Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 457–477 | Cite as

Naturalness In Biological Conservation

Article

Abstract

Conservation scientists are arguing whether naturalness provides a reasonable “imperative” for conservation. To clarify this debate and the interpretation of the term “natural,” I analyze three management strategies – ecosystem preservation, ecosystem restoration, and ecosystem engineering – with respect to the naturalness of their outcomes. This analysis consists in two parts. First, the ambiguous term “natural” is defined in a variety of ways, including (1) naturalness as that which is part of nature, (2) naturalness as a contrast to artifactuality, (3) naturalness as an historical independence from human actions, and (4) naturalness as possession of certain properties. After that, I analyze the different conceptions with respect to their implications for the three management strategies. The main conclusion is that there exists no single conception of naturalness that could distinguish between the outcomes of the three management methods. Therefore, as long as the outcomes of the different methods are regarded as being of a different value in conservation, we should either abandon the idea of naturalness as the guiding concept in conservation or use the term “natural” only in the ways that take both its historical and feature dependent meanings into consideration.

Keywords

conservation ecosystem engineering naturalness preservation restoration unnaturalness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.E. 1991A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating and Quantifying NaturalnessConservation Biology5347352Google Scholar
  2. Angermeier, P. 1994Does Biodiversity Include Artificial Diversity?Conservation Biology8600602Google Scholar
  3. Angermeier, P. 2000Natural Imperative for Biological ConservationConservation Biology14373381Google Scholar
  4. Angermeier, P.L., Karr, J.R. 1994Biological Integrity versus Biological Diversity as Policy DirectivesBioscience44690697Google Scholar
  5. Aristotele,  1984PhysicsBarnes, J. eds. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford TranslationPrinceton University PressPrinceton315446Google Scholar
  6. Banko, G., “Assessing and monitoring nature protection value of European landscapes using remote sensing and GIS tools”, in www.geoweb.cslm.hu/vhost/geoinfo/events/SAT/cd/pdf/GebhardBankoenvip.pdf, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Bowen, B.W. 1999Preserving Genes, Species, or Ecosystems Healing the Fractured Foundations of Conservation PolicyMolecular Ecology8510Google Scholar
  8. Brennan, A. 1984The Moral Standing of Natural ObjectsEnvironmental Ethics63556Google Scholar
  9. Burley, F.W. 1988The Tropical Forestry Action Plan: Recent Progress and New InitiativesWilson, E.O. eds. BiodiversityNational Academy PressWashington, DC403408Google Scholar
  10. Cairns, J. 1988Increasing Diversity by Restoring Damaged EcosystemsE.O., Wilson eds. BiodiversityNational Academy PressWashington, DC333343Google Scholar
  11. Callicott, J.B. 1996Do Deconstructive Ecology and Sociobiology Undermine Leopold’s Land Ethics?Environmental Ethics18353372Google Scholar
  12. Callicott, J.B., Crowder, L.B., Mumford, K. 2000Normative Concepts in Conservation Biology: Reply to Willers and HunterConservation Biology14575578Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, N.L., Bartuska, A.M., Brown, J.H., Carpenter, S., D’Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J.F., MacMahon, J.A., Noss, R.F., Parsons, D.J., Peterson, C.H., Turner, M.G., Woodmansee, R.G. 1996The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem ManagementEcological Applications6665691Google Scholar
  14. Comer, P. 1997An Unnamed LetterConservation Biology11301303Google Scholar
  15. Cowell, C.M. 1993Ecological Restoration and Environmental EthicsEnvironmental Ethics151932Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, D. 1980Actions, Reasons, and CausesDavidson, D. eds. Essays on Actions and EventsClarendon PressOxford319Google Scholar
  17. Elliot, E. 1982Faking NatureInquiry258193Google Scholar
  18. Grumbine, R.E. 1994aWhat is Ecosystem Management?Conservation Biology82738Google Scholar
  19. Grumbine, R.E. 1994aWildness, Wise Use, and Sustainable DevelopmentEnvironmental Ethics16227249Google Scholar
  20. Haila, Y. 1997A ‘Natural’ Benchmark for Ecosystem FunctionConservation Biology11300301Google Scholar
  21. Higgs, E.S. 1997What is Good Ecological Restoration?Conservation Biology11338348Google Scholar
  22. Hilpinen, R. 1993Authors and ArtifactsProceedings of Aristotelian Society93155178Google Scholar
  23. Hilpinen, R. 1995Belief Systems as ArtifactsThe Monist78136155Google Scholar
  24. Hunter, M. 1996Benchmarks for Managing Ecosystems: Are Human Activities Natural?Conservation Biology10695697Google Scholar
  25. Jax, K., Jones, C.G., Pickett, T.A. 1998Self-identity of Ecological UnitsOikos82253264Google Scholar
  26. Jordan, W.R. 1988Ecological Restoration: Reflection on a Half-Cebtury of Experience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison ArboretumWilson, E.O. eds. BiodiversityNational Academy PressWashington, DC311316Google Scholar
  27. Karafyllis, N. 2003Renewable Resources and the Idea of Nature – What Has Biotechnology Got to Do with it?Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics16328Google Scholar
  28. Katz, E. 1997aThe Big Lie: Human Restoration of NatureKatz, E. eds. Nature as Subject: Human Obligations and Natural CommunityRowan & LittlefieldLanham93108Google Scholar
  29. Katz, E. 1997bArtifacts and FunctionsKatz, E. eds. Nature as Subject:Human Obligations and Natural CommunityRowan & LittlefieldLanham121132Google Scholar
  30. Lee, K. 1999The Natural and the Artefactual: The Implications of Deep Science and Deep Technology for Environmental PhilosophyLexington BooksLanhamGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, K. 2003Philosophy and Revolutions in Genetics: Deep Science and Deep TechnologyPalgrave MacMillanBasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  32. Madsen, K.H., Holm, P.B., Lassen, J., Sandøe, P. 2003Ranking Genetically Modified Plants According to FamiliarityJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics15267278Google Scholar
  33. Matthews, E. 1988Aids and Sexual MoralityBioethics2119128Google Scholar
  34. McKibben, B. 1989The End of NatureRandom HouseNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary. 2003.Google Scholar
  36. Midgley, M. 1995Do What’s Natural, You Say?Pierce, C.VanDeVeer, D. eds. People, Penguins, and Plastic TreesWadsworth Publishing CompanyBelmont103105Google Scholar
  37. Mill, J.S. 1969Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, part 10: Essays on Ethics, Religion and SocietyToronto University PressTorontoGoogle Scholar
  38. Odum, H. T., Center for Wetlands at the University of Florida: Ecological Engineering. www.cfw.ufl., 2003.Google Scholar
  39. Oelschlaeger, M. 1999On the Conflation of Humans and NatureEnvironmental Ethics21223224Google Scholar
  40. Perlman, D. l., Adelson, G. 1997Biodiversity: Exploring Values and Priorities in ConservationBlackwell ScienceCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Povilitis, T. 2001Toward a Robust Natural Imperative for ConservationConservation Biology15533535Google Scholar
  42. Radcliffe, J. 1984The Sceptical FeministPenguin BooksHarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruse, M. 2003Darwin and Design: Does evolution have a purpose?Harvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Räikkä, J. and Rossi, K. Geenit ja etiikka: Kysymyksiä uuden geeniteknologian arvoista (WSOY, Helsinki, 2003). (In Finnish) [Genes and Ethics: Questions about Values of New Gene Technologies].Google Scholar
  45. Siipi, H. 2003Artefacts and Living ArtefactsEnvironmental Values12413430Google Scholar
  46. Snyder, G. 1990The Practice of the WildNorth Point PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group, The SER Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org., 2002.Google Scholar
  48. Soper, K. 1995What is Nature?Blackwell PublishersOxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Todd, J. 1988Restoring Diversity: The Search for a Social and Economic ContextWilson, E.O. eds. BiodiversityNational Academy PressWashington, DC344352Google Scholar
  50. Uhl, C. 1988Restoration of Degraded Lands in the Amazon BasinWilson, E.O. eds. BiodiversityNational Academy PressWashington, DC326332Google Scholar
  51. Varner, G.E. 1990Biological Functions and Biological InterestsSouthern Journal of Philosophy28251270Google Scholar
  52. Verhoog, H., Matze, M., van Bueren, E.L., Baars, T. 2003The Role of the Concept of Natural (Naturalness) in Organic FarmingJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics162949Google Scholar
  53. Vogel, S. 2003Environmental Philosophy after the End of NatureEnvironmental Ethics242339Google Scholar
  54. Wachbroit, R. 1994Normality as a Biological ConceptPhilosophy of Science61579591Google Scholar
  55. Williams, R. 1982Ideas of NatureWilliams, R. eds. Problems in Materialism and CultureVerso Editors and NLBLondon6785Google Scholar
  56. Zechmeister, H., Tribsch, A., Moser, D., Wrbka, T. 2002Distribution on Endangered Bryophytes in Austrian Agricultural LandscapesBiological Conservation103173182Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations