Treatment of swine manure effluent using freshwater algae: Production, nutrient recovery, and elemental composition of algal biomass at four effluent loading rates
- 958 Downloads
Cultivating algae on nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in animal manure effluents presents an alternative to the current practice of land application. The objective of this study was to determine how algal productivity, nutrient removal efficiency, and elemental composition of turf algae change in response to different loading rates of raw swine manure effluent. Algal biomass was harvested weekly from laboratory scale algal turf scrubber units using four manure effluent loading rates (0.24, 0.40, 0.62 and 1.2 L m−2 d−1) corresponding to daily loading rates of 0.3–1.4 g total N and 0.08–0.42 g total P. Mean algal productivity values increased from 7.1 g DW m−2 d−1 at the lowest loading rate (0.24 L m−2 d−1) to 9.4 g DW m−2 d−1 at the second loading rate (0.40 L m−2 d−1). At these loading rates, algal N and P accounted for> 90% of input N and 68–76% of input P, respectively. However, at higher loading rates algal productivity did not increase and was unstable at the highest loading rate. Mean N and P contents in the dried biomass increased 1.5 to 2.0-fold with increasing loading rate up to maximums of 5.7% N and 1.8% P at 1.2 L m−2 d−1. Biomass concentrations of Al, Ca, Cd, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Si, and Zn increased 1.2 to 2.6-fold over the 5-fold range of loading rate. Biomass concentrations of Cd, K, Pb, and Si did not increase significantly with loading rate. At the loading rate of 0.40 L m−2 d−1 (corresponding to peak productivity) the mean concentrations of individual components in the algal biomass were (in mg kg−1): 250 (Al), 4900 (Ca), 0.30 (Cd), 1050 (Fe), 3.4 (Pb), 2500 (Mg), 105 (Mn), 6.0 (Mo), 7,500 (K), and 510 (Zn). At these concentrations, heavy metals in the algal biomass would not be expected to reduce its value as a soil or feed amendment.
algal turf scrubber
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- APHA (1995) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Ayala, Bravo (1984) Animal wastes media for Spirulina production. Arch. Hydrobiol. 67(3): 349–355.Google Scholar
- Costa R, Medri W, Perdomo CC (2000) High-rate pond for treatment of piggery wastes. Water Sci. Technol. 42: 357–362.Google Scholar
- Goh A (1986) Production of microalgae using pig waste as a substrate. In Barclay WR, McIntosh RP (eds), Algal Biomass Technologies. Cramer. Berlin. pp. 235–244Google Scholar
- NRC (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: Seventh revised edition. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 408pp.Google Scholar