Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 229–237 | Cite as

Nutrient interactions between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton under different carbon dioxide regimes

  • Shannon L. Meseck
  • Barry C. Smith
  • Gary H. Wikfors
  • Jennifer H. Alix
  • Diane Kapareiko
Article

Abstract

Light, nutrients, temperature, pH, and salinity are important factors in controlling the growth of phytoplankton and bacterioplankton. Supply of key nutrients to these communities can result in mutualistic or competitive relationships between bacterioplankton and phytoplankton. In this study, we investigated growth and uptake of nutrients by the marine prasinophyte flagellate Tetraselmis chui (strain PLY429) in the presence and absence of a community of bacterioplankton at two pH levels. Growth of PLY429 and total nutrient uptake were calculated for each treatment. The addition of bacterioplankton resulted in lower growth rates of PLY429, but the removal of ammonium was greater in those cultures with bacterioplankton present. The division rate of PLY429 was affected by pH; however, pH changes did not result in different uptake rates of nitrate, ammonium, or phosphate by the mixed algal and bacterial assemblage. These findings suggest that bacterioplankton and phytoplankton were competing for ammonium and that a lower pH resulted in more rapid algal growth.

Key words

Tetraselmis chui nitrate uptake phosphate uptake pH Effects 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Mark Dixon for his help in maintaining cultures of Tetraselmis chui and bacterioplankton for this experiment.

References

  1. Alix J, Wikfors G (2004) A flow-cytometric method for counting microalgae and bacterial cells in the same sample. J Shellfish Res 23:631Google Scholar
  2. Azov Y (1982) Effect of pH on inorganic carbon uptake in algal cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1300–1306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burkhardt S, Reibesell U (1997) CO2 availability affects elemental composition (C:N:P) of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 155:67–76Google Scholar
  4. Carlsson P, Caron D (2001) Seasonal variation of phosphorus limitation of bacterial growth in a small lake. Limnol Oceanogr 46:108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen C, Durbin E (1994) Effects of pH on the growth and carbon uptake of marine phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 109:83–94Google Scholar
  6. Currie D, Kalff J (1984) Can bacteria out compete phytoplankton for phosphorus? A chemostate test. Microb Ecol 10:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delucca R, McCracken M (1977) Observations on interactions between naturally-collected bacteria and several species of algae. Hydrobiologica 55:71–75Google Scholar
  8. Emerson K, Russo R, Lund R (1975) Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. J Fish Res Board Can 32:2379–2383Google Scholar
  9. Goldman JC, Azav Y, Riley CB et al (1982) The effect of pH in intensive microalgal cultures. I. Biomass regulation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 57:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grossart H (1999) Interactions between marine bacteria and axenic diatoms (Cylindrotheca fusiformis, Nitzschia laevis, and Thalassiosira weissflogii) incubated under various conditions in the lab. Aquat Microb Ecol 19:1–11Google Scholar
  11. Guillard R (1973) Division rates. In: Stein JR (ed) Handbook of phycological methods: culture methods and growth measurements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 289–312Google Scholar
  12. Hansen H, Koroleff F (1999) Determination of nutrients. In: Grasshoff K, Kremling K, Ehrhardt M (eds) Methods of seawater analysis. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 159–228Google Scholar
  13. Hinga KR (1992) Co-occurrence of dinoglagellate blooms and high pH in marine enclosures. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 86:181–187Google Scholar
  14. Joint I, Morris R (1982) The role of bacteria in the turnover of organic matter in the sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 20:65–118Google Scholar
  15. Joint I, Henriksen P, Fonnes G et al (2002) Competition for inorganic nutrients between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton in nutrient manipulated mesocosms. Aquat Microb Ecol 29:145–159Google Scholar
  16. Kirchman D (1994) The uptake of inorganic nutrients by heterotrophic bacteria. Microb Ecol 28:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meseck S, Smith B (2004) How high pH’s can affect the chemistry in large volume cultures of Tetraselmis chui (PLY429). J Shellfish Res 23:640Google Scholar
  18. Mullin MM, Sloan PR, Eppley RW (1966) Relationship between carbon content, cell volume, and area in phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 11:307–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olaizola M, Duerr E, Freeman D (1991) Effect of CO2 enhancement in an outdoor algal production system using Tetraselmis. J Appl Phycol 3:363–363Google Scholar
  20. Ree G (1972) Competition between an alga and an aquatic bacterium for phosphate. Limnol Oceanogr 17:505–514Google Scholar
  21. Schmidt LE, Hansen PJ (2001) Allelopathy in the prymnesiophyte Chrysochromulina polylepis: effect of cell concentration, growth phase, and pH. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216:67–81Google Scholar
  22. Smith B, Meseck S (2004) Some implications of controlling CO sub(2) supply to cultures of Tetraselmis chui (PLY429). J Shellfish Res 23:642Google Scholar
  23. Ukeles R, Bishop J (1975) Enhancement of phytoplankton growth by marine bacteria. J Phycol 11:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vadstein O (2000) Heterotrophic, planktonic bacteria and cycling of phosphorus: phosphorus requirements, competitive ability and food web interactions. Adv Microb Ecol 16:115–168Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shannon L. Meseck
    • 1
  • Barry C. Smith
    • 1
  • Gary H. Wikfors
    • 1
  • Jennifer H. Alix
    • 1
  • Diane Kapareiko
    • 1
  1. 1.NOAA/NMFSMilfordUSA

Personalised recommendations