol Bioeng 37:936–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laws EA, Terry KL, Wickman J, Challup MS (1983) A simple algal production system designed to utilize the flashing light effect. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:2319–2335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee Y-K (2001) Microalgal mass culture systems and methods: their limitation and potential. J Appl Phycol 13:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee YK, Ding SY, Low CS, Chang YC, Forday WL, Chew PC (1995) Design and performance of an α-type tubular photobioreactor for mass cultivation of microalgae. J Appl Phycol 7:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nickelsen K (2009) The construction of a scientific model: Otto Warburg and the building block strategy. Stud His Philos Biol biome Sci 40:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oswald WJ (1980) Algal production—problems, achievements and potential. In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds) Algae biomass. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  19. Pulz O (2001) Photobioreactors: production systems for phototrophic microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richmond A (1996) Efficient utilization of high irradiance for production of photoautotrophic cell mass: a survey. J Appl Phycol 8:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Richmond A (2000) Microalgal biotechnology at the turn of the millennium: a personal view. J Appl Phycol 12:441–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richmond A, Vonshak A (1978) Spirulina culture in Israel. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol 11:274–280Google Scholar
  23. Setlik I, Sust M, Malek I (1970) Dual purpose open circulation units for large scale culture of algae in temperate zones. 1. Basic design consideration and scheme of pilot plant. Algol Stud 1:111–164Google Scholar
  24. Soeder CJ (1980) The scope of microalgae for food and feed. In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds) Algae biomass. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical, Amsterdam, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  25. Tredici MR (2010) Photobiology of microalgae mass cultures: understanding the tools for the next green revolution. Biofuels 1:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tredici MR, Zitelli C (1998) Efficiency of sunlight utilization: tubular versus flat photobioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 57:187–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vonshak A, Torzillo G (2004) Environmental stress physiology. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal culture. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 57–82Google Scholar
  28. Zarrouck C (1966) Contribution à l’ètude d’une cyanophycèe. Influence de divers facteurs physiques et chimiques sur la croissance et la photosynthèse de Spirulina maxima. Ph.D. thesis, University of ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations