From Food Justice to a Tool of the Status Quo: Three Sub-movements Within Local Food
- 1.1k Downloads
The local food movement has been touted by some as a profoundly effective way to make our food system become more healthy, just, and sustainable. Others have criticized the movement as being less a challenge to the status quo and more an easily co-opted support offering just another set of choices for affluent consumers. In this paper, we analyze three distinct sub-movements within the local food movement, the individual-focused sub-movement, the systems-focused sub-movement, and the community-focused sub-movement. These movements can be combined within any particular campaign or within the goals of any particular organization or individual activist, but they are nevertheless quite different from each other, and come out of different conceptualizations of what food, people, and locality are. We argue that most of the critiques leveled against local food are actually directed against the individual-focused sub-movement, which is most compatible with the current industrial food system, and perhaps not surprisingly receives the most mainstream attention. Further, we argue that while each movement has its own strengths and weaknesses, it is the community-focused sub-movement that has the most potential to radically transform the global food system.
KeywordsLocal food Food justice Food security Food sovereignty Ethical consumption
- Campesina, V. (2009). Nyéléni declaration. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 673–676.Google Scholar
- Chicagoist. (2009). Walmart hosts a ‘‘farmer’s market,’’ avoids most farmers. http://chicagoist.com/2009/07/22walmart_hosts_a_farmers_market_avoi.php. Accessed 22 July 2012.
- Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Crib, J. (2010). The coming famine: The global food crisis and what we can do to avoid it. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Dahlberg, K. A. (1993). Regenerative food systems: Broadening the scope and agenda of sustainability. In P. Allen (Ed.), Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against method. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2003). Trade reforms and food security: Conceptualizing the linkages. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4671e/y4671e00.htm. Accessed 22 Dec 2012.
- Gottlieb, R., & Joshi, A. (2010). Food justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian dreams: The paradox of organic farming in California. Berkeley: UC.Google Scholar
- Horgen, K. B. (2001). Promoting healthy food choices: A health message and economic incentive intervention. Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
- Kingsolver, B., Kingsolver, C., & Hopp, S. (2008). Animal, vegetable, miracle: A year of food life. New York: Harper Inc.Google Scholar
- Lyson, T. A. (2004). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
- Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, S. (2009). The corporate co-opt of local. The Wire. 7 August. http://www.ilsr.org/corporate-coopt-local/. Accessed 22 Dec 2012.
- Pollan, M. (2009). A Defense of food: An eater’s manifesto. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Pollan, M. (2010). The food movement, rising. The New York Review of Books, June.Google Scholar
- Schanbacher, W. (2010). The politics of food: The global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Vandermeer, J., & Perfecto, I. (2005). Breakfast of biodiversity: The political ecology of rainforest destruction. Berkeley: Food First Books.Google Scholar
- Whittman, H. (2010). Food sovereignty: Reconnecting food, nature, and community (p. 2010). Oakland: Food First Books.Google Scholar