Telos and the Ethics of Animal Farming

Articles

Abstract

The concept of animal welfare in confinement agriculture—and an ethical theory based upon this concept—necessitates an idea of what kind of being it is that fares well and what “well” is for this being. This double-question is at the heart of understanding and adequately defining welfare as qualitatively embedded in the experiencing subject. The notion of telos derives (philosophically) from Aristotle and is a way of accounting for the good life of an animal from the unique speciesness of the animal in question. The first part of the article will address the contemporary philosophical and ethical analysis of animals based upon this Aristotelian idea (Rollin in Animal rights and human morality (1st ed. 1981). Prometheus Books, New York, 2006b). Telos is here employed to illustrate the dimensions of what matters in welfare assessment and ethical evaluation. The second half of the article addresses some of the welfare problems in modern animal agriculture and how they relate to the telos concept. Two main examples are dealt with: Boredom (Wemelsfelder in Mental health and well-being in animals. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2005) is argued as being the suffering of choicelessness in animals that are inherently beings that choose—and loneliness is the suffering of social isolation in animals for whom standing in active relations to others is part of what they are.

Keywords

Animal ethics Animal welfare Telos Farming Boredom Loneliness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Dr. Ulrik Becker Nissen at the Centre for Bioethics, and Nanoethics, Aarhus University and senior scientist Birte Lindstrøm Nielsen from Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) for comments and constructive criticism on the drafts for this article. Furthermore, I wish to thank Distinguished Professor Bernard E. Rollin from Colorado State University for his sharp and helpful reviews of the earliest versions of the article.

References

  1. Alstrup, A. K. O., & Hansen, A. K. (2009). Status over forbruget af forsøgsdyr siden år 2000. Ugeskrift for Laeger, 171(43), 3088.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, (2004). On the parts of animals (originally around 350 BC). Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publication Co.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, G. W. (1985). Associations and social behaviour. In A. F. Fraser (Ed.), Ethology of farm animals (pp. 233–248). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  4. Bekoff, M. (2000). Animal emotions: Exploring passionate natures. BioScience, 50, 861–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broom, D. M., & Johnson, K. G. (1993). Stress and animal welfare. London: Chapman & Hale.Google Scholar
  6. Buitenhuis, A. J., Kjaer, J. B., Labouriau, R., & Juul-Madsen, H. R. (2006). Altered circulating levels of serotonin and immunological changes in laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior. Poultry Science, 85, 1722–1728.Google Scholar
  7. Ewbank, R. (1969). Behavioural implications of intensive animal husbandry. Outlook on Agriculture, 6(1), 41–46.Google Scholar
  8. Færevik, G., Jensen, M. B., & Bøe, K. E. (2006). Dairy calves social preferences and the significance of a companion animal during separation from the group. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 99, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frankfurt, H. G. (1982). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In G. Watson (Ed.), Free will (pp. 81–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gabriel, M. A. (1988). Boredom: Exploration of a developmental perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 16(2), 156–164.Google Scholar
  11. Harfeld, J. (2011). Philosophical ethology: On the extents of what it is to be a pig. Society and Animals, 19, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haynes, R. P. (2008). Animal welfare—Competing conceptions and their ethical implications. Dordrecht: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  13. Hermes, G. L., Delgado, B., Tretiakova, M., Cavigelli, S. A., Krausz, T., Conzen, S. D., et al. (2009). Social isolation dysregulates endocrine and behavioral stress while increasing malignant burden of spontaneous mammary tumors. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/12/10/0910753106.full.pdf+html. Accessed April 1, 2010.
  14. Jensen, M. B., & Budde, M. (2006). The effects of milk feeding method and group size on feeding behavior and cross-sucking in group-housed dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 4778–4783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kay, R., & Hall, C. (2009). The use of a mirror reduces isolation stress in horses being transported by trailer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krebs, J. R. (1979). Optimal foraging: Decision rules for predators. In J. R. Krebs (Ed.), Behavioural ecology (pp. 23–63). Guildford, Great Britain: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Levitis, D. A., Lidicker, W. Z., Jr., & Freunda, G. (2009). Behavioural biologists do not agree on what constitutes behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 78, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  19. Manning, A., & Dawkins, M. S. (1998). An introduction to animal behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, M., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McEwen, B. S. (2000). The neurobiology of stress: From serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Research, 886, 172–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McFarland, D. (1981). The Oxford companion to animal behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mill, J. S. (1998). Three essays on religion (originally published between 1850 and 1870). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  25. Munksgaard, L., & Simonsen, H. B. (1996). Behavioral and pituitary adrenal axis responses of dairy cows to social isolation and deprivation of lying down. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 769–779.Google Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of justice—disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pratchett, T. (1992). Witches abroad. Reading, Great Britain: Corgi Books.Google Scholar
  28. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rollin, B. E. (1998a). On telos and genetic engineering. In A. Holland & A. Johnson (Eds.), Animal biotechnology and ethics (pp. 156–172). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Rollin, B. E. (1998b). The unheeded cryAnimal consciousness, animal pain, and science (1st ed. 1989). Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rollin, B. E. (2006a). Science and ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rollin, B. E. (2006b). Animal rights and human morality (1st ed. 1981). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  33. Rooijen, Jv. (1991). Predictability and boredom. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 31, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruis, M. A. W., te Brake, J. H. A., Engel, B., Buist, W. G., Blokhuis, H. J., & Koolhaas, J. M. (2001). Adaptation to social isolation: Acute and long-term stress responses of growing gilts with different coping characteristics. Physiology and Behavior, 73, 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stolba, A., & Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1981). Behavior of pigs and the design of a new housing system. Applied Animal Ethology, 8, 583–585.Google Scholar
  37. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tuchscherer, M., Kanitz, E., Puppe, B., & Tuchscherer, A. (2006). Early social isolation alters behavioral and physiological responses to an endotoxin challenge in piglets. Hormones and Behavior, 50, 753–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veissier, I., Boissy, A., Desire, L., & Greiveldinger, L. (2009). Animals’ emotions: Studies in sheep using appraisal theories. Animal Welfare, 18, 347–354.Google Scholar
  41. Wemelsfelder, F. (2005). Animal boredom: Understanding the tedium of confined lives. In F. McMillan (Ed.), Mental health and well-being in animals (pp. 79–92). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Zwart, H. (1997). What is an animal? A philosophical reflection on the possibility of a moral relationship with animals. Environmental Values, 6, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Bioethics and NanoethicsAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations