Finfish Aquaculture: Animal Welfare, the Environment, and Ethical Implications



The aim of this review is to assess the ethical implications of finfish aquaculture, regarding fish welfare and environmental aspects. The finfish aquaculture industry has grown substantially the last decades, both as a result of the over-fishing of wild fish populations, and because of the increasing consumer demand for fish meat. As the industry is growing, a significant amount of research on the subject is being conducted, monitoring the effects of aquaculture on the environment and on animal welfare. The areas of concern when it comes to animal welfare have here been divided into four different stages: breeding period; growth period; capturing and handling; and slaughter. Besides these stages, this report includes a chapter on the current evidence of fish sentience, since this issue is still being debated among biologists. However, most biologists are at present acknowledging the probability of fish being sentient creatures. Current aquaculture practices are affecting fish welfare during all four of the cited stages, both on physical and mental levels, as well as on the ability of fish to carry out natural behaviors. The effect fish farming has on the environment is here separated into five different categories: the decline of wild fish populations; waste and chemical discharge; loss of habitat; spreading of diseases; and invasion of exotic organisms. There is evidence of severe negative effects on the environment when looking at these five categories, even when considering the difficulty of studying environmental effects, due to the closely interacting variables. The ethical arguments and scientific evidences here reviewed have not all come to the same conclusions. Nevertheless, the general agreement is that current aquaculture practices are neither meeting the needs of fish nor environment. Thus, the obvious environmental and animal welfare aspects of finfish aquaculture make it hard to ethically defend a fish diet.


Aspects of animal welfare in fish Ethics and animal welfare Aquaculture Fish sentience Environmental impact of aquaculture Humane slaughter 



We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.


