Sustainable Aquaculture: Are We Getting There? Ethical Perspectives on Salmon Farming
- 1.9k Downloads
Aquaculture is the fastest growing animal producing sector in the world and is expected to play an important role in global food supply. Along with this growth, concerns have been raised about the environmental effects of escapees and pollution, fish welfare, and consumer health as well as the use of marine resources for producing fish feed. In this paper we present some of the major challenges salmon farming is facing today. We discuss issues of relevance to how to ensure sustainability, by focusing on animal production systems, breeding approaches, sources for feed ingredients, and genetic engineering strategies. Other crucial issues such as animal welfare, environmental quality, and ethics are elaborated with regard to relevance for the sustainability of aquaculture. Additionally, we comment on socio-economic distributive implications by intellectual property rights (IPR) strategies on access to genetic material and traceability. To improve sustainability of salmon farming we suggest that there is a need for new approaches to guide research, for identification of ethical issues, and for engaging stakeholders in resolving these challenges.
KeywordsSalmon farming Animal welfare Global food supply Genetic resources Intellectual property rights (IPR) Sustainability
Financial support from Research Council of Norway through the project “Stimulating sustainable innovation in aquaculture” (Project number 187970/S10) for this paper is acknowledged, as well as the funding by Nordforsk of the Nordic Network on Agriculture and Food Ethics. The authors will also thank Dr. Karl Shearer for valuable discussions and comments to the paper and the anonymous reviewer for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- Anonymous. (2004). Final report on the Indo-Norwegian collaborative projects (56 pp.). Bhubaneswar: Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (CIFA).Google Scholar
- Anonymous. (2009). Dagens husdyravl i et etisk perspektiv. (only available in Norwegian) http://www.radetfordyreetikk.no/2009/06/dagens-husdyravl-i-et-etisk-perspektiv/. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- Breivik, H., Thorstad, O. (2002). WO/2004/007654—a process for decreasing environmental pollutants in an oil or a fat, a volatile environmental pollutants decreasing working fluid, a health supplement, and an animal feed product. http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=IB2003002827&wo=2004007654.
- Breivik, H., & Thorstad, O. (2005). Removal of organic environmental pollutants from fish oil by short-path distillation. Lipid Technology, 17(3), 55–58.Google Scholar
- Chandroo, K. P., Duncan, I. J. H., Moccia, R. D., et al. (2004a). Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 86, 225–250.Google Scholar
- Cubitt, K. F., Winberg, S., Huntingford, F. A., Kadri, S., Crampton, V. O., & Øverli, Ø. (2008). Social hierarchies, growth and brain serotonin metabolism in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) kept under commercial rearing conditions. Physiology & behavior, 94, 529–535.Google Scholar
- Delgado, P. L., Price, L. H., Miller, H. L., Salomon, R. M., Aghajanian, G. K., Heninger, G. R., et al. (1994). Serotonin and the neurobiology of depression—effects of tryptophan depletion in drug-free depressed-patients. Archives of General Psychology, 51, 865–874.Google Scholar
- Directorate of Fisheries (2010) Marine protected areas. http://www.fiskeridir.no/english/fisheries/marine-protected-areas. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- Directorate of Fisheries (Fiskeridirektoratet) (2009) Nøkkeltall fra norsk havbruksnæring År 2008. (only available in Norwegian). http://www.fiskeridir.no/statistikk/akvakultur/statistiske-publikasjoner/noekkeltall-fra-norsk-havbruksnaering. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- EFSA (2009). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from European Commission on general approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. The EFSA Journal, 954, 1–26. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/954.htm. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- Etscheidt, J., & Manz, D. (1992). Suswasseraquaristik und tierarzliche Praxis. Teil 2: Untersuchungen zur artgerechten Haltung von Zierfuschen. Tierärztliche Praxis, 20, 221–226.Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer (2003) 58.0, 2nd edition, 21 March. A report to the Directorate General for the project ‘Life sciences in European society’ QLG7-CT-1999-00286.Google Scholar
- European Commission (2002). A strategy for the sustainable development of European aquaculture. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/aquaculture_processing/aquaculture/strategy_en.htm. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- FAO. (1992). Sustainable development and environment: FAO policies and actions, Stockholm 1972-Rio 1992. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- FAO (1995). Code of conduct on responsible fisheries. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, Rome. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/005/v9878e/v9878e00.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2009.
