Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea: The Importance of Food Safety and Ethics in a Globalizing Market

Article

Abstract

As the issue of food safety became one of the important public agenda, consumer concern for food safety became the general public concern. The Korea U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) completion allowing import of U.S. beef to Korea has turned into a massive public uproar and a series of demonstrations, revealing widespread concerns on the part of Korean producers and consumers about government food safety regulations and mishandling of the beef trade requirement. The mishandling of public concerns for BSE on U.S. beef import by the administrators led to a breakdown of the relationship between the public and the government and a loss of consumer confidence in Korea’s food safety system. The KORUS FTA beef crisis raised the issues of government accountability and the importance of understanding moral and ethical aspects of food safety management that pose perceived risk for BSE by the Korean citizen. The aim of this paper is to address the importance of understanding consumer concerns, food ethics and of appropriate risk communication in dealing with politically and publically sensitive food safety issues. This is achieved by assessing the factors that contributed to the conflict between the Korean government and the Korean public over the KORUS FTA beef agreement.

Keywords

Food safety Risk management KORUS FTA Consumer trust BSE concerns 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archibald, S. O. (1988). Introduction in regulating chemicals: A public policy quandary, agricultural issues center. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  2. Beekman, V. (2008). Consumer rights to informed choice on the food market. Ethical Thoery and Moral Practice, 11, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brom, F. W. A. (2000). Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burstein, P. (1991). Policy domain: Organization, culture, and policy outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences (pp. 41–42). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Chosun. (2008). Masquerade of cows and helpless consumers. Chosun Economy Newspaper B1, 18 June 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Coff, C., Korthals, M., & Barling, D. (2007). Ethical traceability and informed food choice. In C. Coff, D. Barling, M. Korthals, & T. Nielsen (Eds.), Ethical traceability and communicating food. Dordrecht: Springer (Autumn 2007).Google Scholar
  8. Council for Rural Areas. (1998). Care and trust: The basis for food production in the twenty-first century. An abridged edition of a comprehensive advice in Dutch. The Hague: RLG.Google Scholar
  9. De Jonge, J., Frewer, L., Van Trijp, H., Renes, R. J., De Wit, W., & Timmers, J. (2004). Monitoring consumer confidence in food safety: An exploratory study. British Food Journal, 106(10/11), 837–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DVFP and GEA (1999). Department of Veterinary and Food Policy and General Environmental Affairs of the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Consumentenzorgen en Handel in Agararische Pproducten. Discussienota (Discussion-paper on Consumer Concerns and Agricultural Trade). The Hague: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries.Google Scholar
  11. Frewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & Sparks, P. (1994). The interrelationship between perceived knowledge, control and risk associated with a range of food related hazards targeted at the self, other people and society. Journal of Food Safety, 14, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GAIN (2008). Semi-annual report on Korean Livestock market. GAIN Report KS7062, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), p. 4.Google Scholar
  13. Gino, C. M., Igrashi, M., & Tamashiro, H. (2005). Beef safety standards: An evaluation of public health policies of Japan, Europe, and USA. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 10, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes, D. (1995). Animal welfare: The consumer and the food industry. British Food Journal, 97(10), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, K. K., & Sandoe, P. (2002). Food safety and ethics: The interplay between science and values. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston, D. J. (1999). Editorial: A defense of modern biotechnology. OECD Observer, No. 216 (p. 3). (March, 1999).Google Scholar
  17. Kafka, C., & von Alvensleben, R. (1998). Consumer perception of food-related hazards and the problem of risk communication. In AIR-CAT Series, 4(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, D. (1988). Humans in the chemical decision chain. In H. O. Cater & C. F. Nuckton (Eds.), Chemicals in the human food chain: Sources, options and public policy. University of California, Davis, CA: Agricultural Issues Center.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, R. B. (2008). Transformation of an emerging economy to a knowledge-based economy: Korean case. Global Business Review, 9.1, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kramer, C. (1990). Food safety: The consumer side of the environmental issue. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22, 33–40.Google Scholar
  21. Krugman, P. (2008). Bad cow disease, Op-Ed Columnist, NewYork Times, 13 June 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Latouche, K., Rainelli, P., & Vermersch, D. (1998). Attitudes toward food safety and the environment: A comparison of consumers in Japan and the US. Rural Sociology, 63, 394–411.Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd, T., McCorriston, S., Morgan, C. W., & Rayner, A. J. (2001). The impact of food scares on price adjustment in the UK beef market. Agricultural Economics, 25, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loader, R., & Hobbs, J. (1996). The hidden costs and benefits of BSE. British Food Journal, 98(11), 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mangen, M. J., & Burrell, A. M. (2001). Decomposing preference shifts for meat and fish in the Netherlands. J Agric Econ, 52, 16–28.Google Scholar
  26. Matthee, M., & Vermersch, D. (1999). Are the precautionary principle and the international trade of genetically modified organisms reconcilable. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McClusky, J. J., Grimsrud, K. M., Ouchi, H., & Wahl, T. I. (2005). Bovine spongiform encephalopathy in Japan: Consumers food safety perceptions and willingness to pay for tested beef. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 49, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meijboom, F. L. B., Visak, T., & Brom, F. W. A. (2006). From trust to trustworthiness: Why information is not enough in the food sector. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Micklitz, H.-W. (2000). International regulation on health, safety, and the environment—trends and challenges. J Consum Policy, 23, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., Ritson, C., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Public worry about specific food safety issues. British Food Journal, 106(1), 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer, C. M. (1996). A week that shook the meat industry: The effects on the UK beef industry of the BSE crisis. British Food Journal, 98(11), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rippe, K. P. (1999). Novel foods and consumer rights. Concerning food policy in a liberal state. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts, T., Smallwood, D. (1991). Data needs to address economic issues in food safety. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73(3), 933–942.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, D., & Riethmuller, P. (2000). Consumer concerns about food safety in Australia and Japan. British Food Journal, 102(11), 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public perceptions of food-related hazards: Individual and social dimensions. Food Quality and Preferences, 5, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thonney, P. F., & Bisogni, C. A. (1991). Food safety policy: A shared responsibility. Human Ecology Forum, 19, 13–15.Google Scholar
  37. Verbeke, W. A. J., & Viaene, J. (2000). Ethical challenges for livestock production: Meeting consumer concerns about meat safety and animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verbeke, W., & Ward, R. W. (2001). A fresh meat almost ideal demand system incorporating negative TV press and advertising impact. Agricultural Economics, 25, 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vos, E. (2000). EU food safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Worosz, M. R., Knight, A. J., & Harris, C. K. (2008). Resilience in the US red meat industry: The role of food safety policy. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yeung, R. M. W., & Morris, J. (2006). An empirical study of the impact of consumer perceived risk on purchase likelihood: A modelling approach. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(3), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessHanYang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations