Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study
- 664 Downloads
In September 2012, Gilles-Eric Séralini and seven coauthors published an article in Food and Chemical Toxicology claiming that rats fed Roundup©-resistant genetically modified maize alone, genetically modified maize with Roundup©, or Roundup© for 2 years had a higher percentage of tumors and kidney and liver damage than normal controls. Shortly after this study was published, numerous scientists and several scientific organizations criticized the research as methodologically and ethically flawed. In January 2014, the journal retracted the article without the authors’ consent on the grounds that the research was inconclusive. In June 2014, Environmental Sciences Europe published a slightly modified version of the retracted paper. The publication, retraction and subsequent republication of the Séralini study raise important scientific and ethical issues for journal editors. Decisions to retract an article should be made on the basis of well-established policies. Articles should be retracted only for serious errors that undermine the reliability of the data or results, or for serious ethical lapses, such as research misconduct or mistreatment of animal or human subjects. Inconclusiveness, by itself, is not a sufficient reason for retracting an article, though a flawed study design might be. Retracted articles that are submitted for republication should undergo scientific review to ensure that they meet appropriate standards. Republished articles should be linked to the original, retracted publication. Journals that are reviewing studies with significant scientific and social implications should take special care to ensure that peer review is rigorous and fair.
KeywordsGenetically modified foods Retraction Peer review Ethics Scientific methodology
This research was supported by the Intramural Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health.
- Arjo, G., Portero, M., Pinol, C., Vinas, J., Matias-Guiu, X., Capell, T., et al. (2013). Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: An in depth analysis of the Seralini et al. study claiming that Roundup Ready corn or the herbicide Roundup cause cancer in rats. Transgenic Research, 22(2), 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Casassus, B. (2014). Change of journal does not convince critics that rat diseases were caused by genetically modified maize. Nature News, 24 June 2014. Available at http://www.nature.com/news/paper-claiming-gm-link-with-tumours-republished-1.15463 Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2009). Retraction guidelines. Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- EFSA, GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. (2008). Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: The role of animal feeding trials. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46(Supplement 1), S2–S70.Google Scholar
- Entine, J. (2014). Profile of Gilles-Éric Séralini, author of republished retracted GMO corn rat study. American Enterprise Institute, June 24, 2014. Available at http://www.aei.org/article/health/profile-of-gilles-eric-seralini/. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Environmental Working Group. (2012). Five things you should know about GMOs. Available at http://www.ewg.org/research/five-things-you-should-know-about-gmos. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Food and Chemical Toxicology. (2014a). Retraction notice to “Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize” [Food Chem. Toxicol. 50 (2012) 4221–4231]. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 63, 244.Google Scholar
- Food and Chemical Toxicology. (2014b). Editorial board. Available at http://www.journals.elsevier.com/food-and-chemical-toxicology/editorial-board/. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Fugh-Berman, A., & Sherman, T. G. (2014). Rounding up scientific journals. Bioethics Forum, 10 January 2014. Available at http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?id=6684. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Hammond, B., Goldstein, D. A., & Saltmiras, D. (2013). Response to original research article, in press, corrected proof, ‘‘Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize’’. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 53, 459–464.Google Scholar
- Institute of Science and Society. (2013). Retracting Séralini study violates science and ethics. Available at http://www.isis.org.uk/Retracting_Serallini_study_violates_science_and_ethics.php. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Ollivier, L. (2013). A comment on “Séralini, G.-E. et al., Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem. Toxicol. (2012).” http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 53, 458.
- Public Citizen. (2014). Genetically modified organisms. Available at http://www.citizen.org/publications/publicationredirect.cfm?ID=5102. Accessed 15 January 2015.
- Resnik, D. B. (2012). Environmental health ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Retraction Watch. (2014). Retracted Seralini GMO-rat study republished. Available at http://retractionwatch.com/2014/06/24/retracted-seralini-gmo-rat-study-republished/. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
- Robert, W., Lerayer, A., Fedoroff, N., Giddings, L. V., Strauss, S. H., Leaver, C., et al. (2013). We request a serious reconsideration of the recent paper by Seraliniet al. alleging tumorigenesis in rats resulting from consumption of corn derived from crops improved through biotechnology (Séralini et al. 2012). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 53, 455–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanders, D., Kamoun, S., Williams, B., & Festing, M. (2013). Re: Séralini, G.-E., et al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem. Toxicol. (2012). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 53, 450–453. Google Scholar
- Séralini, G. E., Clair, E., Mesnage, R., Gress, S., Defarge, N., Malatesta, M., Hennequin, D., & de Vendômois, J. S. (2012). Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(11), 4221–4231. Retraction in: Food and Chemical Toxicology (2014), 63, 244.Google Scholar