Do Non-Native Species Threaten The Natural Environment?

  • Mark SagoffEmail author


Conservation biologists and other environmentalists confront five obstacles in building support for regulatory policies that seek to exclude or remove introduced plants and other non-native species that threaten to harm natural areas or the natural environment. First, the concept of “harm to the natural environment” is nebulous and undefined. Second, ecologists cannot predict how introduced species will behave in natural ecosystems. If biologists cannot define “harm” or predict the behavior of introduced species, they must target all non-native species as potentially “harmful”. an impossibly large regulatory task. Third, loss of species richness may constitute harm to an environment, but introduced organisms typically, generally, and significantly add to species richness in ecosystems. If species richness correlates with desirable ecosystem properties, moreover, such as stability and productivity, as some ecologists believe, then introduced organisms, by increasing species richness, would support those desirable properties. Fourth, one may plausibly argue that extinction constitutes environmental harm, but there is no evidence that non-native species, especially plants, are significant causes of extinction, except for predators in certain lakes and other small island-like environments. Fifth, while aesthetic, ethical, and spiritual values may provide a legitimate basis for invasive species policy, biologists often cite concepts such as “biodiversity” and ecosystem “health” or “integrity” to provide a scientific justification. To assert that non-native species threaten biodiversity or undermine ecosystem health, however, may be to draw conceptual entailments or consequences from definitions of “biodiversity” and “integrity” that arbitrarily exclude non-native species or make the presence of exotic species a per se indicator of decline.


Biodiversity ecosystems invasive species plant breeding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, William, “Invasive Plants Get Attention at Botanical Workshop”. St. Louis Post Dispatch December 3 (2002).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. G. 1995“Interactions Between Lythrum Salicaria and Native Organisms: A Critical Review”Environmental Management19225231Google Scholar
  3. Angermeier, P. L., Karr, J. R. 1994“Biological Integrity Versus Biological Diversity as Policy Directives: Protecting Biotic Resources”BioScience44690697Google Scholar
  4. Balirwa, J. S. 1995“The Lake Victoria environment: Its fisheries and wetlands – a review”Wetlands Ecology and Management3209224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskin, Y. 2002“The Greening of Horticulture: New Codes of Conduct Aim to Curb Plant Invasions”BioScience52464Google Scholar
  6. Blossey, B., Skinner, L. C., Taylor, J. 2001“Impact and Management of Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America”Biodiversity and Conservation1017871807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BONAP, Invasive Species Database Search ( The Biota of North America Program (Universiy of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 1999).Google Scholar
  8. Burda, R. I.,  et al. 1998“Examples of Invasions by Threatened Native Species in Anthropogenous Ecotypes”Starfinger, U. eds. Plant Invasions, Ecological Mechanisms and Human ResponsesBackhuysLeiden299306Google Scholar
  9. Carlton, J., “Invasions in the World’s Oceans: How Much Do We Know, and What Does the Future Hold?” (2004). Lecture delivered at the March 2004 meeting of the American Institute of Biological Sciences. Recorded and available on line at: Scholar
  10. Chew, M. K., Laubichler, M. D. 2003“Natural enemies – Metaphor or Misconception?”Science3015253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chicago Botanic Garden Invasive Species Policy, (2002) Available on line at: Scholar
  12. Clay, K. 1995“Correlates of Pathogen Species Richness in the Grass Family”Canadian Journal Botany73S42S49Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, A. N. and J. T. Carlton, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in a United States Estuary: A Case Study of the Biological Invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta. A Report for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC and The National Sea Grant College Program Connecticut Sea Grant Program. Available on line at: Scholar
  14. Colautti, R. I., MacIsaac, H. J. 2004“A Neutral Terminology to Define Invasive Species”Diversity and Distributions10135141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colautti, , Robert, I., Anthony, Ricciardi, Igor A., Grigorovich, Hugh J., MacIsaac 2004“Is Invasion Success Explained by the Enemy Release Hypothesis?”Ecology Letters7721733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cornell, H. V., Lawton, J. H. 1992“Species Interactions, Local and Regional Processes, and Limits to the Richness of Ecological Communities: A Theoretical Perspective”Journal of Animal Ecology61112Google Scholar
  17. Cottingham, K. L., Brown, B. L., Lennon, J. T. 2001“Biodiversity may Regulate the Temporal Variability of Ecological Systems”Ecological Letters47285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowie, R. H. 1995“Identity, Distribution and Impacts of Introduced Ampullariidae and Viviparidae in the Hawaiian Islands”Journal of Medical and Applied Malacology56167Google Scholar
  19. Davis, M. A., Thompson, K., Grime, J. P. 2001“Charles Elton S. and the Dissociation of Invasion Ecology from the Rest of Ecology”Diversity and Distributions797102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, M. A. 2003“Biotic Globalization: Does Competition from Introduced Species Threaten Biodiversity?”BioScience53481489Google Scholar
  21. Davis, M. A., Thompson, K. 2001“Invasion Terminology: Should Ecologists Define their Terms Differently than others? No, not if we want to be any help!”ESA Bulletin82206Google Scholar
  22. Castri, F. 1989“History of Biological Invasions with Special Emphasis on the Old World”Drake, J. A.Mooney, H. A.Castri, F.Groves, R. H.Kruger, F. J.Rejmánek, M.Williamson, M. eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Scope 37John Wiley and SonsChichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. Dowdell, Jennifer, “An Unlikely Alliance: Professionals Counter alien Plant Invasions with a United Front,” Landscape Architecture March (2002).Google Scholar
  24. Ehrenfeld, D. W., “Adulusian Bog Hounds,” Orion Autumn (1999), 9–11.Google Scholar
  25. Eldredge, L., Miller, S. 1995“How Many Species are there in Hawai’i?”Bishop B.P. Museum Occasional Papers41318Google Scholar
  26. Elton, C. S. 1958The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and PlantsMethuen and Co., LtdLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Executive Order. 1999. No. 13112. Invasive species. Scholar
  28. Farnsworth, E. J., Ellis, D. R. 2001“Is Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) an Invasive Threat to Freshwater Wetlands? Conflicting Evidence from Several Ecological Metrics”Wetlands21199209Google Scholar
  29. Forcella, F. 1984“Ecological Biotechnology”Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America65434Google Scholar
  30. Fox, J. W., McGrady-Steed, J., Petchey, O. L. 2000“Testing for Local Species Saturation with Nonindependent Regional Species Pools”Ecology Letters3198206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Glass, P., 1944. “Jefferson and Plant introduction,”National Horticultural Magazine 23 (1994), 127–31.Google Scholar
  32. Global Invasive Species Program (GISP), International Convention on Biodiversity. Available on line at: (1999).Google Scholar
  33. Goldschmidt, T. 1996Darwin’s Dreampond: Drama in Lake VictoriaMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray. A., “The Pertinacity and Predominance of Weeds” The American Journal of Science and Arts, vol XVIII; reprinted in Ronald L. Stuckey (eds.), Essays on North American Plant Geography From The Nineteenth Century (Arno Press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
  35. Gurevitch, J., Padilla, D. K. 2004“Are Invasive Species a Major Cause of Extinctions?”Trends in Ecology and Evolution19470474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hager, H. A., McCoy, K. D. 1998“The Implications of Accepting Untested Hypotheses: A Review of the Effects of Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America”Biodiversity and Conservation710691079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Healey, B. J. 1975The Plant HuntersScribner’sNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Hector, A., Joshi, J., Lawler, S. P., Spehn, E. M., Wilby, A. 2001“Conservation Implications of the Link between Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning”Oecologia129624628Google Scholar
  39. Hobbs, R. J., Humphries, S. E. 1995“An Integrated Approach to the Ecology and Management of Plant Invasions”Conservation Biology9761770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Holland, R. E., Johengen, T. H., Beeton, A. M. 1995“Trends in Nutrient Concentrations in Hatchery Bay, western Lake Erie, before and after Dreissena polymorpha”Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science5212021209Google Scholar
