Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 895–907 | Cite as

Food Citizenship: Is There a Duty for Responsible Consumption?

  • Johan De TavernierEmail author


Labeling of food consumption is related to food safety, food quality, environmental, safety, and social concerns. Future politics of food will be based on a redefinition of commodity food consumption as an expression of citizenship. “Citizen-consumers” realize that they could use their buying power in order to develop a new terrain of social agency and political action. It takes for granted kinds of moral selfhood in which human responsibility is bound into human agency based on knowledge and recognition. This requires new kinds of food labeling practices. Existing research on consumer’s preferences often fails to recognize the full complexity of the motivations and intentions through which the identity of the moral self is built up in relation to food consumption practices. For citizens, not only food production practices matter but also the impact of what we eat on who we are and the ecological foot print of our food stuff. Two major drivers for this are the idea that we ourselves have to take care of our own bodies (“We are what we eat”) and that we are responsible for Planet Earth. Since both obesity and climate change have become major public concerns, also governments develop an increasing interest in defining how citizens ought to behave as consumers and how retailers and producers should facilitate such responsible behavior. Since they are supposed to defend the “bonum commune,” e.g., the public health of their citizens and a sound common future for all, a new consensus on “appropriate” consumption choices has to be found, balancing beneficence and autonomy.


Food consumption Ethical consumption Food citizenship Food ethics 



I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for their helpful comments.


  1. Allhoff, F., Lin, P., & Moore, D. (2010). What is nanotechnology and why does it matter?: From science to ethics. London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andorno, R. (2004). The right-not-to-know: An autonomy based approach. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2008). Does ethics have a chance in a world of consumers? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bawa, R., & Johnson, S. (2008). Emerging issues in nanomedicine and ethics. In F. Allhoff & P. Lin (Eds.), Nanotechnology and society: Current and emerging ethical issues (pp. 207–224). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beekman, V. (2008). Consumer rights to informed choice on the food market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenkert, G. (2009). Marketing ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Coff, C. (2006). The taste for ethics: An ethic of food consumption. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Dévényi, P. (2011). The new regulation on the provision of food information to consumers—is new always better? European Food and Feed Law Review, 4, 210–217.Google Scholar
  10. Devisch, I. (2010). Everything you always wanted to eat but were afraid of consuming it. In S. Vandamme, S. van de Vathorst & I. de Beaufort (Eds.), Food, responsibility, behaviour: The case of homer Simpson (pp. 69–77). Leuven-Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
  11. Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self, vol. III—the moral limits of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Feinberg, J. (1992). Freedom and fulfillment. Philosophical essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, G. G., & Hamide, S. (2009). Overweight, obesity, and related diseases. In W. Pond, B. L. Nichols & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Adequate food for all. Culture, science, and technology of food in the 21st century (pp. 129–139). London-New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, E., & Dulsrud, A. (2007). Will consumers save the world? The framing of political consumerism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 20, 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jotterand, F. (2007). Nanomedicine: How it could reshape clinical practice. Nanomedicine, 2(4), 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kittay, E. (2007). Beyond autonomy and paternalism. In T. Nys, Y. Denier & T. Vandevelde (Eds.), Autonomy and paternalism (pp. 23–70). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  18. Kunkel, H. O. (2000). Human issues in animal agriculture. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Nys, H. (2005). The Belgian law of August 22, 2002 concerning the rights of patients. In Yearbook of European medical law (pp. 91–100). Lidingö (Sweden): The Institute of Medical Law.Google Scholar
  21. Sooyoung, C., & Krasser, A. (2011). What makes us care? The impact of cultural values, individual factors, and attention to media content on motivation for ethical consumerism. International Social Science Review, 86(1/2), 3–23.Google Scholar
  22. Thompson, P. B. (2007). Food biotechnology in ethical perspective. The international library of environmental, agricultural and food ethics (Vol. 10). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. VanDe Veer, D. (1986). Paternalistic intervention: The moral bounds on benevolence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Vo-Dinh, T. (2007). Nanotechnology in biology and medicine: Methods, devices, and applications. London-New York: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward, J., & de Vreese, C. (2011). Political consumerism, young citizens, and the internet. Media, Culture and Society, 33, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Science Technology and EthicsKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations