Advertisement

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 81–102 | Cite as

What to Buy? On the Complexity of Being a Critical Consumer

  • Mickey GjerrisEmail author
  • Christian Gamborg
  • Henrik Saxe
Articles
First Online:

Abstract

This article criticises the notion that critical/political/ethical consumerism can solve issues related to sustainability and food production. It does this by analysing the complexity of the concept of sustainability as related to food choices. The current trend of pursuing a sustainable food production through critical purchase decisions rather than through regulation is shown to be problematic, as shopping for a more sustainable food system might be much harder than initially believed due to the conflicting values and inherent trade-offs entailed in the different notions of sustainability. Thus, critical consumerism may give way to false expectations as the complexity of choices transpires. One obvious way out is to let decisions regarding food choices be made earlier in the food production chain as well as through new modes of governance engaging members of civil society in their capacity as citizens rather than consumers. This entails complementing society’s reliance on critical consumerism with a citizen-oriented and political process in support of making more sustainable food choices.

Keywords

Climate change Food production Critical/political/ethical consumerism Sustainability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support from the OPUS project, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, and the division of Quantitative Sustainability Assessment and the Global Decision Support Initiative, both at DTU Management Engineering.

References

  1. Aiking, H. (2014). Protein production: Planet, profit, plus people? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(suppl), 483S–489S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Dietetic Association. (2009). Position of the American dietetic association: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109, 1266–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audsley, E., Brander, M., Chatterton, J., Murphy-Bokern, D., Webster, C., & Williams, A. (2009). How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. UK: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  5. Balazs, B. (2013). Civil food networks—Stakeholders’ experiences on the community supported agriculture in Hungary. Civil Szemle, 10, 107–126.Google Scholar
  6. Baranski, M., Średnicka-Tober, D., Volakakis, N., Seal, C., Sanderson, R., Stewart, G. B., et al. (2014). Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentration and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition (open access),. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001366.Google Scholar
  7. Barber, B. R. (2007). Consumed. How markets corrupt children, infantilize adults and swallow citizens whole. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, W. (1989). The pleasures of eating. The Journal of Gastronomy, 5, 125–131.Google Scholar
  9. Borkfelt, S., Kondrup, S., Röcklinsberg, R., Bjørkdahl, K., & Gjerris, M. (2015). Closer to nature? A critical discussion of the marketing of “Ethical” animal products. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(6), 1053–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boström, M., & Klintman, M. (2008). Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. British Tomato Growers’ Association (2012). The Greenhouse Effect—Environmental Issues. http://www.britishtomatoes.co.uk/environment.
  12. Browne, A. W., Harris, P. J. C., Hofny-Colling, A. H., Pasiecznik, N., & Wallace, R. R. (2000). Organic production and ethical trade: Definition, practice and links. Food Policy, 25(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cafaggi, F., & Iamiceli, P. (2014). Supply chains, contractual governance and certification regimes. European Journal of Law and Economics, 37, 131–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrier, J. (2010). Protecting the environment the natural way: Ethical consumption. Antipode, 42(3), 672–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention-behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2759–2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cho, Y. N. (2014). Different shades of green consciousness: The interplay of sustainability labeling and environmental impact on product evaluations. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s.10551-014-2080-4.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, J., Newmann, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen consumers. Chaninging publics and changing public services. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Dangour, A. D., Lock, K., Hayter, A., Aikenhead, A., Allen, E., & Uauy, R. (2010). Nutrition-related health effects of organic foods: A systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, A. R. (2014). Co-creating sustainable eating futures: Technology, ICT and citizen-consumer ambivalence. Futures, 62, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Bakker, E., & Dagevos, H. (2012). Reducing meat consumption in today´s consumer society. Questioning the citizen-comsumer gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 877–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Del Savio, L., & Schmietow, B. (2013). Environmental footprint of foods: The duty to inform. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26, 787–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ejrnæs, R. P., Wiberg-Larsen, T. E., Holm, A., Josefson, B., Strandberg, B., Nygaard, L. W., Andersen, A., Winding, M., Termansen, M. D. D., Hansen, M., Søndergaard, A. S., Hansen, S., Lundsteen, A., Baattrup-Pedersen, E., Kristensen, P. H., Krogh, V., Simonsen, B., Hasler, A., Levin, G. (2011). Danmarks biodiversitet 2010: Status, udvikling og trusler [biodiversity in Denmark 2010: Status, development and threaths]. DMU Report No. 815. University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  25. Fogelberg, C. L. (2008). På väg mot miljøanpassade kostråd. Vetenskapligt underlag inför miljökonsekvensanalysen av Livsmedelverkets kostråd. Sweden: Livsmedelsverket, National Food Administration.Google Scholar
  26. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). (2010). Final document: International scientific symposium biodiversity and sustainable diets: United against Hunger. 3–5 November 2010. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  27. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). World livestock 2011—Livestock in food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  28. Forman, J., & Silverstein, J. (2012). Organic foods: Health and environmental advantages and disadvantages. Pediatrics, 130, 1408–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Forssell, S., & Lanoksi, K. (2014). The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: An examination through “alternative” characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values,. doi: 10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4.Google Scholar
  30. Francione, G., & Garner, R. (2010). The animal rights debate: Abolition or regulation?. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fuchs, D., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 261–288.Google Scholar
  32. Gamborg, C., & Larsen, J. B. (2005). Towards more sustainable forestry? The ethics of close-to-nature forestry. Silva Carelica, 49, 55–64.Google Scholar
  33. Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2005a). Applying the notion of sustainability—Dilemmas and the need for dialogue. In S. Holm & J. Gunning (Eds.), Ethics, Law and Society (pp. 123–130). Hants: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Gamborg, C., & Sandøe, P. (2005b). Sustainability in farm animal breeding. A review. Animal Production Science, 92(3), 221–231.Google Scholar
  35. Garnett, T. (2014). What is a sustainable diet? A discussion paper. Oxford: Food Climate Research Network.Google Scholar
  36. Genus, A. (2014). Governing sustainability: A discourse-institutional approach. Sustainability, 6, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gjerris, M. (2015). Willed blindness: A discussion of our moral shortcomings in relation to animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 28(3), 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gjerris, M., & Gaiani, S. (2013). Household food waste in Nordic countries. Estimations and ethical implications. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 7(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  39. Gorgitano, M. T., & Sodano, V. (2014). Sustainable food consumption: Concept and policies. Quality—Access to Success, 15(Suppl. 1), 207–212.Google Scholar
  40. Griffiths, H. (2005). Human and environmental rights: The need for corporate accountability. In F. Dodds & T. Pippard (Eds.), Human and environmental security: An agenda for change (pp. 221–234). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  41. Grunert, K., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gulyas, E. (2008). Interpretations of ethical consumption. Review of Sociology, 14(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Halberg, N., Dalgaard, R., Rasmussen, M. D. (2006). Miljøvurdering af konventionel og økologisk avl af grøntsager. Arbejdsrapport fra Miljøstyrelsen nr. 5. In Danish: Working Report from the Danish Environmental Agency—Environmental Assessment of Conventional and Organic Production of Vegetables. http://www2.mst.dk/udgiv/Publikationer/2006/87-7614-960-9/pdf/87-7614-961-7.pdf.
  44. Halweil, B. (2006). Can organic farming feed us all? World Watch Magazine, 19(3). http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4060. Accessed 28 Nov 2015.
  45. Harrison, R., Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2005). The ethical consumer. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  46. Hassan, L., Shaw, D., Shiu, E., Walsh, G., & Parry, S. (2013). Uncertainty in ethical consumer choice: A conceptual model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hepting, D. H., Jaffe, J., & Macaig, T. (2014). Operationalizing ethics in food choice decisions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 27, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hertwich, E., van der Voet, E., Suh, S., Tukker, A., Huijbregts, M., Kazmierczyk, P., Lenzen, M., McNeely, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2010). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production: Priority Products and Materials. United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  49. Holt, D. B. (2012). Constructing sustainable consumption. From ethical values to the cultural transformation of unsustainable markets. The Annals of the American Academy, 644, 236–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jacobsen, E., & Dalsrud, A. (2007). Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20, 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jägerskog, A., & Clausen, T. J. (Eds.). (2012). Feeding a thirsty world—Challenges and opportunities for a water and food secure future. Report no. 31. Stockholm: SIWI.Google Scholar
  52. Jensen, J. D., Saxe, H., & Denver, S. (2015). Cost-effectiveness of a New Nordic Diet as a strategy for health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 7370–7391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnston, J. (2008). The citizen-consumer hybrid: Ideological tensions and the case of whole foods market. Theory and Society, 37(3), 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What Is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lewis, W. (2011). ‘Be the change you wish to see in the world’—(Not) Gandhi. Elephantjournal.com. http://www.elephantjournal.com/2011/08/be-the-change-you-wish-to-see-in-the-world-not-gandhi/. Accessed 18 July 2014.
  56. Lockie, S. (2009). Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: Assembling the ‘citizen consumer’. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(3), 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy—Beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Markkula, A., & Moisander, J. (2012). Discursive confusion over sustainable consumption: A discursive perspective on the perplexity of marketplace knowledge. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maxey, L. (2007). From “alternative” to “sustainable” food. In D. Maye, L. Holloway, & M. Kneafsey (Eds.), Alternative food geographies: Concepts and debates (pp. 55–75). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  60. Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. (2012). Sustainable citizenship and the new politics of consumption. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 88–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Middlemiss, L. (2014). Individualised or participatory? Exploring late-modern identity and sustainable development. Environmental Politics, 23, 929–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Minero, G., Codoni, A., Bonera, M., Corvi, E., & Bertoli, G. (2014). Being green: From attitude to actual consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies,. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12128.Google Scholar
  63. Morgan, K. (2010). Local and green, global and fair: The ethical foodscape and the politics of care. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1852–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nordgren, A. (2012). Ethical issues in mitigation of climate change: The option of reduced meat production and consumption. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(4), 563–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ovaskainen, V., & Kniivilä, M. (2005). Consumer versus citizen preferences in contingent valuation: Evidence on the role of question framing. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 49, 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peck, J., & Philips, R. (2008). Citizen Rennaisance. http://www.citizenrenaissance.com. Accessed 19 July 2014.
  67. Röcklinsberg, H. (2014). Fish consumption: Choices in the intersection of public concern, fish welfare, food security, human health and climate change. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 05/2014,. doi: 10.1007/s10806-014-9506-y.Google Scholar
  68. Royal Society of Chemistry (2004). Don’t worry it’s organic. Chemistry World 2004. http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2004/June/organic.asp.
  69. Sabaté, J., & Soret, S. (2014). Sustainability of plant-based diets: Back to the future. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(suppl), 467S–482S.Google Scholar
  70. Saunders, C., Barber, A., & Taylor, G. (2006). Food miles—Comparative energy/emissions performance of New Zealand’s agriculture Industry. Research Report No. 205.Google Scholar
  71. Saxe, H. (2011). Diet as a healthy and cost-effective instrument in environmental protection. In J. O. Nriagu (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Health (Vol. 2, pp. 70–82). Burlington: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saxe, H. (2014). The New Nordic Diet is an effective tool in environmental protection: It reduces the associated socio-economic cost of diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99, 1117–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saxe, H., Larsen, T. M., & Mogensen, L. (2013). Two healthy Nordic diets reduce the impact on climatic change of eating and drinking. Climatic Change, 116, 249–262. doi: 10.1007/s1054-012-0495-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schudson, M. (2007). Citizens, Consumers, and the Good Society. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foleey, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventionsl agriculture. Nature, 485, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shaw, D., & Black, I. (2010). Market based political action: A path to sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 18, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Söderbaum, P. (2014). The role of economics and democracy in institutional change for sustainability. Sustainability, 6, 2755–2765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sørensen, M. P. (2005). Liberal democratic society and political consumerism—A problematic combination. In: M. Boström, A. Føllesdal, M. Klintman, M. Micheletti & M. P. Sørensen (Eds.), Political consumerism: Its motivations, power, and conditions in the Nordic countries and elsewhere. Proceeding from the 2nd International Seminar on Political Consumerism, Oslo, 27–29 Aug 2004 (pp. 59–76).Google Scholar
  79. Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Institutional change for strong sustainable consumption: Sustainable consumption and the degrowth economy. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 10, 62–76.Google Scholar
  80. Starik, M., & Kanashiro, P. (2013). Toward a theory of sustainability management: Uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization and Environment, 26, 1–30.Google Scholar
  81. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock´s long shadow—Environmental issues and options. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  82. Stolle, D., & Micheletti, M. (2015). Political consumerism. Global responsibility in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Sullivan, C. & Climatewire (2013). Can livestock grazing stop desertification? Scientific American, 3 March 2013. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=can-livestock-grazing-stop-desertification.
  84. Thompson, P. B. (2007). Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 51, 5–16.Google Scholar
  85. Thompson, P. B., Appleby, M., Busch, L., Kalof, L., Miele, M., Norwood, B. F., & Pajor, E. (2011). Values and public acceptability dimensions of sustainable egg production. Poultry Science, 90, 2097–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Trentmann, F. (2010). Citizenship and consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 47–58.Google Scholar
  87. UNCTAD (2013). Wake up before it is too late. Make agriculture truly sustainable now for food security in a changing climate. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Trade and Environmental Review 2013. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ditcted2012d3_en.pdf.
  88. UNEP-UNCTAD. (2008). Organic Agriculture and Food Security in Africa. United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. UNEP-UNCTAD Capacity-building Task Force on Trade, Environment and Development. New York, Geneva. http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf.
  89. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer ‘attitude—Behavioral intention’ gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weidema, B. P. (2009). Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results. Ecological Economics, 68, 1591–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weidema, B. P., Wesnæs, M., Hermansen, J., Kristensen, T., Halberg, N. (2008). Environmental Improvement Potentials of Meat and Dairy Products. JRC Scientific and Technical Report. EUR 23491 EN.Google Scholar
  92. Wilkins, J. F. (2005). Eating right here: Moving from consumer to food citizen. Agriculture and Human Values, 22, 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Yates, L. S. (2011). Boycotting and boycotting in Europe. European Societies, 13, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yu, Y., Kuishuang, F., & Hubacek, K. (2013). Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1178–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Žižek, S. (2012). The Pervert´s Guide to Ideology. Zeitgeist Films.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mickey Gjerris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Gamborg
    • 1
  • Henrik Saxe
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Food and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.DTU Management Engineering, Division of Quantitative Sustainability Assessment and the Global Decision Support InitiativeTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options