- FAO (2003). Genetically modified organisms and aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 989, Rome.Google Scholar
- Felt, U.,& Wynne, B. (2007). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. European Communities, Directorate-General for Research Science, Economy and Society. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf. 95 pp. Accessed 10 July 2009.
- Gillund, F.,& Myhr, A. I. (2010) Perspectives on Salmon feed—A deliberative assessment of several alternative feed resources. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, Available online 28 Jan.Google Scholar
- Greer, D., & Harvey, B. (2004). Blue genes. sharing and conserving the world’s aquatic genetic resources (p. 231). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Hægermark, W. Aa. (2009). Several advantages with purified feed oil. http://www.nofima.no/marin/en/nyhet/2009/08/several-advantages-with-purified-feed-oil. Accessed 29 April 2010.
- Hindar, K., & Jonsson, B. (1995). Impacts of aquaculture and hatcheries on wild fish. In D. P. Philipp, J. M. Epifanio, J. E. Marsden, & Claussen (Eds.), Protection of aquatic biodiversity. Proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3 (pp. 70–87). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing.Google Scholar
- Holm, J. C., Tuene, S., Fosseidengen, J. E. (1998). Halibut behavior as a means of asssessing suitability of ongrowth systems. Annual Science Conference, ICES. Casias, Portugal 16–19 Sept.Google Scholar
- Holmenkollen Guidelines (1999). Holmekollen Guidelines for sustainable aquaculture 1997. In: N. Svennevig, H. Reinertsen, M. New (Eds.) Sustainable Aquaculture (pp. 343–347) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Sustainable Aquaculture: Food for the future? November 2–5, 1997, Oslo, Norway: AA. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield.Google Scholar
- Jonsson, B., Boxaspen, K., Fiske P., Gjerde, B., Poppe, T., Wennevik, V. (2006). Interaksjoner mellom lakseoppdrett og villaks: Oppdatering av kunnskapen etter NOU 1999:9. Kunnskapsserien for laks og vannmiljø 2. pp. 80.Google Scholar
- Kamara, M., Coff, C., & Wynne, B. (2006). GMOs and sustainability: Contested visions, routes and drivers. Copenhagen: Report prepared for the Danish Council of Ethics.Google Scholar
- Kapuscinski, A. R., & Brister, D. J. (2001). Genetic impacts of aquaculture. In K. D. Black (Ed.), Environmental impacts of aquaculture (pp. 128–153). Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic press.Google Scholar
- Kjørstad, I. (2005). Welfare quality WP1.1 Consumers literature review country report Norway (p. 60). Oslo Norway: SIFO, National Institute for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- LMD (2008) St.meld. nr. 12 (2002-2003) Om dyrehold og dyrevelferd. (only available in Norwegian). http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/lmd/dok/regpubl/stmeld/20022003/Stmeld-nr-12-2002-2003-.html?id=196533. Accessed 28 April 2010.
- McGinnity, P., Prodöhl, P., Ferguson, A., Hynes, R., Maoiléidigh, N., Baker, N., et al. (2003). Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 270, 2443–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McGinnity, P., Stone, C., Taggart, J. B., Cooke, D., Cotter, D., Hynes, R., et al. (1997). Genetic impact of escaped farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) on native populations: use of DNA profiling to assess freshwater performance of wild, farmed, and hybrid progeny in a natural river environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54, 998–1008.Google Scholar
- McInerney, J. (2004). Animal Welfare, economics and policy. Report on a study for Defra. pp. 68.Google Scholar
- Muir, W. M., & Howard, R. D. (2001). Fitness component and ecological risk of transgenic release; A model using Japanese medaka (Oryzius latipes). American Naturalist, 159, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Muir, W. M., Schinkel, A. (2002). Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being. Proceedings from the 7th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Montpellier, France, communication no. 14–07.Google Scholar
- Myhr, A. I., Rosendal, G. K. (2009). GMO Assessment in Norway as Compared to EU Procedures: Societal Utility and Sustainable Development. DN-Utredning 2009-2 http://www.dirnat.no/content.ap?thisId=582 Accessed 15 Jan 2009.
- Noiville, C., (1999). Farm animal breeding and the law. In: A.M. Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven (Ed.), The future developments in farm animal breeding and reproduction and their ethical, legal and consumer implications (pp 91–100). Report EC-ELSA project 4th Framwork Programme for RTD Nov 1999.Google Scholar
- Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries and Costal Affairs (2009). Strategi for en miljømessig bærekraftig havbruksnæring. (Only available in Norwegian). www.regjeringen.no/…strategier…/strategi-for-en-miljomessig-barekraftig-.html. Accessed 10 July 2009.
- Olesen, I., Groen, A. F., & Gjerde, B. (2000). Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems. Journal of Animal Science, 78, 570–582.Google Scholar
- Olesen, I., Navrud, S., Kolstad, K. (2006). Economic values of animal welfare in breeding goals. Invited paper. Proceedings from the 8th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production. August 13–18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil CD-ROM: 538-1710.pdf.Google Scholar
- Olesen, I., Rosendal, G. K., Walløe Tvedt, M., Bryde, M, Bentsen, H. B. (2007). Access to and protection of aquaculture genetic resources—strategies and regulations. Aquaculture, 272S1, 47–61.Google Scholar
- Ouédraogo, A. (2003). Symbolic goods in the market place. Public perceptions of farm animal breeding and reproduction in France and the United Kingdom. In A. E. Liinamo, A. M. Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven (Eds). SEFABAR Sustainable European farm animal Breeding and reproduction. Final workshop, Rome, 4 sep 2003. pp. 36–46.Google Scholar
- Øverli, Ø., Winberg, S., Damsgård, B., & Jobling, M. (1998). Food intake and spontaneous swimming activity in Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus): Role of brain serotonergic activity and social interactions. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76, 1366–1370.Google Scholar
- Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology (2003). Future fish: issues in science and regulation of transgenic fish. Washington, Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/Food_and_Biotechnology/hhs_biotech_011403.pdf Accessed 5 July 2006.
- Randall, A. (1987). Resource economics. New York: John Wiley & Son.Google Scholar
- Rutten, M. J. M., Bovenhuis, H., Komen, H., Bijma, P. (2006). Mixed model methodology to infer whether aggression increases due to selection on growth in aquaculture species. Proceedings from the 8th World Congress on genetics applied to livestock production August 13–18, 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. CD-ROM: 432-2143.pdf.Google Scholar
- Rye, M. (2000). Bipatenter–mulige konsekvenser for genetisk foredlingsarbeid i akvakultur. In S. Rogne & O. J. Borge (Eds.), Biopatenter og EUs patentdirektiv. (only available in Norwegian). Rapport møte 29 September 2000 (pp. 26–27). Oslo: Bioteknologinemnda.Google Scholar
- Sandberg, K. I. (2009) International Health Policies. The Institutional Dimension of Global Child Immunization. PhD thesis. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
- Sohlberg, S., Mejdell, C., Ranheim, B., & Søli, N. E. (2004). Oppfatter fisk smerte, frykt og ubehag?: En litteraturgjennomgang. (only available in Norwegian). Norsk Veterinærtidsskrift, 116, 429–438.Google Scholar
- The Norwegian Government (2005). Plattform for regjeringssamarbeidet mellom Arbeiderpartiet, Sosialistisk Venstreparti og Senterpartiet 2005–09. 73 sider. (only available in Norwegian). http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/smk/dok/rapporter_planer/rapporter/2005/soria-moria-erklaringen.html.
- Thompson, P. B., & Nardone, A. (1999). Sustainable livestock production: Methodological and ethical challenges. Production Science, 61, 111–119.Google Scholar
- Torp Donner, H., & Juga, J. (1997). Sustainability-a challenge to animal breeding. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, 6, 229–239.Google Scholar
- Tvedt, Morten Walløe. (2005). Har noen eksklusive tinglige rettigheter til genetiske ressurser i Norge? (The Legal Situation Regarding Exclusive Rights to Genetic Resources in Norway). Retfærd, Nordisk juridisk tidsskrift, 109, 70–90. In Norwegian.Google Scholar
- Verspoor, E., Olesen, I., Bentsen, H. B., Glover, K., Mcginnity, P., Norris, A. (2007). Genetic effects of domestication, culture and breeding of fish and shellfish, and their impacts on wild populations. Atlantic salmon-Salmo salar. In T. Svåsand, D. Crosetti, E. García-Vázquez, E. Verspoor (Eds). Genetic impact of aquaculture activities on native populations. Genimpact final scientific report (EU contract RICA-CT-2005-022802). p. 23–31.Google Scholar
- WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Winberg, S., Nilsson, G. E., & Olsén, K. H. (1991). Social rank and brain levels of monoamines and monoamine metabolites in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L). Journal of Comparative Physiolology, A168, 241–246.Google Scholar