Meeting Consumer Concerns for Food Safety in South Korea: The Importance of Food Safety and Ethics in a Globalizing Market
- 504 Downloads
As the issue of food safety became one of the important public agenda, consumer concern for food safety became the general public concern. The Korea U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) completion allowing import of U.S. beef to Korea has turned into a massive public uproar and a series of demonstrations, revealing widespread concerns on the part of Korean producers and consumers about government food safety regulations and mishandling of the beef trade requirement. The mishandling of public concerns for BSE on U.S. beef import by the administrators led to a breakdown of the relationship between the public and the government and a loss of consumer confidence in Korea’s food safety system. The KORUS FTA beef crisis raised the issues of government accountability and the importance of understanding moral and ethical aspects of food safety management that pose perceived risk for BSE by the Korean citizen. The aim of this paper is to address the importance of understanding consumer concerns, food ethics and of appropriate risk communication in dealing with politically and publically sensitive food safety issues. This is achieved by assessing the factors that contributed to the conflict between the Korean government and the Korean public over the KORUS FTA beef agreement.
KeywordsFood safety Risk management KORUS FTA Consumer trust BSE concerns
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The author wishes to thank the three anonymous reviewers who provided valuable suggestions for improving an earlier version of this paper. The research reported is funded by Hanyang University, and the author would like to thank Hanyang University for supporting her research project.
- Archibald, S. O. (1988). Introduction in regulating chemicals: A public policy quandary, agricultural issues center. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences (pp. 41–42). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chosun. (2008). Masquerade of cows and helpless consumers. Chosun Economy Newspaper B1, 18 June 2008.Google Scholar
- Coff, C., Korthals, M., & Barling, D. (2007). Ethical traceability and informed food choice. In C. Coff, D. Barling, M. Korthals, & T. Nielsen (Eds.), Ethical traceability and communicating food. Dordrecht: Springer (Autumn 2007).Google Scholar
- Council for Rural Areas. (1998). Care and trust: The basis for food production in the twenty-first century. An abridged edition of a comprehensive advice in Dutch. The Hague: RLG.Google Scholar
- DVFP and GEA (1999). Department of Veterinary and Food Policy and General Environmental Affairs of the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, Consumentenzorgen en Handel in Agararische Pproducten. Discussienota (Discussion-paper on Consumer Concerns and Agricultural Trade). The Hague: Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries.Google Scholar
- GAIN (2008). Semi-annual report on Korean Livestock market. GAIN Report KS7062, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), p. 4.Google Scholar
- Johnston, D. J. (1999). Editorial: A defense of modern biotechnology. OECD Observer, No. 216 (p. 3). (March, 1999).Google Scholar
- Kafka, C., & von Alvensleben, R. (1998). Consumer perception of food-related hazards and the problem of risk communication. In AIR-CAT Series, 4(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, D. (1988). Humans in the chemical decision chain. In H. O. Cater & C. F. Nuckton (Eds.), Chemicals in the human food chain: Sources, options and public policy. University of California, Davis, CA: Agricultural Issues Center.Google Scholar
- Kramer, C. (1990). Food safety: The consumer side of the environmental issue. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22, 33–40.Google Scholar
- Krugman, P. (2008). Bad cow disease, Op-Ed Columnist, NewYork Times, 13 June 2008.Google Scholar
- Latouche, K., Rainelli, P., & Vermersch, D. (1998). Attitudes toward food safety and the environment: A comparison of consumers in Japan and the US. Rural Sociology, 63, 394–411.Google Scholar
- Mangen, M. J., & Burrell, A. M. (2001). Decomposing preference shifts for meat and fish in the Netherlands. J Agric Econ, 52, 16–28.Google Scholar
- Roberts, T., Smallwood, D. (1991). Data needs to address economic issues in food safety. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73(3), 933–942.Google Scholar
- Thonney, P. F., & Bisogni, C. A. (1991). Food safety policy: A shared responsibility. Human Ecology Forum, 19, 13–15.Google Scholar