Intensive Livestock Farming: Global Trends, Increased Environmental Concerns, and Ethical Solutions

  • Ramona Cristina IleaEmail author


By 2050, global livestock production is expected to double—growing faster than any other agricultural sub-sector—with most of this increase taking place in the developing world. As the United Nation’s four-hundred-page report, Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, documents, livestock production is now one of three most significant contributors to environmental problems, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions, land degradation, water pollution, and increased health problems. The paper draws on the UN report as well as a flurry of other recently published studies in order to demonstrate the effect of intensive livestock production on global warming and on people’s health. The paper’s goal is to outline the problems caused by intensive livestock farming and analyze a number of possible solutions, including legislative changes and stricter regulations, community mobilizing, and consumers choosing to decrease their demand for animal products.


Agriculture Animals Environment Ethics Farming Livestock Meat 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



I appreciate the helpful feedback I received from several anonymous reviewers. I am also grateful to Gregory Oschwald, Jeff Breintenfeldt, and Michelle Bingaman.


  1. Aiken, W. (1984). Ethical issues in agriculture. In T. Regan (Ed.), Earthbound: New introductory essays in environmental ethics (pp. 274–288). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Alroe, H. F., Vaars, M., & Kristensen, E. S. (2001). Does organic farming face distinctive livestock welfare issues? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(3), 275–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Zahrani, K. H., Elsahfie, I. M., & Muneer, S. E. (2007). Factors affecting adoption of water conservation practices in the household sector in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from
  4. American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada. (2003). Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. June, Vol.␣103, Number 6, 748–765.Google Scholar
  5. American Public Health Association. (2003). Precautionary moratorium on new concentrated animal feed operations. Retrieved October 2008, from
  6. Barker, T., Bashmakov, I., Bernstein, L., Bogner, J. E., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., et al. (2007). Technical summary. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  7. Barrett, J. (2006). Hogging the air CAFO emissions reach into schools. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(.4), A241–A241.Google Scholar
  8. Bittman, M. (2008). Rethinking the meat-guzzler. The New York Times. Retrieved July 2008, from
  9. Bullard, R. (1994). Overcoming environmental racism in decisionmaking. Environment, 36, 10–20; 39–44.Google Scholar
  10. Callicott, B. (1980). Animal liberation: A triangular affair. Environmental Ethics, 2(4), 311–388.Google Scholar
  11. Casey, M. (2007). Millions face hunger from climate change. New York: The Associated Press, April 10.Google Scholar
  12. Chapagain, A. K., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2003). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international trade of livestock and livestock products. In A. Y. Hoekstra (Ed.), Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, C., & Regan, T. (2001). The animal rights debate. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Compassion in World Farming. (CIWF). (n.d.). What we do. Retrieved June 2008, from
  15. de Haan, C., Steinfeld, H., & Blackburn, H. (1997). Livestock and the environment: Finding a balance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, U.S. Agency for International Development and World Bank. Retrieved June 2008, from
  16. Diamond, C. (1978). Eating meat, eating people. Philosophy, 78(53), 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donham, K. J. (2000). The concentration of swine production: effects on swine health, productivity, human health, and the environment. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice, 16, 559–597.Google Scholar
  18. Eshel, G., & Martin, P. (2006). Diet, energy and global warming. Earth Interactions, 10, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher, B. S., Nakicenovic, N., Alfsen, K., Morlot, C. J., de la Chesnaye, F., & Hourcade, J.-Ch. (2007). Issues related to mitigation in the long term context. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2006a). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Retrieved June 2008, from
  21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2006b). Livestock a major threat to environment. Retrieved June 2008, from
  22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (n.d.). FAO Statistical Database. Retrieved January 2008, from
  23. Frey, R. G. (2004). Utilitarianism and moral vegetarianism again: Protest or effectiveness? In S. F. Sapontzis (Ed.), Food for thought: The debate over eating meat (pp. 118–123). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gardiner, S. (2007). Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114 (April), 555–600.Google Scholar
  25. Hursthouse, R. (2000). Ethics, humans and other animals: An introduction with readings. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2008). Climate change 2007—Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jamieson, D. (1998a). Animal liberation is an environmental ethic. Environmental Values, F98, 7(1), 41–57.Google Scholar
  28. Jamieson, D. (1998b). Global responsibilities: Ethics, public health and global environmental change. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5, 99–119.Google Scholar
  29. Jamieson, D. (2001). Climate change and global environmental justice. In P. Edwards & C. Miller (Eds.), Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and global environmental governance (pp. 287–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, K. K., & Sorenson, J. T. (1998). The idea of ethical accounting for a livestock farm. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 11(2), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaimowitz, D., Mertens, B., Wunder, S., & Pacheco, P. (2004). Hamburger connection fuels amazon destruction: Cattle ranching and deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon. Center for International Forestry Research. Retrieved July 2008, from
  32. Kaimowitz, D., & Smith, J. (2001). Soybean technology and the loss of natural vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia. In A. Angelsen & D. Kaimowitz (Eds.), Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation (pp. 195–211). Bangor, Indonesia: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Kilburn, K. H. (1999). Evaluating health effects from exposures to hydrogen sulfide: Central nervous system dysfunction. Environmental Epidemiology and Toxicology, 1, 207–216.Google Scholar
  34. Kirby, A. 2008. Hungry world ‹must eat less meat.’ BBC News. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from
  35. Klink, C. A., & Machado, R. B. (2005). Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 707–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Livestock, Environment, and Development Virtual Centre (LEAD). (2006). LEAD digital library: Livestock’s long shadow—environmental issues and options. Retrieved January 2008, from
  37. Messina, V. (1998). Position of the American dietetic association: vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 97(11), 1317–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mirabelli, M., Wing, S., Marshall, S., & Wilcosky, T. (2006a). Asthma symptoms among adolescents who attend public schools that are located near confined swine feeding operations. Pediatrics, 118, e66–e75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mirabelli, M., Wing, S., Marshall, S., & Wilcosky, T. (2006b). Race, poverty, and potential exposure of middle-school students to air emissions from confined swine feeding operations. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(4), 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nierenberg, D. (2006). Rethinking the global meat industry. In L. Starke (Ed.), State of the world 2006: A Worldwatch institute report on progress toward a sustainable society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  41. Nobis, N. (2002). Vegetarianism and virtue: Does consequentialism demand too little? Social theory and practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 28(1), 135–156.Google Scholar
  42. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production (PEW). (2008). Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America executive summary. Retrieved June 2008, from
  44. Pimentel, D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, E., et al. (2004). Water resources: Agricultural and environmental issues. BioScience, 54(10), 909–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pollan, M. (2007). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  46. Ogino, A., Orito, H., Shimada, K., & Hirooka, H. (2007). Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow–calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Animal Science Journal, 78(4), 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Resnik, D., & Roman, G. (2007). Health, justice and the environment. Bioethics, 21(4), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Revkin, A. (2007). Poor nations to bear brunt as world warms. The New York Times. Retrieved June 2008, from
  50. Ribaudo, M. (2003). Managing manure: New clean water act regulations create imperative for livestock producers. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Amber Waves, February. Retrieved January 2008, from
  51. Russell, J. B., & Rychlik, J. L. (2001). Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science, 292, 1119–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samson, K. (2008). Alert to neurologists—help needed to help solve mysterious neurological illness at Minnesota Pork Plant. Neurology Today, 7, 3–4. February.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  54. Singer, P. (2002). One world: the ethics of globalization. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, R. A. (1998). Impact of disease on feedlot performance: A review. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 272–274.Google Scholar
  56. Thompson, P. (2001). Animal welfare and livestock production in a postindustrial Milieu. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 4(3), 20–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thompson, P., & Nardone, A. (1999). Sustainable livestock production: Methodological and ethical challenges. Livestock Production Science, 61(2–3), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thorne, P. S., Donham, K. J., Dosman, J., Jagielo, P., Merchant, J. A., & von Essen, S. (1995). Occupational health. In K. Donham & K. Thu (Eds.), Proceedings, Understanding the Impacts of Large-Scale Swine Production, June 29–30. Des Moines, IA. Retrieved November 2008, from <>.
  59. Thu, K., Donham, K., Ziegenhorn, R., Reynolds, S., Thorne, P. S., Subramanian, P., et al. (1997). A control study of the physical and mental health of residents living near a large-scale swine operation. Journal Agricultural Safety Health, 3(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  60. Tudge, Colin. (2003). So shall we reap. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  61. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (USDA). (n.d.). Feed Grains Database: Yearbook Tables. Retrieved January 2008, from
  62. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (1998). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–1996 (p. 5). Retrieved January 2008, from
  63. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2007). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2005 (pp. 6–7). Retrieved January 2008, from
  64. Van Hollen, C. (2008). Climate MATTERS Cap-and-Trade Legislation Introduced. Congressman Chris Van Hollen: Press Release. Retrieved June 2008, from
  65. Varner, G. (1994). What’s wrong with animal byproducts? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 7, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vergé, X. P. C., De Kimpe, C., & Desjardins, R. L. (2007). Agricultural Production, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Potential. Retrieved June 2008, from
  67. Wenz, P. (1984). An ecological argument for vegetarianism. Ethics and Animals, 5, 2–9.Google Scholar
  68. Wing, S., & Wolf, S. (2000). Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108(3), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woolf, A. (Dir.). (2008). The King of Corn. Docurama Films, 2008.Google Scholar
  70. World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (WHO/FAO). (2002). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Draft report of the joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Retrieved June 2008, from
  71. World Water Week (WWW). (2006a). Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from
  72. World Water Week (WWW). (2006b). 2006 Synthesis. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from
  73. World Water Week (WWW). (2007). Progress and Prospects on Water. Retrieved January 18, 2008, from
  74. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (n.d. a). Facts about Soy Production and the Basel Criteria. Retrieved January 2008, from
  75. World Wildlife Fund. (n.d. b) Brazilian Savannas. Retrieved January 2008, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentPacific UniversityForest GroveUSA

Personalised recommendations