Constrained Choice and Ethical Dilemmas in Land Management: Environmental Quality and Food Safety in California Agriculture

Article

Abstract

As environmental and conservation efforts increasingly turn towards agricultural landscapes, it is important to understand how land management decisions are made by agricultural producers. While previous studies have explored producer decision-making, many fail to recognize the importance of external structural influences. This paper uses a case study to explore how consolidated markets and increasing corporate power in the food system can constrain producer choice and create ethical dilemmas over land management. Crop growers in the Central Coast region of California face conflicting demands regarding environmental quality and industry imposed food safety standards. A mail survey and personal interviews were used to explore growers’ perceptions and actions regarding these demands. Results indicate that in many cases growers face serious ethical dilemmas and feel pressured by large processing and retail firms to adopt measures they find environmentally destructive and unethical. Future strategies to address environmental issues on agricultural landscapes should consider the economic constraints producers face and the role of large firms in creating production standards.

Keywords

Constrained behavior Environmental quality Ethical dilemmas Food safety Land management Producer decision-making 

References

  1. Battershill, M. R. J., & Gilg, A. W. (1997). Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England. Journal of Rural Studies, 13(2), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beretti, M., & Stuart, D. (2008). Food safety and environmental quality impose conflicting demands on Central Coast growers. California Agriculture, 62(2), 68–73.Google Scholar
  3. Brodt, S., Klonsky, K., Tourte, L., Duncan, R., Hendricks, L., Ohmart, C., et al. (2004). Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 19(4), 237--247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, R. L., & Goodman, M. K. (2004). Consuming narratives: The political ecology of ‹alternative’ consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(3), 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busch, L. (2003). Virgil, vigilance, and voice: Agrifood ethics in an age of globalization. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busch, L., & Bain, C. (2004). New! Improved? The transformation of the global agrifood system. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caffrey, J., Browne, M., & Typler, T. W. B. (2001). Changes in a California Estuary: A profile of Elkhorn Slough. Moss Landing: Elkhorn Slough Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Cary, J. W., & Wilkinson, R. L. (1997). Perceived profitability and farmers’ conservation behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48(1), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CDC. (2006). Center for Disease Control. Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157 infections, November–December 2006. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/december/121406.htm.
  10. CDHS/FDA. (2007). California Department of Health Services and US Food and Drug Administration. Investigation of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak associated with dole pre-packaged spinach. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/fdb/HTML/Food/EnvInvRpt.htm.
  11. Fitzsimmons, M. (1986). The new industrial agriculture—the regional integration of specialty crop production. Economic Geography, 62(4), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2000). Leibig, Marx, and the depletion of soil fertility: Relevance for today’s agriculture. In F. Magdoff, J. B. Foster, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment (pp. 43–60). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goodman, M. K. (2004). Reading fair trade: Political ecological imaginary and the moral economy of fair trade foods. Political Geography, 23(7), 891–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorny, J. R., Giclas, H., Gombas, D., & Means, K. (2006). Commodity specific food safety guidelines for the lettuce and leafy greens supply chain. Retrieved on April 25, 2006, from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/lettsup.pdf.
  15. Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3), 354–369.Google Scholar
  16. Hatanaka, M., & Busch, L. (2008). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendrickson, M., & James, H. S. (2005). The ethics of constrained choice: How the industrialization of agriculture impacts farming and farmer behavior. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 18(3), 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrickson, M. K., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinrichs, C. C., & Welsh, R. (2003). The effects of the industrialization of US livestock agriculture on promoting sustainable production practices. Agriculture and Human Values, 20(2), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, J. W., Anderson, B. S., Phillips, B. M., Tjeerdema, R. S., Puckett, H. M., & de Vlaming, V. (1999). Patterns of aquatic toxicity in an agriculturally dominated coastal watershed in California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 75(1–2), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, H. S. (2003). On finding solutions to ethical problems in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. James, H. S., & Hendrickson, M. K. (2008). Perceived economic pressures and farmer ethics. Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, A. (2008). Personal Communication. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. San Luis Obispo, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Knight, M. A. (1997). A political culture of conservation: Citizen action and marine conservation in the Monterey Bay. Dissertation, Santa Cruz: University of California.Google Scholar
  25. Korthals, M. (2001). Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. LGMA. (2008). Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. Retrieved on June 2, 2008, from http://caleafygreens.ca.gov/members/resources.asp.
  27. Los Huertos, M. (1999). Nitrogen dynamics in vegetative buffer strips receiving nitrogen runoff in Elkhorn Slough Watershed, California. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  28. Lovell, S. T., & Sullivan, W. C. (2006). Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: Evidence, promise, and open questions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 112(4), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lubowski, R., Vesterby, M., Bucholtz, S., Baez, A., & Roberts, M. (2002). Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002- EIB 14. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved on April 2, 2008, from www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EIB14/.
  31. McCann, E., Sullivan, S., Erickson, D., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: A comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environmental Management, 21(5), 747–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenence in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Napier, T. L., Thraen, C. S., & McClaskie, S. L. (1988). Adoption of soil conservation practices by farmers in erosion-prone areas of Ohio- the application of logit modeling. Society & Natural Resources, 1(2), 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash, L. (1990). Good intentions aside: A managers guide to resolving ethical problems. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  35. NOAA. (1999). Action plan: Agriculture and rural lands, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Monterey, CA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Water Quality Protection Program for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA.Google Scholar
  36. Primus Labs. (2008). Ranch Self Audit v. 7.04. Retrieved on July 8, 2008, from http://www.primuslabs.com/psr/fieldfacility.aspx?_Type=1&_MenuID=1.
  37. Roff, R. J. (2007). Shopping for change? Neoliberalizing activism and the limits to eating non-GMO. Agriculture and Human Values, 24(4), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sexton, R. J. (2000). Industrialization and consolidation in the US food sector: Implications for competition and welfare. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(5), 1087–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. State of California. (1997). Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Stuart, D. (2008). The illusion of control: Industrialized agriculture, nature, and food safety. Agriculture & Human Values, 25(2), 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stuart, D., Shennan, C., & Brown, M. (2006). Food Safety and Environmental Protection on the Central Coast: Exploring the Science behind an Apparent Conflict. The Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California Santa Cruz Research Brief #10. Retrieved on July 25, 2008, from http://casfs.ucsc.edu/publications/briefs/index.html.
  42. Traore, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (1998). On-farm adoption of conservation practices: The role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and health hazards. Land Economics, 74(1), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. United States Census of Agriculture. (2002). State and County Statistics. Retrieved on January 20, 2007, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp.
  44. Upadhyay, B. M., Young, D. L., Wang, H. H., & Wandschneider, P. (2003). How do farmers who adopt multiple conservation practices differ from their neighbors? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urban, M. A. (2005). Values and ethical beliefs regarding agricultural drainage in central Illinois, USA. Society & Natural Resources, 18(2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilkins, J. L. (2005). Eating right here: Moving from consumer to food citizen. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(3), 269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worrell, R., & Appleby, M. C. (2000). Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wrigley, N. (1999). Market rules and spatial outcomes: Insights from the corporate restructuring of US food retailing. Geographical Analysis, 31(3), 288–309.Google Scholar
  49. Wrigley, N. (2002). Transforming the corporate landscape of US food retailing: Market power, financial re-engineering and regulation. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 93(1), 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Studies DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations