Captive Bears in Human–Animal Welfare Conflict: A Case Study of Bile Extraction on Asia’s Bear Farms

Articles

Abstract

Bear bile has long been used in the Asian traditional pharmacopoeia. Bear farming first started in China ~30 years ago in terms of reducing the number of poached bears and ensuring the supply of bear bile. Approximately 13,000 bears are today captivated on Asia’s bear farms: their teeth are broken and the claws are also pulled out for the sake of human safety; the bears are imprisoned in squeeze cages for years; and a catheter is daily inserted into a bear’s gall bladder or a tube is implanted inside its body in order to collect the dripped bile—captive bears moan in severe pain whenever the bile is extracted. When the bears cannot produce sufficient bile, they are often left to die of starvation. It must be impossible to justify the bile extraction from living bears because (1) medicinal/herbal alternatives are similar to bear bile; (2) there is no evidence to suggest that bear farming has any beneficial effects on wild bear populations; and (3) ethical problems lie not only in the painful bile extraction but also the whole lifecycle of captive bears. In conclusion, human welfare (health care) based on traditional medicine is upheld by sacrificing bear welfare. Since a trial calculation suggests that it is economically unfeasible to keep a proper balance between bear welfare and the traditional pharmacopeia, the cultivation of herbal alternatives seems to be a possible solution to phase out bear faming and maintain the practice of traditional medicine in Asia.

Keywords

Captive bear Bile EU resolution Traditional medicine Pain Welfare 

References

  1. Animals Asia Foundation (AAF). (2010). Vet centreRehabilitation. AAF. Retrieved on 15 February 2010, from www.animalsasia.org/index.php?UID=2AD1YQMT6SQ9.
  2. Animal Welfare Working Group (AWWG). (2006). Animal welfare. In Project Steering Committee (Ed.), Future of animal agriculture in North America (pp. 133–150). Oak Brook, UL: Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Association of Chinese Medicine and Philosophy and Earth Care (ACMPEC). (1994). The herbal alternatives to bear bile in Chinese medicine. Hong Kong: ACMPEC.Google Scholar
  4. Bannerman, R. H., Burton, J., & Chen, W. C. (1993). Traditional medicine and health care coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, J. H., & Lim, A. G. (1998). Human bile for animals. Lancet, 531, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bekoff, M. (2000). Strolling with our kin—Speaking for and respecting voiceless animals. Jenkintown, PA: American Anti-Vivisection Society.Google Scholar
  7. Blandford, D. (2006). Animal welfare. Choices, 21(3), 195–198.Google Scholar
  8. Blandford, D., Bureau, J. C., Fulponi, L., & Henson, S. (2002). Potential implications of animal welfare concerns and public policies in industrialized countries for international trade. In B. Krissoff, M. Bohman, & J. A. Caswell (Eds.), Global food trade and consumer demand for quality (pp. 77–101). New York, NY: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). (2006). MEPs demand action on bear farms. BBC News, press release on 10 January 2006. London: BBC.Google Scholar
  10. Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal welfare—Concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science, 69(10), 4167–4175.Google Scholar
  11. Burgoyene, D. (1999). International trade and animal welfare. Cahiers Agriculture, 8(6), 445–449.Google Scholar
  12. Church, J. S. (2000). Understanding pain and its relevance to animals. Calgary: Alberta Farm Animal Care Association.Google Scholar
  13. Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics (CCIC). (2008). Take the leap to cruelty-free products. CCIC. Retrieved on 16 February 2010, from www.leapingbunny.org.
  14. Cochrane, G. M. (2003). Problems associated with the free-dripping fistula technique as a method of bile extraction from Asiatic black bears, #Vet/Report/03. Hong Kong: Animals Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. DeGrazia, D. (2002). Animal rights—A very short introduction. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Denver Zoo (2008). Animal description—Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus). Denver, CO: Denver Zoological Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Ekelund, R. B. J., & Hebert, R. F. (1997). A history of economic theory and method. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, R. (2005). Tiger bone and rhino horn—The destruction of wildlife for traditional Chinese medicine. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  19. Faver, C. A., & Strand, E. B. (2003). Domestic violence and animal cruelty. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(2), 237–253.Google Scholar
  20. Feng, Y., Luo, W. Q., & Zhu, S. Q. (2008). Explore new clinical application of Huanglian and corresponding compound prescriptions from their traditional use. Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 33, 1221–1225.Google Scholar
  21. Feng, Y., Siul, K., Wang, N., Ng, K. M., Tsao, S. W., Nagamatsu, T., & Tong, Y. (2009). Bear bile—Dilemma of traditional medicinal use and animal protection. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-5-2.
  22. Fisher, J. (1998). Nongovernments—NGOs and the political development of the third world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  23. Flynn, C. P. (2001). Acknowledging the ‘‘zoological connection’’—A sociological analysis of animal cruelty. Society and Animals, 9, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Freedman, B. (1989). Environmental ecology—The impacts of pollution and other stresses on ecosystem structure and function. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gao, X. M. (2002). Chinese materia medica. Beijing: Chinese Medicine Publisher.Google Scholar
  26. Griggs, B. (1999). Green pharmacy. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
  27. Haikui, H., & Zhi, L. (2007). Bear farming and bear conservation in China. In D. F. Williamson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on the trade of bear parts (pp. 37–49). Tokyo: TRAFFIC East Asia-Japan.Google Scholar
  28. Halls, S. (2007). Seventy-five percent of bear species threatened with extinction. IUCNAsia News, press release on 12 November 2007. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
  29. Harper, G., & Henson, S. (2005). Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice, EU FAIR #CT98-3678. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  30. Herzog, H., Rowan, A., & Kossow, D. (2001). Social attitudes to animals. In D. J. Salem & A. N. Rowan (Eds.), The state of animals (pp. 55–69). Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.Google Scholar
  31. Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). (2009). The unbearable trade. HSUS. Retrieved on 5 February 2010, from www.hsus.org/wildlife/issues_facing_wildlife/wildlife_trade.
  32. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Natural Resources (IUCN). (2007). IUCN red list of threatened species—Ursus thibetanus Asiatic black bear. Gland: IUCN Bear Specialist Group.Google Scholar
  33. Ishida, A. (2005). Bear gall bladder trade in Japan. Tokyo: TRAFFIC East Asia-Japan.Google Scholar
  34. Jayaraman, K. S. (2006). Break with tradition. Nature, 442, 342–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koene, P. (1998). Adaptation of blind brown bears to a new environment and its residents: Stereotype and play as welfare indicators. Ursus, 10, 579–587.Google Scholar
  36. Leatherhead Food Research Association (LFRA). (1999). FOMAD database. Leatherhead: LFRS.Google Scholar
  37. Loeffler, K., Robinson, J., & Cochrane, G. (2007). Compromised health and welfare of bears in China’s bear bile farming industry, with special reference to the free-dripping bile extraction technique, #Vet/Report/07. Hong Kong: Animals Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. McDonald, J. (2006). Push to end farming of bear bile fails. The Standard, press release on 13 January 2006. Hong Kong: The Standard Newspaper Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Meller, P. (2003). Europe: ban on animal tests for cosmetics. New York Times, press release on 17 January 2003. New York, NY: The New York Times Co.Google Scholar
  40. Mellor, D., Yeow, J., Hapidzal, N. F. M., Yamamoto, T., Yokoyama, A., & Nobuzane, Y. (2009). Childhood cruelty to animals—A tri-national study. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 40, 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mertz, L. A. (2004). Bears (Ursidae). In M. C. McDade (Ed.), Grzimerk’s animal life encyclopedia (Vol. 14, pp. 295–307). Farmington Hills, MI: Gale Group Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Mills, J. A. (1992). Milking the bear trade. International Wildlife, 22, 38–45.Google Scholar
  43. Moynagh, J. (2000). EU regulation and consumer demand for animal welfare. Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management and Economics (AgBioForum), 3, 77–83.Google Scholar
  44. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Maitra, U. (2004). Chemistry and biology of bile acids. Current Science, 87, 1666–1683.Google Scholar
  45. Nair, P. P., & Kritchevsky, D. (1973). Bile acid—Chemistry, physiology and metabolism. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nath, B., Hens, L., & Devuyst, D. (1996). Textbook on sustainable development. Brussels: VUB University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nette, T. (2009). Bear gallbladders to sell or not to sell. Nova Scotia Government. Retrieved on 10 February 2010, from www.gov.ns.ca/natr/wildlife/large-mammals/beargalls.asp.
  48. Oliver, E. (2002). Animal welfare in Japan. Animal People, 11, 6.Google Scholar
  49. Pong, S., Lo, Y. W., & Ho, K. C. (1999). Herbal alternatives to bear bile. In D. F. Williamson, J. Marcus & M. J. Phipps (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on the trade in bear parts (pp. 154–157). Seoul: TRAFFIC East Asia.Google Scholar
  50. Qui, J. (2007). Traditional medicines—A culture in the balance. Nature, 448, 126–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rath, B. (2005). Globalisation, global trend in herbal market, and the impact thereof on medicinal plants in Orissa. Orissa: VASUNDHARA.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, J. (2008). Lessons learned—Bear sanctuary management in China and Vietnam. Hong Kong: Animals Asia Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, J., Cocharane, G., & Loeffler, K. (2007). Discussion regarding the impact of bear bile farming upon wild bears in China and Vietnam. In D. F. Williamson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on trade in bear parts (pp. 67–73). Tokyo: TRAFFIC East Asia-Japan.Google Scholar
  54. Sergio, F., Newton, I., & Marchesi, L. (2005). Conservation—Top predators and biodiversity. Nature, 436, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Servheen, C. (1995). Bear farms and the impact on bear populations. In D. A. Rose & A. L. Gaski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on trade of bear parts for medicinal use (p. 31). Washington, DC: TRAFFIC North America.Google Scholar
  56. Shankar, D., & Venkatasubramanian, P. (2005). The evaluation of global standards for traditional medicine. London: Science and Development Network.Google Scholar
  57. State Pharmacopoeia Commission (SPC). (2005). Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2005 (English edition ed.). Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House.Google Scholar
  58. Teleosis Institute. (2007). The green health care program—Good for people and the environment. Berkeley, CA: Teleosis Institute.Google Scholar
  59. Togawa, K., & Sakamoto, M. (2002). Japan’s illegal trade in bear products—A threat to bears worldwide. Tokyo: Japan Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
  60. TRAFFIC International. (2008). What’s driving the wildlife trade? #46791. Washington, DC: East Asia and Pacific Region Sustainable Development Department of the World Bank.Google Scholar
  61. Viravaidya, M., & Hayssen, J. (2001). Strategies to strengthen NGO capacity in resource mobilization through business activities, UNAIDS Best Practice Collection #579. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.Google Scholar
  62. Wang, L. Y., Gao, X., Tong, Z. L., & Wang, X. G. (2005). Summary on pharmacological action and clinical study of the chemical composition of bear bile. Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, 22, 30–33.Google Scholar
  63. World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA). (2005a). The bear bile business—Supply and sources of bear products, section #1. London: WSPA Office.Google Scholar
  64. World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA). (2005b). Finding—Herbal alternatives to bear bile. London: WSPA Office.Google Scholar
  65. World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA). (2007). From cage to consumer—The global trade in bear parts, final report. London: WSPA Office.Google Scholar
  66. World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA). (2010). Wildlife. WSPA Office. Retrieved on 1 March 2010, from www.wspa-usa.org/pages/24_wildlife.cfm.
  67. Worldwatch Institute. (2007). Green job initiatives—Preliminary report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program.Google Scholar
  68. Yablokov, A. V. (1991). Conservation of living nature and resources—Problems, trends and prospects. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Escola Superior AgráriaInstituto Politécnico de CoimbraBencanta3040 CoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Solution, Seta CampusRyukoku UniversityOhtsuJapan

Personalised recommendations