Flourishing Dogs: The Case for an Individualized Conception of Welfare and Its Implications
- 416 Downloads
Abstract
Martha Nussbaum argues that animals (including ourselves) are entitled to a flourishing life according to the norm for their species. Nussbaum furthermore suggests that in the case of dogs, breed norms as well as species norms are relevant. Her theses capture both common intuitions among laypeople according to which there is something wrong with the breeding of “unnatural” animals, or animals that are too different from their wild ancestors, and the dog enthusiast’s belief that dogs departing from the norms for their breed are tragic. I argue that the high diversity of the dog species and the ultimate arbitrariness of breed norms support the thesis that a conception of welfare must be tied to what the individual requires in order to flourish. In the second part of the paper, I discuss the implications that an individualized (but sufficiently sophisticated) welfare conception has for the breeding of dogs for conformation shows, for the pet market and for the performance of various tasks for which we need working dogs.
Keywords
Animal welfare Animal breeding Dog breeding Preferentialism Flourishing Species norm Martha NussbaumReferences
- Bovenkirk, B., Brom, F. W. A., & Van Den Bergh, B. J. (2002). Brave new birds: The use of “animal integrity” in animal ethics. Hastings Center Report, 32, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis. A political theory of animal rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare. Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Jeppsson, S. (2014). Purebred dogs and canine wellbeing. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Midgley, M. (2000). Biotechnology and monstrosity: Why we should pay attention to the ‘yuk’ factor. Hastings Center Report, 30, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nordenfelt, L. (2006). Animal and human health and welfare: A comparative philosophical analysis. Oxford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar