Advertisement

An Exploration of the Value of Naturalness and Wild Nature

  • Ben Ridder
Article

Abstract

The source of the value of naturalness is of considerable relevance for the conservation movement, to philosophers, and to society generally. However, naturalness is a complex quality and resists straightforward definition. Here, two interpretations of what is “natural” are explored. One of these assesses the naturalness of species and ecosystems with reference to a benchmark date, such as the advent of industrialization. The value of naturalness in this case largely reflects prioritization of the value of biodiversity. However, the foundation of our understanding of naturalness is that it describes processes that are free of human intervention. Conflict between the two interpretations of naturalness is apparent in the claim that naturalness can be enhanced by human intervention, in the form of ecological restoration. Although naturalness in its purest form precludes human intervention, some human activities are also apparently more natural than others. This continuum of naturalness relates to the autonomy of the individual from abstract instrumentalism, which describes a particular form of influence ubiquitous in contemporary society. The value of naturalness reflects both dissatisfaction with these threats to personal autonomy, and respect for wild nature as the embodiment of a larger-than-human realm.

Keywords

abstract instrumentalism autonomy naturalness rational agency values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angermeier P. L. (2000) The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation. Conservation Biology 14:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry D., Oelschlaeger M. (1996) A Science for Survival: Values and onservation Biology. onservation Biology 10:905–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan A. (1988) Thinking about Nature: An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Budiansky S. (1995) Nature’s Keepers: The New Science of Nature Management. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess J. A., Walsh A. J. (1998) Is Genetic Engineering Wrong, Per Se?. The Journal of Value Inquiry 32:393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carruthers P. (1992) The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Cérézuelle D. (2004) Nature and Freedom: An Introduction to the Environmental Thought of Bernard Charbonneau. In: Foltz B. V., Frodeman R. (eds.) Rethinking Nature: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, pp. 314–329Google Scholar
  8. Clark J. (2002) Bernard Charbonneau: Regionalism and the Politics of Experience. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 13:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole D. N. (2005) Symbolic Values: The Overlooked Values that Make Wilderness Unique. International Journal of Wilderness 11:23–27Google Scholar
  10. Czech B. (2004) A Chronological Frame of Reference for Ecological Integrity and Natural Conditions. Natural Resources Journal 44:1113–1136Google Scholar
  11. Davis M. (2002) Dead Cities and Other Tales. New York, The New PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Drew W. (1986) Killing Wilderness. The Trumpeter 3:19–23Google Scholar
  13. Elliot R. (1997) Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis R. J. (1998) The Dark Side of the Left: Illiberal Egalitarianism in America. Lawrence, University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox N. (2002) Against the Machine: The Hidden Luddite Tradition in Literature, Art, and Individual Lives. Washington, DC, Island PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Fox W. (1995) Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism. Foxhole, ResurgenceGoogle Scholar
  17. Glover J. M. (2000) Soul of the Wilderness: Can We Stop Trying to Control Nature? International Journal of Wilderness 6:4–8Google Scholar
  18. Goodin R. E. (1992) Green Political Theory. Cambridge, Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Haila Y. (1997) A ‚Natural’ Benchmark For Ecosystem Function. Conservation Biology 11:300–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargrove E. C. (1989) Foundations of Environmental Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  21. Heyd T. (2005) Introduction. In: Heyd T. (ed.) Recognizing the Autonomy of Nature: Theory and Practice. New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 1–22Google Scholar
  22. Higgs E. (2003) Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological. Restoration Cambridge, The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Hull R. B., Richert D., Seekamp E., Robertson D., Buhyoff G. J. (2003) Understandings of Environmental Quality: Ambiguities and Values Held by Environmental Professionals. Environmental Management 31:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jordan W. R. (1994) ‚Sunflower Forest’: Ecological Restoration as the Basis for a New Environmental Paradigm. In: Baldwin A. D., de Luce J., Pletsch C. (eds.) Beyond Preservation: Restoring and Inventing Landscapes. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 17–34Google Scholar
  25. Jordan W. R. (2005) Autonomy, Restoration, and the Law of Nature, In: Heyd T. (ed.) Recognizing the Autonomy of Nature: Theory and Practice. New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 189–205Google Scholar
  26. Katz E. (1997) Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and the Natural Community. Lanham, Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirkman R. (2002) Skeptical Environmentalism: The Limits of Philosophy and Science. Bloomington, Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis C. S. (1967) Studies in Words, 2nd edn Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindley R. (1986) Autonomy. Houndmills, Macmillan EducationGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathews F. (2005) Reinhabiting Reality: Towards a Recovery of Culture. Sydney, University of New South Wales PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Mill J. S. (1969) Three Essays on Religion: Nature, The Utility of Religion, and Theism. Westmead, Gregg International PublishersGoogle Scholar
  32. Norton, B. G. (1986), “Sand Dollar Psychology.” The Washington Post Magazine, June 1, pp 11–14.Google Scholar
  33. Norton B. G. (1991) Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterken G. F. (1996) Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Povilitis T. (2002) What is a Natural Area?. Natural Areas Journal 22:70–74Google Scholar
  36. Price J. (1995) Looking for Nature at the Mall: A Field Guide to the Nature Company. In: Cronon W. (ed.) Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature. New York, Norton W. W., pp. 186–203Google Scholar
  37. Reed P. (1989) Man Apart: An Alternative to the Self-Realization Approach. Environmental Ethics 11:53–69Google Scholar
  38. Ridder, B. (2005), “Reorienting Environmentalism to Nature-Inspired-Autonomy.” Griffith Journal of the Environment 1 http://www.gu.edu.au/faculty/ens/gje. Accessed July 1, 2006.
  39. Ridder, B. (2007), “The Naturalness versus Wildness Debate: Ambiguity, Inconsistency, and Unattainable Objectivity.” Restoration Ecology 15, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Roebuck P., Phifer P. (1999) The Persistence of Positivism in Conservation Biology. Conservation Biology 13:444–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rolston H. (1991) The Wilderness Idea Reaffirmed. Environmental Professional 13:370–377Google Scholar
  42. Rolston H. (1994) Conserving Natural Value. New York, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Rolston H. (2001) Natural and Unnatural: Wild and Cultural. Western North American Naturalist 61:267–276Google Scholar
  44. Rozin P., Spranca M., Krieger Z., Neuhaus R., Surillo D., Swerdlin A., Wood K. (2004) Natural Preference: Instrumental and Ideational/ Moral Motivation, and the Contrast Between Foods and Medicines. Appetite 43:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sagoff M. (1997) Muddle or Muddle Through? Takings Jurisprudence Meets the Endangered Species Act. William and Mary Law Review 38:825–993Google Scholar
  46. Sagoff M. (2000) Ecosystem Design in Historical and Philosophical Context. In: Pimentel D., Westra L., Noss R. F. (eds.) Ecological Integrity: Integrating Environment, Conservation, and Health. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 61–78Google Scholar
  47. Sessions G. (1992) Ecocentrism, Wilderness, and Global Protection. In: Oelschlaeger M. (ed.) The Wilderness Condition: Essays on Environment and Civilization. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 90–130Google Scholar
  48. Siipi H. (2004) Naturalness in Biological Conservation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:457–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simonsen K. H. (1981) The Value of Wildness. Environmental Ethics 3:259–263Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, J. A. and E. S. C. Weiner (eds.) (1989), Oxford English Dictionary, Volume 10, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Soper K. (1995) What is Nature? Culture, Politics and the Non-Human. Oxford, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  52. Soulé M. E. (1985) What is conservation biology?. Bioscience 35:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephens P. H. G. (2000) Nature, Purity, Ontology. Environmental Values 9:267–294Google Scholar
  54. Stephens P. H. G. (2004) Nature and Human Liberty. Organization & Environment 17:76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stockwell C. A., Hendry A. P., Kinnison M. T. (2003) Contemporary Evolution Meets Conservation Biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Takacs D. (1996) The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor B. (1999) Green Apocalypticism: Understanding Disaster in the Radical Environmental Worldview. Society & Natural Resources 12:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Turner J. (1996) The Abstract Wild. Tucson, The University of Arizona PressGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner J. (2001) The Wild and its New Enemies. In: Kerasote T. (ed.) Return of the Wild: The Future of Our National Lands. Washington, DC, Island Press, pp. 119–35Google Scholar
  60. Tybirk K., Alrøe H. F., Frederiksen P. (2004) Nature Quality in Organic Farming: A Conceptual Analysis of Considerations and Criteria in a European Context. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:249–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Verhoog H., Matze M., Van Beuren E. L., Baars T. (2003) The Role of the Concept of the Natural (Naturalness) in Organic Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wallington T. J., Moore S. A. (2005) Ecology, Values, and Objectivity: Advancing the Debate. BioScience 55:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Weston A. (1992) Toward Better Problems: New Perspectives on Abortion, Animal Rights, the Environment, and Justice. Philadelphia, Temple University PressGoogle Scholar
  64. Woodward C. (2002) In Ruins. London, VintageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Geography and Environmental StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations