Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap

  • Iris VermeirEmail author
  • Wim Verbeke


Although public interest in sustainability increases and consumer attitudes are mainly positive, behavioral patterns are not univocally consistent with attitudes. This study investigates the presumed gap between favorable attitude towards sustainable behavior and behavioral intention to purchase sustainable food products. The impact of involvement, perceived availability, certainty, perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE), values, and social norms on consumers’ attitudes and intentions towards sustainable food products is analyzed. The empirical research builds on a survey with a sample of 456 young consumers, using a questionnaire and an experimental design with manipulation of key constructs through showing advertisements for sustainable dairy. Involvement with sustainability, certainty, and PCE have a significant positive impact on attitude towards buying sustainable dairy products, which in turn correlates strongly with intention to buy. Low perceived availability of sustainable products explains why intentions to buy remain low, although attitudes might be positive. On the reverse side, experiencing social pressure from peers (social norm) explains intentions to buy, despite rather negative personal attitudes. This study shows that more sustainable and ethical food consumption can be stimulated through raising involvement, PCE, certainty, social norms, and perceived availability.


attitude behavior consumer food sustainable consumption 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I. 2001“Nature and Operation of Attitudes”Annual Review of Psychology522758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. 1974“Factors Influencing Intentions and Intention-Behavior Relation”Human Relations27115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beharrel, B., Denisson, T. J. 1995“Involvement in a Routine Food Shopping Context”British Food Journal1072429Google Scholar
  4. Berger, I. E., Corbin, R. M. 1992“Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Faith in Others as Moderators of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing117988Google Scholar
  5. Bisonette, M. M., Contento, I. R. 2001“Adolescents’ Perspectives and Food Choice Behaviors in Terms of the Environmental Impacts of Food Production Practices: Application of a Psychosocial Model”Journal of Nutrition Education337282Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, S. M. 1992“Personal Values and Consumer Research: A Historical Perspective”Research in Marketing113579Google Scholar
  7. Carrigan, M., Attalla, A. 2001“The Myth of the Ethical Consumer- Do Ethics Matter in Purchase Behavior”Journal of Consumer Marketing18560577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cera-Foundation (2001), Biologische land- en tuinbouw: de Stille doorbraak Voorbij!? Leuven: HorizonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, R. Y. K. 2001“Determinants of Chinese Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior”Psychology and Marketing18389413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., Rayp, G. 2003Are fair trade labels good business? Ethics and coffee buying intentionsWorking Paper Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGhentGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamantapoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., Bohlen, G. M. 2003“Can Socio-Demographics Still Play a Role in Profiling Green Consumers? A Review of the Evidence and an Empirical Investigation”Journal of Business Research56465480Google Scholar
  12. Dickson, M. A. 2001“Utility of No Sweat Labels for Apparel Consumers: Profiling Label Users and Predicting their Purchases”The Journal of Consumer Affairs3596119Google Scholar
  13. Dupuis, E. 2000“Not In My Body: rBGH and the Rise of Organic Milk”Agriculture and Human Values17285295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellen, P. S., Weiner, J. L., Cobb-Walgreen, C. 1991“The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing10102117Google Scholar
  15. Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W. 1995Consumer behaviorThe Dryden PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsyth, D. R. 1981“Moral Judgment: The Influence of Ethical Ideology”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin7218223Google Scholar
  17. FSA (Food Standards Agency), Qualitative research to explore public attitudes to food safety, Report prepared for the FSA by Cragg Ross Dawson Ltd. [online] [cited 13.06.2003] URL: pdf, 2000
  18. Ger, G. 1999“Experiental Meanings of Consumption and Sustainability in Turkey”Advances in Consumer Research26276280Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, A. 1991Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern AgeStanford University PressPalo AltoGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodwin, N. R., Ackerman, F., Kiron, D. 1997The Consumer SocietyIsland PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordier, A. 2003Het effect van ethische communicatieGhent UniversityGhentM. Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  22. Grunert, K. G. 2005“Food Quality and Safety: Consumer Perception and Demand”European Review of Agricultural Economics32369391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grunert, S. C., Juhl, H. J. 1995“Values, Environmental Attitudes, and Buying of Organic Foods”Journal of Economic Psychology163962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iacobucci, D. 2001“Methodological and Statistical Concerns of the Experimental Behavioral Researcher: Introduction”Journal of Consumer Psychology1012Google Scholar
  25. IGD (Institute of Grocery Distribution), Consumer attitudes to ‘Eat the View’: part two – store exit interviews, Report prepared for the Countryside Agency by the IGD, Letchmore Heath, Watford, Herts. [online] [cited 14.07.2003] URL: pdf, 2002aGoogle Scholar
  26. IGD (Institute of Grocery Distribution), UK consumers put price before the environment, animal welfare and fair trade, Press release – 21.11.2002. [online] [cited 07.05.2003] URL:, 2002bGoogle Scholar
  27. Jager, W. 2000Modelling consumer behaviorUniversity of GroningenGroningenPhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen, K. K., Sandoe, P. 2002“Food Safety and Ethics: The Interplay between Science and Values”Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics15245253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kokkinaki, F., Lunt, P. 1997“The Relationship between Involvement, Attitude Accessibility and Attitude-Behavior Consistency”British Journal of Social Psychology36497509Google Scholar
  30. Kraus, S. J. 1995“Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior – a Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin215875Google Scholar
  31. Lee, J. A., Holden, S. J. S. 1999“Understanding the Determinants of Environmentally Conscious Behavior”Psychology and Marketing16373392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacGillivray, A. 2000The Fair Share, The growing market share of green and ethical productsNew Economics FoundationLondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Maignan, I., Ferrel, O. C. 2001“Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: An Investigation of French Businesses”Journal of Business Research513751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meulenberg, M. 2003“Consument en burger, betekenis voor de markt van landbouwproducten en voedingsmiddelen” [Consumer and citizen, meaning for the market of agricultural products and food products]Tijdschrift voor Sociaal Wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de Landbouw184356Google Scholar
  35. Minteer, B. A., Corley, E. A., Manning, R. E. 2004“Environmental Ethics Beyond Principle? The Case for a Pragmatic Contextualism”Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics17131156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MORI2000European attitudes towards corporate social responsibilityMOROLondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Reheul, D., Mathijs, E., Relaes, J. 2001Elements for a future view with respect to sustainable agri- and horticulture in Flanders, Report from the project ``Sustainable Agriculture''StedulaGhentGoogle Scholar
  38. Roberts, J. A. 1995“Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior: A cluster Analytic Approach and its Implications for Marketing”Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice397118Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, J. A. 1996“Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and Implications for Advertising”Journal of Business Research36217231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, R., Smith, C. 2002“Psychosocial and Demographic Variables Associated with Consumer Intention to Purchase Sustainable Produced Foods as Defined by the Midwest Food Alliance”Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior34316325Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, S. H. 1992“Universals in the Content and Structure of Values – Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology25165Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, S. H. 1994“Are there Universal Aspects in the Structure and Content of Human Values?”Journal of Social Issues501945Google Scholar
  43. SDC (Sustainable Development Commission), A vision for sustainable agriculture, URL:, 2003
  44. Shamdasani, P., Chon-Lin, C. O., Richmond, D. 1993“Exploring Green Consumers in an Orientic Culture: Role of Personal and Marketing Mix Factors”Advances in Consumer Research20488493Google Scholar
  45. Shrum, L. J., McCarty, J. A., Lowrey, T. M. 1995“Buyer Characteristics of the Green Consumer and their Implications for Advertising Strategy”Journal of Advertising247182Google Scholar
  46. Sikula, A., Costa, A. D. 1994“Are Women More Ethical Then Men”Journal of Business Ethics13859871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tallontire, A., Rentsendorj, E., Blowfield, M. 2001Ethical Consumers and Ethical Trade: A Review of Current Literature, Policy Series 12Natural Resources InstituteKentGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanner, C., Kast, S. W. 2003“Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers”Psychology and Marketing20883902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thogersen, J. 2001“Consumer Values, Behavior and Sustainable Development”Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research4207209Google Scholar
  50. Tsalikis, J., Ortiz-Buonafina, M. 1990“Ethical Beliefs''’ Differences of Males and Females”Journal of Business Ethics9509517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vannoppen, J.W., Verbeke, , Huylenbroeck, G. 2002“Consumer Value Structures Towards Supermarket Versus Farm Shop Purchase of Apples from Integrated Production in Belgium”British Food Journal104828844Google Scholar
  52. Verbeke, W. 2005“Agriculture and the Food Industry in the Information Age”European Review of Agricultural Economics32347368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verbeke, W., Vackier, I. 2004“Profile and Effects of Consumer Involvement in Fresh Meat”Meat Science67159168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verbeke, W., Viaene, J. 1999“Consumer Attitude to Beef Quality Labels and Associations with Beef Quality Labels”Journal of International Food and Agribusiness104565Google Scholar
  55. Verbeke, W. and R. W. Ward (2006), “Consumer Interest in Beef Quality and Country-of- Origin: An Application of Ordered Probit Models to Belgium Beef Labels,” Food Quality and Preference 17, in pressGoogle Scholar
  56. Vermeir, I., Verbeke, W. 2004Sustainable food consumption, involvement, certainly and values: an application of the theory of Planned BehaviorDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Ghent UniversityGhentWorking PaperGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitell, S. J., Singhapakdi, A., Thomas, J. 2001“Consumer Ethics: An Application and Empirical testing of the Hunt-Vitell Theory of Ethics”Journal of Consumer Marketing18153179Google Scholar
  58. Weatherell, C., Tregear, A., Allinson, J. 2003“In Search of the Concerned Consumer: UK Public Perceptions of Food, Farming and Buying Local”Journal of Rural Studies19233244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. World Bank (2003), “World Development Report 2003“, in, Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World, Transforming Institutions, Growth and Quality of Life, New York: Oxford University Press for World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationHogeschool GentGentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsGhent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations