Constrained Choice and Ethical Dilemmas in Land Management: Environmental Quality and Food Safety in California Agriculture
- First Online:
- 320 Downloads
As environmental and conservation efforts increasingly turn towards agricultural landscapes, it is important to understand how land management decisions are made by agricultural producers. While previous studies have explored producer decision-making, many fail to recognize the importance of external structural influences. This paper uses a case study to explore how consolidated markets and increasing corporate power in the food system can constrain producer choice and create ethical dilemmas over land management. Crop growers in the Central Coast region of California face conflicting demands regarding environmental quality and industry imposed food safety standards. A mail survey and personal interviews were used to explore growers’ perceptions and actions regarding these demands. Results indicate that in many cases growers face serious ethical dilemmas and feel pressured by large processing and retail firms to adopt measures they find environmentally destructive and unethical. Future strategies to address environmental issues on agricultural landscapes should consider the economic constraints producers face and the role of large firms in creating production standards.
KeywordsConstrained behavior Environmental quality Ethical dilemmas Food safety Land management Producer decision-making
- Beretti, M., & Stuart, D. (2008). Food safety and environmental quality impose conflicting demands on Central Coast growers. California Agriculture, 62(2), 68–73.Google Scholar
- Caffrey, J., Browne, M., & Typler, T. W. B. (2001). Changes in a California Estuary: A profile of Elkhorn Slough. Moss Landing: Elkhorn Slough Foundation.Google Scholar
- CDC. (2006). Center for Disease Control. Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157 infections, November–December 2006. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/december/121406.htm.
- CDHS/FDA. (2007). California Department of Health Services and US Food and Drug Administration. Investigation of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak associated with dole pre-packaged spinach. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/fdb/HTML/Food/EnvInvRpt.htm.
- Foster, J. B., & Magdoff, F. (2000). Leibig, Marx, and the depletion of soil fertility: Relevance for today’s agriculture. In F. Magdoff, J. B. Foster, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment (pp. 43–60). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
- Gorny, J. R., Giclas, H., Gombas, D., & Means, K. (2006). Commodity specific food safety guidelines for the lettuce and leafy greens supply chain. Retrieved on April 25, 2006, from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/lettsup.pdf.
- Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., & Busch, L. (2005). Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy, 30(3), 354–369.Google Scholar
- Jones, A. (2008). Personal Communication. Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. San Luis Obispo, CA.Google Scholar
- Knight, M. A. (1997). A political culture of conservation: Citizen action and marine conservation in the Monterey Bay. Dissertation, Santa Cruz: University of California.Google Scholar
- LGMA. (2008). Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement. Retrieved on June 2, 2008, from http://caleafygreens.ca.gov/members/resources.asp.
- Los Huertos, M. (1999). Nitrogen dynamics in vegetative buffer strips receiving nitrogen runoff in Elkhorn Slough Watershed, California. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
- Lubowski, R., Vesterby, M., Bucholtz, S., Baez, A., & Roberts, M. (2002). Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002- EIB 14. Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved on April 2, 2008, from www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/EIB14/.
- Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenence in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Nash, L. (1990). Good intentions aside: A managers guide to resolving ethical problems. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- NOAA. (1999). Action plan: Agriculture and rural lands, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary. Monterey, CA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Water Quality Protection Program for Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA.Google Scholar
- Primus Labs. (2008). Ranch Self Audit v. 7.04. Retrieved on July 8, 2008, from http://www.primuslabs.com/psr/fieldfacility.aspx?_Type=1&_MenuID=1.
- State of California. (1997). Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
- Stuart, D., Shennan, C., & Brown, M. (2006). Food Safety and Environmental Protection on the Central Coast: Exploring the Science behind an Apparent Conflict. The Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California Santa Cruz Research Brief #10. Retrieved on July 25, 2008, from http://casfs.ucsc.edu/publications/briefs/index.html.
- United States Census of Agriculture. (2002). State and County Statistics. Retrieved on January 20, 2007, from http://www.nass.usda.gov/Census_of_Agriculture/index.asp.
- Wrigley, N. (1999). Market rules and spatial outcomes: Insights from the corporate restructuring of US food retailing. Geographical Analysis, 31(3), 288–309.Google Scholar