  1. Afonso, J. M., Montero, D., Robaina, L., Astorga, N., Izquierdo, M. S., & Ginés, R. (2000). Association of a lordosis-scoliosis-kyphosis deformity in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) with family structure. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 22, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algers, B., Blokhuis, H., Boetner, A., Broom, D. M., Costa, P., Domingo, M., et al. (2009). Scientific opinion: General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. EFSA Journal, 954, 1–27.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (2009). Manual on control of malformations in fish aquaculture. Edited by Fine Fish. Industrial Associative Grouping—Project Coordinator. Federation of European Aquaculture Producers. Accessed 29 August 2011.
  4. Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., Schwab, A., & Cowx, I. G. (2007). Fish welfare: A challenge to the feeling-based approach, with implications for recreational fishing. Fish and Fisheries, 8, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashley, P. J. (2007). Fish welfare: Current issues in aquaculture. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 104, 199–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcombe, J. (2009). Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 118, 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyd, C. E., & Massaut, L. (1999). Risks associated with the use of chemicals in pond aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering, 20, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broom, D. M. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Supplementum, 27, 22–28.Google Scholar
  9. Burridge, L. E., Haya, K., & Waddy, S. L. (2008). The effect of repeated exposure to azamethiphos on survival and spawning in the American lobster (Homarus americanus). Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety, 69, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buschmann, A. H., Riquelme, V. A., Hernández-González, M. C., Varela, D., Jiménez, J. E., Henríquez, L. A., et al. (2006). A review of the impacts of salmonid farming on marine coastal ecosystems in the southeast Pacific. Journal of Marine Science, 63, 1338–1345.Google Scholar
  11. Chandroo, K. P., Duncan, I. J. H., & Mocciaet, R. D. (2004). Can fish suffer?: Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 86, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa-Pierce, B. A. (2003). The ‘Blue Revolution’—aquaculture must go green. World Aquaculture, 1–5 (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Dempster, T., & Holmer, M. (2009). Introducing the new multidisciplinary journal aquaculture environment interactions. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
  14. Diana, J. S. (2009). Aquaculture production and biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 59, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donaldson, E. M. (1996). Manipulation of reproduction in farmed fish. Animal Reproduction Science, 42, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duarte, C. M., Holmer, M., Olsen, Y., Soto, D., Marba, N., Guiu, J., et al. (2009). Will the oceans help feed humanity? BioScience, 59, 967–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duncan, I. J. H. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Supplementum, 27, 29–35.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, T., North, B., Scott, A. P., Bromage, N. R., Porter, M., & Gadd, D. (2002). The relationship between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 493–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ervik, A., Hansen, P. K., Aure, J., Stigebrandt, A., Johannessen, P., & Jahnsen, T. (1997). Regulating the local environmental impact of intensive marine fish farming: II. The concept of the MOM system (Modelling-Ongrowing fish farms-Monitoring). Aquaculture, 158, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandes, T. F., Eleftheriou, A., Ackefors, H., Eleftheriou, M., Ervik, A., Sanchez-Mata, A., et al. (2001). The scientific principles underlying the monitoring of the environmental impacts of aquaculture. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 17, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Akbarashandiz, H., Sakhrani, D., Biagi, C. A., Pitcher, T. E., & Devlin, R. H. (2011). Cultured growth hormone transgenic salmon are reproductively out-competed by wild-reared salmon in semi-natural mating arenas. Aquaculture, 312(1–4), 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2010). The state of world fisheries and Aquaculture 2010, Accessed 16 juni 2011.
  23. Ford, J. S., & Myers, R. A. (2008). A global assessment of salmon aquaculture impacts on wild salmonids. PLoS Biology 6(2): e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060033. PMID:18271629.
  24. Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Miligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 174–186.Google Scholar
  25. Garrett, E. S., dos Santos, C. L., & Jahncke, M. L. (1997). Public, animal, and environmental health implications of aquaculture. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 3, 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gatica, M. C., Monti, G., Gallo, C., Knowles, T. G., & Warriss, P. D. (2008). Effects of well-boat transportation on the muscle pH and onset of rigor mortis in Atlantic salmon. Veterinary Record, 163, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gillund, F., & Myhr, A. (2010). Perspectives on salmon feed: a deliberative assessment of several alternative feed resources. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gjerde, B., Pante, M. J. R., & Baeverfjord, G. (2005). Genetic variation for a vertebral deformity in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture, 244, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodland, R. (1997). Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters. Ecological Economics, 23, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grigorakis, K. (2009). Ethical issues in aquaculture production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9210-5.
  31. Håstein, T., Scarfe, A. D., & Lund, V. L. (2005). Science-based assessment of welfare: Aquatic animals, review of science and technology. Office International des Epizooties, 24, 529–547.Google Scholar
  32. Haya, K., Burridge, L. E., & Chang, B. D. (2001). Environmental impact of chemical wastes produced by the salmon aquaculture industry. Journal of Marine Science, 58, 492–496.Google Scholar
  33. Höglund, E., Jørgensen Bakke, M., Øverli, Ø., Winberg, S., & Nilsson, G. E. (2005). Suppression of aggressive behavior in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) by l-tryptophan supplementation. Aquaculture, 249, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holmlund, C. M., & Hammer, M. (1999). Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics, 29, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huntingford, F. A., Adams, C., Braithwaite, V. A., Kadri, S., Pottinger, T. G., Sandøe, P., et al. (2006). Current issues in fish welfare. Journal of Fish Biology, 68, 332–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Imsland, A. K., Foss, A., Koedijk, R., Folkvord, A., Stefansson, S. O., & Jonassen, T. M. (2006). Short- and long-term differences in growth, feed conversion efficiency and deformities in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) startfed on rotifers or zooplankton. Aquaculture Research, 37, 1015–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaiser, M., & Stead, S. M. (2002). Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture: communication, management and policy issues in times of “changing public perceptions”. Aquaculture International, 10, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kolstad, K., Thorland, I., Refstie, T., & Gjerde, B. (2006). Genetic variation and genotype by location interaction in body weight, spinal deformity and sexual maturity in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) reared at different locations off Norway. Aquaculture, 259, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krkošek, M., Lewis, M. A., & Volpe, J. P. (2005). Transmission dynamics of parasitic sea lice from farm to wild salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krkošek, M., Lewis, M. A., Morton, A., Frazer, L. N., & Volpe, J. P. (2006). Epizootics of wild fish induced by farm fish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 15506–15510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krkošek, M., Ford, J. S., Morton, A., Lele, S., Myers, R. A., & Lewis, M. A. (2007). Declining wild salmon populations in relation to parasites from farm salmon. Science, 318, 1772–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lambooij, E., Kloosterboer, R. J., Gerritzen, M. A., & van de Vis, J. W. (2004). Head-only electrical stunning and bleeding of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus): assessment of loss of consciousness. Animal Welfare, 13, 71–76.Google Scholar
  43. Lund, V., & Röcklinsberg, H. (2001). Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14, 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lund, V., Mejdell, C. M., Röcklinsberg, H., Anthony, R., & Håstein, T. (2007). Expanding the moral circle: farmed fish as objects of moral concern. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 75, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Midtlyng, P. J., Grave, K., & Horsberg, T. E. (2011). What has been done to minimize the use of antibacterial and antiparasitic drugs in Norwegian aquaculture? Aquaculture Research, 42, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Naylor, R., & Burke, M. (2005). Aquaculture and ocean resources: Raising tigers of the sea. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naylor, R. L., Goldburg, R. J., Primavera, J. H., Kautsky, N., Beveridge, M. C. M., Clay, J., et al. (2000). Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature, 405, 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Naylor, R., Hindar, K., Fleming, I. A., Goldburg, R., Williams, S., Volpe, J., et al. (2005). Fugitive salmon: Assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience, 55, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Naylor, R. L., Hardy, R. W., Bureau, D. P., Chiu, A., Elliott, M., Farrell, A. P., et al. (2009). Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15103–15110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olesen, I., Myhr, A. I., & Rosendal, G. K. (2010). Sustainable aquaculture: are we getting there? Ethical perspectives on salmon farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 24, 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poli, B. M., Parisi, G., Scappini, F., & Zampacavallo, G. (2005). Fish welfare and quality as affected by pre-slaughter and slaughter management. Aquaculture International, 13, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Potts, G. W. (1973). The Ethology of Labroides dimidiatus (Cuv. & Val.) (Labridae, Pisces) on Aldabra. Animal Behavior, 21, 250–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Robb, D. H. F., Wotton, S. B., McKinstry, J. L., Sorensen, N. K., Kestin, S. C., & Sorensen, N. K. (2000). Commercial slaughter methods used on Atlantic salmon: Determination of the onset of brain failure by electroencephalography. The Veterinary Record, 147, 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rollin, B. E. (1993). Animal welfare, science and value. Journal agricultural and environmental ethics, 6(Suppl. 2), 44–50.Google Scholar
  55. Rose, J. D. (2002). The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 10, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soto, D., & Norambuena, F. (2004). Evaluation of salmon farming effects on marine systems in the inner seas of southern Chile: A large-scale mensurative experiment. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 20, 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. St-Cyr, S., & Aubin-Horth, N. (2009). Integrative and genomics approaches to uncover the mechanistic base of fish behavior and its diversity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 152, 9–21.Google Scholar
  58. Streftaris, N., Zenetos, A., & Papathanassiou, E. (2005). Globalisation in marine ecosystems: The story of non-indigenous marine species across European seas. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 43, 419–453.Google Scholar
  59. Toranzo, A. E., Magariños, B., & Romalde, J. L. (2005). A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture, 246, 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tufto, J., & Hindar, K. (2003). Effective size in management and conservation of subdivided populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 222, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turnbull, J., Bell, A., Adams, C., Bron, J., & Huntingford, F. (2005). Stocking density and welfare of cage farmed Atlantic salmon: Application of a multivariate analysis. Aquaculture, 243, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van der Vis, H., Kestin, S., Robb, D., Oehlenschläger, J., Lambooij, B., Münkner, W., et al. (2003). Is humane slaughter of fish possible for industry? Aquaculture Research, 34, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vazzana, M., Cammarata, M., Cooper, E. L., & Parrinello, N. (2002). Confinement stress in sea bass (Dicentrarchuslabrax) depresses peritoneal leukocyte cytotoxicity. Aquaculture, 210, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Sioen, I., Van Camp, J., & De Henauw, S. (2007). Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish: A consumer behavior perspective. Ambio, 36, 580–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verheijen, F. I., & Flight, W. F. G. (1997). Decapitation and brining: Experimental tests show that after these commercial methods for slaughtering eel Angullla anguilla (L.), death is not instantaneous. Aquaculture Research, 28, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal Environment and HealthSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)SkaraSweden

Personalised recommendations