Advertisement

Challenging Food Governance Models: Analyzing the Food Citizen and the Emerging Food Constitutionalism from an EU Perspective

  • L. Escajedo San-EpifanioEmail author
Articles

Abstract

Critical analyses of current food systems underline the need to respond to important challenges in questions of nutritional health, environmental sustainability, socio-economic development and protection of the cultural wealth. A wide range of perspectives and methodologies were used to carry out those analyses yielding a significant variety of proposals to undertake the challenges. In most of those analyses, the need to transform our current food systems both from the local to the global level is emphasized, paying attention to food chain processes as well as to decision-makers. The analysis presented in this paper reflects specifically on those proposals based on a common aspect: the need to transform the governance of the EU present-day food system, that is, who makes decisions, how are those decisions made, and which changes need to be made to empower food consumers. The introduction of reforms to change these models is proposed. The focus of these proposals, including those that argue in favour of food sovereignty, the human right to food or the acknowledgement of a food citizenship, share, I believe, a common key. All of them advocate transformations in models of food governance on the basis of a series of mechanisms and principles which for centuries have been employed to control power and grant the governed a status digno vis-à-vis those who govern. Within those proposals we may identify an incipient food constitutionalism, which I will address along with the opportunities and obstacles inherent in the current EU Legal Framework.

Keywords

Food constitutionalism Food citizen Food related fundamental rights Multilevel food governance Food sovereignty Human right to food 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge here the input of the different experts that took part in the review process. Their comments and suggestions have been very helpful. “Food, Beliefs and Cultural Diversity Project”, funded by the Government of Castilla-Leon; Research Team Grant IT 743-13 of the Directorate on Scientific Policy of the Basque Country “Multilevel Constitutionalism and Integration of Diversity (Political, Legal-Institutional and Cultural-Religious)”; “The Ways of Federalism and the Horizons of the Spanish Territorial Autonomy: Accommodation of political and cultural diversity”, DER2013-47774-P (MINECO); URBAN-ELIKA, Cross-Disciplinary Studies for Food and Society, “Improving access to food”, US14/19 (University of the Basque Country).

References

  1. Ackerman, B. (2007). The living constitution. New Haven: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
  2. Akram-Lodhi, H. (2013). How to build food sovereignty. In Conference paper for discussion at Food sovereignty: A critical dialogue, Yale University.Google Scholar
  3. Alkon, A. (2012). Black white and green: Farmers, markets, race and green economy. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alkon, A. H. (2013). Food justice, food sovereignty and the challenge of neoliberalism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Yale.Google Scholar
  5. Balaguer Callejón, F. (2005). Die europäische Verfassung auf dem Weg zum Europäischen Verfassungsrecht. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 55, 337.Google Scholar
  6. Baumann, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brem-Wilson, J. (2010). The reformed Committee on World Food Security. A briefing paper for civil society. IPC & Mundubat. http://www.foodsovereignty.org/Portals/0/documenti%20sito/Home/News/reformed%20CFS_english.pdf.
  8. Bunte, F., & Dagevos, J. C. (2009). The food economy: Global issues and challenges. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camilleri, J. A. (2002). Major structural reform. In E. Aksu & J. A. Camilleri (Eds.), Democratizing global governance (pp. 255–271). Palgrave MacMillan: Houndmills.Google Scholar
  10. Clotet Banus, R., et al. (2010). Human development and food: A global vision. In C. M. Romeo & L. Escajedo (Eds.), Global food security: Ethical and legal challenges. Wageningen Academics Publishers: Wageningen.Google Scholar
  11. Contreras, J., & García, M. (2005). Alimentación y Cultura, perspectivas antropológicas. Ariel, Madrid.Google Scholar
  12. De Tavernier, J. (2012). Food citizenship: Is there a duty for responsible consumption? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Declaration at the Parallel Rome forum. (1997). Profit for some or food for all: Food sovereignty and the elimination of the globalization of hunger.Google Scholar
  14. Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2009). Consequences of the EC framework of health claims made on food: Are we protecting the consumer by means of human trials? In K. Millar, et al. (Eds.), Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons. Wageningen Academics Publishers: Wageningen.Google Scholar
  15. Ferrajoli, L. (2010). Más allá de la soberanía y la ciudadanía: Un constitucionalismo global. In: Carbonell, M., & Vázquez, R.(comps.), Estado constitucional y globalización. México: Porrúa.Google Scholar
  16. Ferrarese, M. R. (2001). Las instituciones jurídicas de la globalización. Revista Jueces para la Democracia, 21, 22–31.Google Scholar
  17. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2005). The state of food insecurity in the world 2005. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2005). Voluntary guidelines to support the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food security. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  19. Forum Sovranità Alimentare. (2007). Declaration of the forum for food sovereignty. Nyéléni Village: Sélingué. http://www.nyeleni.org/spip.php?article290.
  20. García Canclini, N. (1995). Consumidores y Ciudadanos. Grijalbo, Mexico: Conflictos multiculturales de la globalización.Google Scholar
  21. González Vaqué, L. (2004). El principio de precaución en la jurisprudencia del tribunal de justicia de las comunidades europeas: ¿un principio de buen gobierno? Estudios sobre consumo, 68, 17–21.Google Scholar
  22. González Vaqué, L. (2005). El principio de precaución: Incertidumbre científica, riesgos hipotéticos y decisión política. Revista Aranzadi de Derecho Ambiental, 7, 97–113.Google Scholar
  23. Guthman, J. (2008). Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practice. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Häberle, P. (2004). Normatividad y reformabilidad de la Constitución desde las Ciencias de la Cultura. In: Nueve Ensayos Constitucionales y una Lección Jubilar. Peru: Ed. Palestra.Google Scholar
  25. Halkier, B. (1999). Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holt-Gimenez, E. (2011). Food security, food justice or food sovereignity? Crises, food movements and regime change. In A. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice; race, class and sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food wars: The global battle for mouths. Earthscan, London: Minds and Markets.Google Scholar
  28. Marks, G. (1992). Structural policy in the European Community. In Sbragia (Ed.), Europolitics, institutions and policymaking in the New European Community, pp. 191–225.Google Scholar
  29. Matteucci, N. (1963). Positivismo giuridico e costituzionalismo. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, pp. 1041–1052.Google Scholar
  30. McKeon, N. (2011). global governance for world food security: A scorecard four years after the eruption of the ‘food crisis’. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Stiftung.Google Scholar
  31. McMichael, P. (2001). Revisiting the question of the transnational state? Theory and Society, 30, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMichael, P. (2013). Historicizing food sovereignity: A food regime perspective, en international conference food sovereignity: a critical dialogue. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  33. Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oosterveer, P. (2007). Global governance of food production and consumption. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  35. Page, E. A., & Redcliff, A. (2002). Human security and the environment international comparisons. Cheltenham: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pattel, R. (2007). Transgressing rights: La Via Campesina’s call for food sovereignity. Feminist Economics, 13(1), 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pattel, R. (2012). Stuffed and Starved: The hidden battle for the world food system, 2nd edn.Google Scholar
  38. Pernice, I. (1999). Multilevel constitutionalism and the treaty of Amsterdam: European constitution-making revisited? Common Market Law Review, 36, 703.Google Scholar
  39. Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multilevel governance. conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pimbert, M. (2009). Towards food sovereignty. London: Gatekeeper.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, W. I. (2001). Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational state. Theory and Society, 30, 157–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodríguez Fuentes, V. Derecho Agroalimentario, Bosch, (2003).Google Scholar
  43. Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 88–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uzgalis, W. (2014). John Locke. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/locke/.
  45. Valente, F. L. S. (2010). It is time for a rights-based global strategic framework on food security and nutrition, in right to food and nutrition watch. FIAN: Challenges for global Governance.Google Scholar
  46. Warde, A. (1997). Consumption, food and taste (pp. 132–135). Manchester University: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Windfuhr, M. (1998). NGOs and the right to adequate food. In The right to food in theory and practice, FAO.Google Scholar
  48. Windfuhr, M., & Jonsen, J. (2005). Food sovereignty: Towards democracy in localized food systems. FIAN, ITDG Publishing.Google Scholar
  49. Ziegler, J. (2001). The right to food E/CN. 4/2001/53.Google Scholar
  50. Zwart, H. (2000). A short history of food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 113–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Constitutional Law and History of Political ThoughtUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations