Advertisement

Agro-Biodiversity Conservation in Europe: Ethical Issues

  • Valeria NegriEmail author
Article

Abstract

While it is commonly acknowledged that the ecosystemic, and the inter- and intra-specific diversity of “natural” life is under threat of being irremediably lost, there is much less awareness that the diversity in agro-ecosystems is also under threat. This paper is focused on the biodiverse agro-ecosystems generated by landraces (LRs), i.e., farmer-developed populations of cultivated species that show among- and within-population diversity and are linked to traditional cultures. The aim of this work is to arouse concern about their loss, to explain how they can be conserved, and to discuss values that support maintaining and/or restoring on-farm agro-biodiversity. Although agriculture has relied on biodiverse agro-ecosystems for millennia, most of them have disappeared or are disappearing due to profound transformations in the socio-economic context. This is discussed with particular reference to the European situation. The positive values of LRs and LR systems that support their conservation are discussed along with possible objections. The conservation of LRs and LR systems can be well justified on ethical grounds. In particular, the complex intertwining of the biological and cultural contexts of LR systems, which continuously creates new adaptive responses to the changing socio-economic and eco-physical processes, is a value that strongly motivates conservation, particularly when the needs of future generations are considered.

Keywords

biodiversity complexity ethics landraces on-farm conservation sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altieri, M. A., Merrick, L. C. 1987In Situ Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources through Maintenance of Traditional Farming SystemsEconomic Botany418696Google Scholar
  2. Archer, G. 2003A Study of Farm Outlets in North West EnglandBritish Food Journal105531541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, G., Sánchez, J. G., Vignali, G., Chaillot, A. 2003Latent Consumers’ Attitude to Farmers’ Markets in North West EnglandBritish Food Journal105487497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asfaw, Z., “The Barleys of Ethiopia,” in S. B. Brush (ed.), Genes in the Field (IPGRI, Rome; IDRC, Ottawa; Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), pp. 3–26Google Scholar
  5. Beedell, J., Rehman, T. 2000Using Social-Psychology Models to Understand Farmers’ Conservation BehaviourJournal of Rural Studies16117127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellon, M. R. 1996The Dynamics of Crop Infraspecific Diversity: A Conceptual Framework at the Farmer LevelEconomic Botany502639Google Scholar
  7. Black, J. N. 1971Energy Relations in Crop Production – A Preliminary SurveyAnnals of Applied Biology67272278Google Scholar
  8. Brummer, E. C. 1998Diversity, Stability and Sustainable American AgricultureAgronomy Journal9012Google Scholar
  9. Brush, S. B. 1992Ethnoecology, Biodiversity and Modernization in Andean Potato AgricultureJournal of Ethnobiology12161185Google Scholar
  10. Brush S. B., “The Issues of In Situ Conservation of Crop Genetic Resources,” in S. B. Brush (ed.), Genes in the Field, (IPGRI, Rome; IDRC, Ottawa; Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), pp. 3–26Google Scholar
  11. Brush, S. B., Meng, E. 1998Farmers’ Valuation and Conservation of Crop Genetic ResourcesGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution45139150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callicott, J. B. 2002The Pragmatic Power and Promise of Theoretical and Environmental Ethics: Forging a New DiscourseEnvironmental Values11325Google Scholar
  13. Callicott, J. B., Mumford, K. 1997Ecological Sustainability as a Conservation ConceptConservation Biology113240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ceccarelli, S. and S. Grando, “Barley Landraces from the Fertile Crescent: A Lesson for Plant Breeders,” in S. B. Brush (ed.), Genes in the Field (IPGRI, Rome; IDRC, Ottawa; Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), pp. 51–76Google Scholar
  15. Esquinas-Alcazar, J. T. 1993Plant Genetic ResourcesHayward, M. D.Bosemark, N. O.Romagosa, I. eds. Plant Breeding: Principles and ProspectsChapman & HallLondon3351Google Scholar
  16. EUROSTAT – II Sole 24 Ore, L’Europa in Cifre (CECA-CE-CEEA, Bruxelles, Luxembourg, 1999)Google Scholar
  17. Faeth, P. 1993Agricultural Policy and Sustainability: Case Studies from India, Chile and The U.SWorld Research InstituteWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankel, O. H., Brown, A. D. H., Burdon, J. J. 1995The Conservation of Plant BiodiversityCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Geoffroy, V., Sicard, D., Oliveira, J. C. F., Sevignac, M., Cohen, S., Gepts, P., Neema, C., Langin, T., Dron, M. 1999Identification of an Ancestral Resistance Gene Cluster Involved in Coevolution Processes between phaseolus vulgaris and Its Fungal Pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianumMolecular Plant Microbe Interactions12774784Google Scholar
  20. Gepts, P. 2002A Comparison between Crop Domestication, Classical Plant Breeding and Genetic EngineeringCrop Science4217801790Google Scholar
  21. Grigg, D., Storia dell’ Agricoltura in Occidente (The Transformation of Agriculture in the West, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1992) (Il Mulino, Bologna, Italy, 1994)Google Scholar
  22. Halfacree, K. H. 1995Talking About Rurality. Social Representations of the Rural as Expressed by Residents of Six English ParishesJournal of Rural Studies11120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammer, K., Knupffer, H., Laghetti, G., Perrino, P. 1999Seeds From The Past. A Catalogue of Crop Germplasm in Central and North ItalyGermplasm Institute of C.N.R.Bari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammer, K., Gladis, Th., Diederichsen, A. 2003In Situ and On Farm Management of Plant Genetic ResourcesEuropean Journal of Agronomy19509517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harlan, J. R. 1992Crops and Man2ASA-CSSAMadison, WI117133Google Scholar
  26. IUCN, The World Conservation Strategy (IUCN, Gland, 1980)Google Scholar
  27. Jones, O. 1995Lay Discourses of the Rural: Developments and Implications for Rural StudiesJournal of Rural Studies113549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leopold, A., A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There (Oxford University Press, New York, 1949). Foreward, viiiGoogle Scholar
  29. Le Coeur, D., Baudry, J., Burel, F., Thenail, C. 2002Why and How We Should Study Field Boundary Biodiversity in an Agrarian LandscapeAgriculture, Ecosystem and Environment892340Google Scholar
  30. Louette, D., “Traditional Management of Seed and Genetic Diversity: What Is a Landrace?” in S. B. Brush (ed.), Genes in the Field (IPGRI, Rome; IDRC, Ottawa; Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), pp. 109–142Google Scholar
  31. Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B. V., Hawkes, J. G. 1997Complementary Conservation StrategiesMaxted, N.Ford-Lloyd, B. V.Hawkes, J. G. eds. Plant Genetic ConservationChapman and HallLondon1539Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, E. J. P., Moonen, A. C. 2002Field Margins in Northern Europe: Their Functions and Interactions with AgricultureAgriculture, Ecosystem and Environment89521Google Scholar
  33. Matson, P. A., W. J. Parton, A. G. Power, and M. J. Swift, “Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties.” Science 277 (25 July 1997), 504–509Google Scholar
  34. Negri, V. 2003Landraces in Central Italy: Where and Why they Are Conserved and Perspectives for their On Farm ConservationGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution50871885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Negri, V., H. Becker, J. Onnela, A. Sartori, S. Strajeru, and B. Laliberté, “A First Inventory of On Farm Conservation and Management Activities in Europe Including Some Examples of Cooperation between the Formal and Informal Sector,” in B. Lalibertè, L. Maggioni, N. Maxted, and V. Negri (compilers), Report of the ECP/GR In situ/on farm Conservation Network Task Forces Meeting, Isola Polvese, Perugia, 19– 21 May (IPGRI, Rome, 2000), pp. 14–30Google Scholar
  36. Norton, B. G. 2000Biodiversity and Environmental Values: In Search of a Universal Earth EthicBiodiversity and Conservation910291044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nowosielka, D. and W. Podyma, “Collection Missions in the Territory of Poland During 1998–1999,” in W. Swiecicki, B. Naganowska, and B. Wolko (eds.), Broad Variation and Precise Characterisation, Proc. Eucarpia Genetic Resources Section Meeting, Poznan, Poland (May 16–20, 2001), pp. 67–70Google Scholar
  38. Paoletti, M. 2001Biodiversity in Agroecosystems and Bioindicators of Environmental HealthShiyomi, M.Koizumi, H. eds. Structure and Function in Agroecosystems Design and Management. Advances in Agroecology.CRC pressBoca Raton, FL1144Google Scholar
  39. Papa, C., “The ‘farre de Montelione’: Landrace and Representation,” in S. Padulosi, K. Hammer, and J. Heller (eds.), Hulled Wheats. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilised and Neglected Crops. 4. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats, 21–22 July, 1995, Castelvecchio Pascoli, Italy (IPGRI, Rome, 1996), pp. 154–171Google Scholar
  40. Papa, C., “Il farro a Monteleone di Spoleto: Pratiche Agrarie, Consuetudini Giuridiche e Ritualità,’ in C. Papa (ed.), Il Farro. Saperi, Usi e Conservazione Delle Varietà Locali. Quaderni del CEDRAV 1 (CEDRAV, Cerreto di Spoleto, Italy, 1999), pp. 9–26Google Scholar
  41. Pence, G. 2000A Dictionary of Common Philosophical TermsThe McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Piergiovanni, A. R., Laghetti, G. 1999The Common Bean Landraces from Basilicata (Southern Italy): An Example of Integrated Approach Applied to Genetic Resources ManagementGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution464752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pimentel, D., Heichel, G. H. 1991Energy and Sustainability of Farming SystemsLal, R.Pierce, F. J. eds. Soil Management for Sustainability.Soil and Water Conservation SocietyAnkeni, IA113123Google Scholar
  44. Pyrovetsi, M., Daoutopoulos, G. 1999Farmers Needs for Nature Conservation Education in GreeceJournal of Environmental Management56147157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rasmussen, P. E., K. W. T. Goulding, J. R. Brown, P. R. Grace, H. H. Janzen, and M. Korschens, “Long Term Agroecosystems Experiments: Assessing Agricultural Sustainability and Global Change,” Science, 282, (30 October 1998), 893–896Google Scholar
  46. Rolston, H.,III 1991Environmental Ethics: Values in and Duties to the Natural WorldBormann, F. H.Kellert, S. R. eds. The Broken Circle: Ecology, Economics, EthicsYale University PressNew Haven7395Google Scholar
  47. Rolston, H. III., “Value in Nature and the Nature of Value,” in R. Attfield and A. Belsey (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, Royal Institute of Philosophy Suppl. 36 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994), pp. 13–30Google Scholar
  48. Rolston, H.,III 2000The Land Ethic at the Turn of the MillenniumBiodiversity and Conservation910451058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rolston, H.,III 2003Environmental EthicsBunnin, N.Tsui-James, E. P. eds. The Blackwell Companion to PhilosophyBlackwell Publ.Oxford517530Google Scholar
  50. Rosa, H. D. 2000Conservação da Biodiversidade: Significado, Valorização e Implicações ÉticasRevista Jurídica do Urbanismo e do Ambiente14179204Google Scholar
  51. Russow, L-M. 2002Environment. Case Study: Marie the EnvinronmentalistComstock, G. eds. Life Science EthicsIowa State PressAmes93123Google Scholar
  52. The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/
  53. Tilman, D., “Global Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Expansion: The Need for Sustainable and Efficient Practices,” Proceeding of the National Academy of Science. USA 96 (May 1999), 5995–6000Google Scholar
  54. Tilman, D., “Causes, Consequences and Ethics of Biodiversity,” Nature 405 (11 May 2000), 208–211Google Scholar
  55. UNCED, Convention on Biological Diversity (Geneva, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992)Google Scholar
  56. Van Dam, F., Heins, S., Elbersen, B. S. 2002Lay Discourses of the Rural and Stated and Revealed Preferences for Rural Living. Some Evidence of the Existence of a Rural Idyll in the NetherlandsJournal of Rural Studies18461476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Dijk, G. 2001Biodiversity and Multifunctionality in European Agriculture: Priorities, Current Initiatives and Possible New DirectionsLaura, Buguna-Hoffmann eds. Agricultural Functions and Biodiversity – A European Stakeholder Approach to the CBD Agricultural Biodiversity Work ProgrammeEuropean Center for Nature ConservationTilburg123140Google Scholar
  58. Zeven, A. C. 1998Landraces: A Review of Definitions and ClassificationsEuphytica104127139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeven, A. C. 1996Results of Activities to Maintain Landraces and Other Material in Some European Countries In Situ Before 1945 and What We May Learn from ThemGenetic Resources and Crop Evolution43337341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ziemann, M., Thomas, S. 2003Wer Kauft Bio-Handelsmarken?Ernährungs-Umschau50b21b24Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, G. A., Hart, K. 2001Rural Co-operation and Participation. Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: Towards Conservation-Oriented Thinking?Sociologia Ruralis41254274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Worede, M., T. Tesemma, and R. Feyssa, “Keeping Diversity Alive: An Ethiopian Perspective,” in S. B. Brush (ed.), Genes in the Field(IPGRI, Rome; IDRC, Ottawa; Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, 2000), pp. 143–161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dip. Biologia Vegetale e Biotecnologie Agroambientali (Department of Plant Biology and Agro-Environmental Biotechnology)Università degli StudiPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations