Finfish Aquaculture: Animal Welfare, the Environment, and Ethical Implications
- 1.3k Downloads
The aim of this review is to assess the ethical implications of finfish aquaculture, regarding fish welfare and environmental aspects. The finfish aquaculture industry has grown substantially the last decades, both as a result of the over-fishing of wild fish populations, and because of the increasing consumer demand for fish meat. As the industry is growing, a significant amount of research on the subject is being conducted, monitoring the effects of aquaculture on the environment and on animal welfare. The areas of concern when it comes to animal welfare have here been divided into four different stages: breeding period; growth period; capturing and handling; and slaughter. Besides these stages, this report includes a chapter on the current evidence of fish sentience, since this issue is still being debated among biologists. However, most biologists are at present acknowledging the probability of fish being sentient creatures. Current aquaculture practices are affecting fish welfare during all four of the cited stages, both on physical and mental levels, as well as on the ability of fish to carry out natural behaviors. The effect fish farming has on the environment is here separated into five different categories: the decline of wild fish populations; waste and chemical discharge; loss of habitat; spreading of diseases; and invasion of exotic organisms. There is evidence of severe negative effects on the environment when looking at these five categories, even when considering the difficulty of studying environmental effects, due to the closely interacting variables. The ethical arguments and scientific evidences here reviewed have not all come to the same conclusions. Nevertheless, the general agreement is that current aquaculture practices are neither meeting the needs of fish nor environment. Thus, the obvious environmental and animal welfare aspects of finfish aquaculture make it hard to ethically defend a fish diet.
KeywordsAspects of animal welfare in fish Ethics and animal welfare Aquaculture Fish sentience Environmental impact of aquaculture Humane slaughter
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- Algers, B., Blokhuis, H., Boetner, A., Broom, D. M., Costa, P., Domingo, M., et al. (2009). Scientific opinion: General approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. EFSA Journal, 954, 1–27.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. (2009). Manual on control of malformations in fish aquaculture. Edited by Fine Fish. Industrial Associative Grouping—Project Coordinator. Federation of European Aquaculture Producers. http://www.aquamedia.org/finefish/manual/manual_en.asp. Accessed 29 August 2011.
- Broom, D. M. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Supplementum, 27, 22–28.Google Scholar
- Buschmann, A. H., Riquelme, V. A., Hernández-González, M. C., Varela, D., Jiménez, J. E., Henríquez, L. A., et al. (2006). A review of the impacts of salmonid farming on marine coastal ecosystems in the southeast Pacific. Journal of Marine Science, 63, 1338–1345.Google Scholar
- Costa-Pierce, B. A. (2003). The ‘Blue Revolution’—aquaculture must go green. World Aquaculture, 1–5 (in press).Google Scholar
- Dempster, T., & Holmer, M. (2009). Introducing the new multidisciplinary journal aquaculture environment interactions. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
- Duncan, I. J. H. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Supplementum, 27, 29–35.Google Scholar
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2010). The state of world fisheries and Aquaculture 2010, http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e01.pdf. Accessed 16 juni 2011.
- Ford, J. S., & Myers, R. A. (2008). A global assessment of salmon aquaculture impacts on wild salmonids. PLoS Biology 6(2): e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060033. PMID:18271629.
- Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Miligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 174–186.Google Scholar
- Grigorakis, K. (2009). Ethical issues in aquaculture production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9210-5.
- Håstein, T., Scarfe, A. D., & Lund, V. L. (2005). Science-based assessment of welfare: Aquatic animals, review of science and technology. Office International des Epizooties, 24, 529–547.Google Scholar
- Haya, K., Burridge, L. E., & Chang, B. D. (2001). Environmental impact of chemical wastes produced by the salmon aquaculture industry. Journal of Marine Science, 58, 492–496.Google Scholar
- Imsland, A. K., Foss, A., Koedijk, R., Folkvord, A., Stefansson, S. O., & Jonassen, T. M. (2006). Short- and long-term differences in growth, feed conversion efficiency and deformities in juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) startfed on rotifers or zooplankton. Aquaculture Research, 37, 1015–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lambooij, E., Kloosterboer, R. J., Gerritzen, M. A., & van de Vis, J. W. (2004). Head-only electrical stunning and bleeding of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus): assessment of loss of consciousness. Animal Welfare, 13, 71–76.Google Scholar
- Rollin, B. E. (1993). Animal welfare, science and value. Journal agricultural and environmental ethics, 6(Suppl. 2), 44–50.Google Scholar
- St-Cyr, S., & Aubin-Horth, N. (2009). Integrative and genomics approaches to uncover the mechanistic base of fish behavior and its diversity. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 152, 9–21.Google Scholar
- Streftaris, N., Zenetos, A., & Papathanassiou, E. (2005). Globalisation in marine ecosystems: The story of non-indigenous marine species across European seas. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 43, 419–453.Google Scholar