  41. Hooper, D. U., Vitousek, P. M. 1997“The Effects of Plant Composition and Diversity on Ecosystem Processes”Science27713021305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Houlahan, J. E., Findlay, C. S. August 2004“Effect of Invasive Plant Species on Temperate Wetland Plant Diversity”Conservation Biology1811321138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hubbell, S. P. 2001The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and BiogeographyPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. Huston, M. A. 1994Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing LandscapesCambridge University PressCambridge (UK)Google Scholar
  45. Hyland, H. L. 1977“History of US Plant introduction”Environmental Review42633Google Scholar
  46. Jacobs, J. 1975“Diversity, Stability and Maturity in Ecosystems Influenced by Human Activities”Van Dobben, W. H.Lowe-McConnell, R. H. eds. Unifying Concepts in EcologyJunkThe Hague187207Google Scholar
  47. Jaffe, M. 1994And No Birds Sing: The Story of an Ecological Disaster in a Tropical ParadiseSimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Kinzig, A. P.Pacala, S. W.Tilman, D. eds. 2002The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical ExtensionsPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
  49. Kloppenburg, J. R.,Jr. 1988First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant BiotechnologyCambridge University PressNew York14922000Google Scholar
  50. Kowarik, I. 1990“Some Responses of Flora and Vegetation to Urbanization in Central Europe”Sukopp, H.Mejny, S.Kowarik, I. eds. Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban EnvironmentsSPB Academic PublishingThe Hague4574Google Scholar
  51. Lawler, S. P., Armesto, J. J., Kareiva, P. 2002“How Relevant to Conservation are Studies Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning?”Kinzig, A. P.Pacala, S. W.Tilman, D. eds. The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical ExtensionsPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ294320Google Scholar
  52. Lemmon, K. 1968The Golden Age of Plant HuntersPhoenix HouseLondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Levine, J. M. 2000“Species Diversity and Biological Invasions: Relating Local Process to Community Pattern”Science288852854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lonsdale, W. M. 1999“Global Patterns of Plant Invasions and the Concept of Invasibility”Ecology8015221536Google Scholar
  55. Loope, L. L., F. G. Howarth, F. Kraus, and T. K. Pratt, “Newly Emergent and Future Threats of Alien Species to Pacific Landbirds and Ecosystems,” in J. M. Scott, S. Conant, and C. van Riper III (eds.), Proceedings of Symposium on Threats to Pacific Landbirds and Endangered Ecosystems, Hilo, Hawaii, May1–2, 1997. Cooper Ornithological Society, Studies in Avian Biology (1999).Google Scholar
  56. Loreau, M., Mouquet, N. 1999“Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity”American Naturalist154427440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, P., Hector, A., Hopper, D. U., Huston, M. A., Raffaelli, D., Schymidt, B., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A. 2001“Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and Future Challenges”Science294804808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Luken, J. O., John W., Thieret 1996“Amur Honeysuckle, its fall from Grace”BioScience461824Google Scholar
  59. MacArthur, R. H. 1972Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of SpeciesHarper and RowNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., Bazzaz, F. A. 2000“Biotic Invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global consequences and Control”Ecological Applications10689710Google Scholar
  61. McCann, K. 2000“The Diversity-stability Debate. 2000”Nature405228233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. McKinney, M. L., Lockwood, J. L. 1999“Biotic Homogenization: A Few Winners Replacing Many Losers in the Next Mass Extinction”TREE14450453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. McKnight, B. N. eds. 1993Biological Pollution: The Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic SpeciesIndiana Academy of SciencesIndianapolis. INGoogle Scholar
  64. McNeely, J. A., “The great reshuffling: How alien species help feed the global economy,” IUCN Web Page; on line at: (2001).Google Scholar
  65. McNeely, J. A., “Cities, Nature, and Protected Areas: a General Introduction,” Paper presented to Symposium on Natural Areas in Conurbations and on City Outskirts, Barcelona, Spain, 25–27 October (1995).Google Scholar
  66. Mooney, H. A. and E. E. Cleland, “The Evolutionary Impact of Invasive Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 98, 10, 5446. (2001).Google Scholar
  67. Morrison, J. A. 2002“Wetland Vegetation before and after Experimental Purple Loosestrife Removal”Wetlands22159169Google Scholar
  68. Morton, B., “The Aquatic Nuisance Species Problem: A Global Perspective and Review,” in Frank D’itri (ed.), Zebra Mussels and Other Aquatic Nuisance Species (Ann Arbor Press, Ann Asrbor, MI, (1996). Scholar
  69. Munawar, M., Munawar, I. F., Dermott, R., Niblock, H., Carou, S. 2001“Is Lake Erie a resilient ecosystem?”Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management57993Google Scholar
  70. National Invasive Species Council, National Invasive Species Management Plan. Available on line at: (2001).Google Scholar
  71. National Research Council (NRC)2002Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Board on Life SciencesNational Academy of ScienceWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  72. National Research Council (NRC)1997Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable WorldNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  73. Ojaveer, H., Leppäkoski, E., Olenin, S., Ricciardi, A. 2002“Ecological Impact of Ponto-caspian invaders in the Baltic Sea, European inland waters and the great lakes: An inter-ecosystem comparison”Leppäkoski, E.Gollsch, S.Olenin, S. eds. Invasive Aquatic Species of EuropeKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  74. Parker, I. M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P. M., Williamson, M. H., Von Holle, B., Moyle, P. B., Byers, J. E., Goldwasser, L. 1994“Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders”Biological Invasions1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., Morrison, D. January 2000“Environmental and Economic Costs Associated with Non-indigenous Species in the United States”BioScience505365Google Scholar
  76. Pollan, M. 1994“Against Nativism”New York Times MagazineMay 155255Google Scholar
  77. Reichard Sarah, H., Peter, White 2001“Horticulture as a Pathway of Invasive Plant Introductions in the United States”Bioscience51103113Google Scholar
  78. Rejmanek, M., Richardson, D. M., Barbour, M. G., Crawley, M. J., Hrusa, G. F., Moyle, P. B., Randall, J. M., Simberloff, D., Williamson, M. 2002“Biological Invasions: Politics and the Discontinuity of Ecological Terminology”ESA Bulletin83131133Google Scholar
  79. Richardson, D. M., Pysek, P., Rejmanek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D., West, C. J. 2000“Naturalization and Invasion of Alien Plants: Concepts and Definitions”Diversity and Distributions693107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Richter, B. D., Braun, D. P., Mendelson, M. A., Master, L. L. 1997“Threats to Imperiled Freshwater Fauna”Conservation Biology1110811093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ricklefs, R. E. 1987“Community Diversity: Relative roles of Local and Regional Processes”Science235167171Google Scholar
  82. Rosenzweig, M. 2001“The Four Questions: What does the Introduction of Exotic Species do to Biodiversity?”Evolutionary Ecology Research3361367Google Scholar
  83. Ruesink, J. L., Parker, I. M., Groom, M. J., Kareiva, P. 1995“Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Reducing the Risks of Non-Indigenous Species Introductions”Bioscience45465477Google Scholar
  84. Sala, O. E.,  et al. 2000“Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the year 2100”Science28717701774CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Sarkar, S. 2002“Defining ’Biodiversity’: Assessing Biodiversity”Monist85131155Google Scholar
  86. Sax, D. F., Gaines, S. D., Brown, J. H. 2002“Species Invasions Exceed Extinctions on Islands Worldwide: A Comparative Study of Plants and Birds”American Naturalist160766783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schemske, D. W., Husband, B. C., Ruckelshaus, M. H., Goodwillie, C., Parker, I. M., Bishop, J. G. 1994“Evaluating Approaches to the Conservation of Rare and Endangered Plants”Ecology75584606Google Scholar
  88. Schmitz, D. C. and D. Simberloff, “Biological Invasions: A Growing Threat,” Issues in Science and Technology 13:4 (Summer) (1997), 33–41. Available on line at Scholar
  89. Schwartz, M. W., Brigham, C. A., Hoeksema, J. D., Lyons, K. G., Mills, M. H., Van Mantgem, P. J. 2000“Linking Biodiversity to Ecosystem Function: Implications for Conservation Ecology”Oecologia122297305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Shrader-Frechette, K. S. 2001“Non-indigenous Species and Ecological Explanation”Biology and Philosophy16507519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simberloff, D., “Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,” Consequences 2(2) (1996). Available on line at vol2no2/article2.htmlGoogle Scholar
  92. Simberloff, D., “Nonindigenous Species – A Global Threat to Biodiversity and Stability,” in Peter H. Raven and T. Williams (eds.), Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World, Committee for the Second Forum on Biodiversity, National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council, Washington, DC (1997), On line at: Scholar
  93. Simberloff, D. 2003“Confronting Introduced Species: A Form of Xenophobia?”Biological Invasions5179192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Simberloff, D., Strong, D. R. 2000“Exotic Species Seriously Threaten Our Environment”Chronicle of Higher Education47B20Google Scholar
  95. Simberloff, D., Von Holle, B. 1999“Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasion Meltdown?”Bioloical Invasions12132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Smith, S., G. Bell, and E. Bermingham, “Cross-Cordillera Exchange Mediated by the Panama Canal Increased the Species Richness of Local Freshwater Fish Assemblages,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (2004), online. See: Scholar
  97. Srivastava, D. S. 1999“Using Local-Regional Richness Plots to Test for Species Saturation: Pitfalls and Potentials”Journal of Animal Ecology68116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. St. Louis Declaration on Invasive Plant Species, Missouri Botanical Garden (2001), Available on line at: Scholar
  99. Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., Chong, G. W., Kalkhan, M. A., Schell, L. D., Bull, K. A., Otsuki, Y., Newman, G., Bashkin, M., Son, Y. 1999“Exotic Plant Species Invade Hot Spots of Native Plant Diversity”Ecological Monographs692546Google Scholar
  100. Strayer, D. L., Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., Pace, M. L. 1999“Transformation of Freshwater Ecosystems by Bivalves”BioScience491927Google Scholar
  101. Takacs, D. 1996The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of ParadiseThe Johns Hopkins University PressBaltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  102. Tilman, D 1997“Community Invasibility, Recruitment Limitation, and Grassland Biodiversity”Ecology788182Google Scholar
  103. Treberg, M. A., Husband, B. C. 1999“Relationship Between the Abundance of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) and Plant Species Richness along the Bar River, Canada”Wetlands19118125Google Scholar
  104. US Geological Survey (USGS), Invasive Plant Species. CINDI: Center for Integration of Natural Disaster Information, (2003), Available on line at: Scholar
  105. Vermeij, G. 1996“An Agenda for Invasion Biology”Biological Conservation7839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vitousek, P. M. 1990“Biological Invasions and Ecosystem Processes; Towards an Integration of Population Biology and Ecosystem Studies”Oikos57713Google Scholar
  107. Wagner, W. H. 1993“Problems with Biotic Invasives: A Biologist’s Viewpoint”McKnight, B. N. eds. Biological Pollution: The Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic SpeciesIndiana Academy of ScienceIndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  108. Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Steiner, C. F., Mittelbach, G., Gough, L., Dodson, S. I., Juday, G. P., Parmenter, R. 1999“The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness”Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics30257300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Whitt, M. B., Prince, H. H., Cox, R. R.,Jr. 1999“Avian use of Purple Loosestrife Dominated Habitat Relative to Other Vegetation Types in a Lake Huron Wetland Complex”The Wilson Bulletin111105114Google Scholar
  110. Whittle, T. 1970The Plant HuntersChilton Book CoPhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  111. Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., Losos, E. 1988“Quantifying Threats to Imperiled Species in the United States”BioScience48607615Google Scholar
  112. Williamson, M. 1996Biological InvasionsChapman & HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  113. Withgott, J. 2004“Are Invasive Species Born Bad?”Science3051100110120 AugustCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. World Resources Institute (WRI), World Resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme, World Bank, World Resources Institute. Washington, DC (2000), Available on line at: Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Philosophy and Public PolicyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations