Advertisement

Factors Influencing Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduate Students at Russian Universities

  • Natalia MaloshonokEmail author
  • Evgeniia Shmeleva
Article

Abstract

Student academic dishonesty is a pervasive problem for universities all over the world. The development of innovative practices and interventions for decreasing dishonest behaviour requires understanding factors influencing academic dishonesty. Previous research showed that personal, environmental, and situational factors affect dishonest behaviour at a university. The set of factors and the strength of their influence can differ across countries. There is a lack of research on factors affecting student dishonesty in Russia. A sample of 15,159 undergraduate students from eight Russian highly selective universities was surveyed to understand what factors influence their decision to engage in dishonest behaviour. Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was employed to explain dishonest behaviour among students. The explained variance in the engagement in academic dishonesty equals 48% in the model for the full sample, and reaches 69% in the model for one of the considered institutions. The major findings of this study were: (1) subjective norms appeared to dominate as the strongest predictor of academic dishonesty across the Russian universities; (2) perceived behavioural control, appeared to be positively related to the dishonest behaviour. In the majority of universities, this factor was found to be insignificant. This finding indicates a specific feature of Russian students’ an ethical decision-making process discussed in the last part of the paper.

Keywords

Academic dishonesty Theory of planned behaviour Undergraduate students Russian universities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support from the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire. Resource document. http://www.unibielefeld.de/ikg/zick/ajzen%20construction%20a%20tpb%20questionnaire.pdf. Accessed 03 April 2017.
  3. AL-Dossary, S. A. (2017). Why do College students cheat? A structural equation modeling validation of the theory of planned behavior. International Education Studies, 10(8), 40.Google Scholar
  4. Alleyne, P., & Phillips, K. (2011). Exploring academic dishonesty among university students in Barbados: An extension to the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 323–338.Google Scholar
  5. Altbach, P. (2015). The question of corruption. International Higher Education, 34, 7–8.Google Scholar
  6. Ariely, D., & Jones, S. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty: How we lie to everyone – especially ourselves (Vol. 336). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  7. Arnold, R., Martin, B. N., & Bigby, L. (2007). Is there a relationship between honor codes and academic dishonesty? Journal of College and Character, 8(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Bagraim, J., Goodman, S., & Pulker, S. (2014). Understanding dishonest academic behaviour amongst business students—The business leaders of the future. Industry and Higher Education, 28(5), 331–340.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301.Google Scholar
  10. Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.Google Scholar
  11. Broeckelman-Post, M. A. (2008). Faculty and student classroom influences on academic dishonesty. IEEE Transactions on Education, 51(2), 206–211.Google Scholar
  12. Camara, S. K., Eng-Ziskin, S., Wimberley, L., Dabbour, K. S., & Lee, C. M. (2017). Predicting students’ intention to plagiarize: An ethical theoretical framework. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(1), 43–58.Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, K. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2004). Academic dishonesty in a global educational market: A comparison of Hong Kong and American university business students. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(7), 425–435.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 236–249.Google Scholar
  15. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.Google Scholar
  16. Chudzicka-Czupała, A., Grabowski, D., Mello, A. L., Kuntz, J., Zaharia, D. V., Hapon, N., & Börü, D. (2016). Application of the theory of planned behaviour in academic cheating research–cross-cultural comparison. Ethics and Behaviour, 26(8), 638–659.Google Scholar
  17. Cochran, J. K. (2017). The effects of life domains, constraints, and motivations on academic dishonesty: A partial test and extension of Agnew’s general theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(11), 1288–1308.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.Google Scholar
  19. Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2016). Academic dishonesty or corrupt values: The case of Russia. In D. Torsello (Ed.), Corruption in Public Administration: An Ethnographic approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  20. Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2017). The challenges of academic integrity in higher education: Current trends and outlook. In CIHE Perspectives (Vol. 5). Boston: Boston College.Google Scholar
  21. Denisova-Schmidt, E., Huber, M., & Leontyeva, E. (2016). On the development of students’ attitudes towards corruption and cheating in Russian universities. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 128–143.Google Scholar
  22. Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642.Google Scholar
  23. Freiburger, T. L., Romain, D. M., Randol, B. M., & Marcum, C. D. (2017). Cheating behaviors among undergraduate college students: Results from a factorial survey. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 28(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
  24. Friedman, A., Blau, I., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2016). Cheating and feeling honest: Committing and punishing analog versus digital academic dishonesty behaviors in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of ELearning and Learning Objects, 12(1), 193–205.Google Scholar
  25. Froumin I., Platonova D. (2017) Higher education expansion in Brazil, Russia, India, and China. In J. Shin, P. Teixeira (Eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Giluk, T. L., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2015). Big five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 59–67.Google Scholar
  27. Golunov, S. (2013), ‘Malpractices in the Russian Higher Education System: Implications for EU-Russian Education and Science Cooperation’, CEURUS EU-Russia Papers, No. 9. Resource document. http://ceurus.ut.ee/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/EU-Russia-Papers-9_Golunov.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2017.
  28. Golunov, S. (2014). The elephant in the room: corruption and cheating in Russian universities (Vol. 132). Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Grimes, P. W. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: A cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
  30. Gurung, R. A. R., Wilhelm, T. M., & Filz, T. (2012). Optimizing honor codes for online exam administration. Ethics and Behavior, 22(2), 158–162.Google Scholar
  31. Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behaviour as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behaviour, 17(3), 255–279.Google Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320.Google Scholar
  33. Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 157–174.Google Scholar
  34. Hsiao, C. H. (2015). Impact of ethical and affective variables on cheating: Comparison of undergraduate students with and without jobs. Higher Education, 69(1), 55–77.Google Scholar
  35. Imran, A. M., & Nordin, M. S. (2013). Predicting the underlying factors of academic dishonesty among undergraduates in public universities: A path analysis approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(2), 103–120.Google Scholar
  36. Ives, B., Alama, M., Mosora, L. C., Mosora, M., Grosu-Radulescu, L., Clinciu, A. I., Cazan, A. M., Badescu, G., Tufis, C., Diaconu, M., & Dutu, A. (2017). Patterns and predictors of academic dishonesty in Romanian university students. Higher Education, 74(5), 815–831.Google Scholar
  37. Jeergal, P. A., Surekha, R., Sharma, P., Anila, K., Jeergal, V. A., & Rani, T. (2015). Prevalence, perception and attitude of dental students towards academic dishonesty and ways to overcome cheating behaviors. Journal of Advanced Clinical and Research Insights, 2, 2–6.Google Scholar
  38. Leonard, L. N., Riemenschneider, C. K., & Manly, T. S. (2017). Ethical behavioral intention in an academic setting: Models and predictors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 141–166.Google Scholar
  39. Lonsdale, D. (2017). Intentions to cheat: Ajzen's planned behavior and goal-related personality facets. The Journal of Psychology, 151(2), 113–129.Google Scholar
  40. Lupton, R. A., & Chaqman, K. J. (2002). Russian and American college students' attitudes, perceptions and tendencies towards cheating. Educational Research, 44(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
  41. Ma, Y., McCabe, D. L., & Liu, R. (2013). Students’ academic cheating in Chinese universities: Prevalence, influencing factors, and proposed action. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(3), 169–184.Google Scholar
  42. Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: An analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–135.Google Scholar
  43. Maloshonok, N. (2016). How perceptions of academic honesty at the university correlates with student engagement: Conceptualization and empirical research opportunities. Voprosy Obrazovaniya, 1, 35–60.Google Scholar
  44. Mardia, K. V. (1971). The effect of nonnormality on some multivariate tests and robustness to nonnormality in the linear model. Biometrika, 58(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
  45. Mayhew, M. J., Hubbard, S. M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to validate the theory of planned behaviour as a model for predicting student cheating. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 441–468.Google Scholar
  46. McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influence. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.Google Scholar
  47. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.Google Scholar
  48. McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Dishonesty in academic environments: The influence of peer reporting requirements. Journal of Higher Education, 72(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
  49. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.Google Scholar
  50. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.Google Scholar
  51. McCabe, D. L., Feghali, T., & Abdallah, H. (2008). Academic dishonesty in the Middle East: Individual and contextual factors. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 451–467.Google Scholar
  52. Megehee, C. M., & Spake, D. F. (2008). The impact of perceived peer behavior, probable detection and punishment severity on student cheating behavior. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 5–19.Google Scholar
  53. Meng, C. L., Othman, J., D’Silva, J. L., & Omar, Z. (2014). Ethical decision making in academic dishonesty with application of modified theory of planned behaviour: A review. International Education Studies, 7(3), 126–139.Google Scholar
  54. Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129–145.Google Scholar
  55. Murdock, T. B., Miller, A. D., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: Mediating and moderating processes. Social Psychology of Education, 10(2), 141–169.Google Scholar
  56. Muthén, B. (1989). Multiple-group structural modelling with non-normal continuous variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42(1), 55–62.Google Scholar
  57. Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.Google Scholar
  58. Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.Google Scholar
  59. Payan, J., Reardon, J., & McCorkle, D. E. (2010). The effect of culture on the academic honesty of marketing and business students. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(3), 275–291.Google Scholar
  60. Pratt, C. B., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1989). An analysis of predictors of college students’ ethical inclinations. Research in Higher Education, 30(2), 195–219.Google Scholar
  61. Radaev, V. V., & Chirikov, I. S. (2006). Otnoshenie studentov i prepodavatelej k nakazaniyam za plagiat i spisyvanie. Universitetskoe upravlenie praktika i analiz, 4, 77–82.Google Scholar
  62. Rajah-Kanagasabai, C. J., & Roberts, L. D. (2015). Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented theory of planned behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 535.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00535. Google Scholar
  63. Rettinger, D. A. (2017). The role of emotions and attitudes in causing and preventing cheating. Theory Into Practice, 56(2), 103–110.Google Scholar
  64. Rettinger, D. A., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50(3), 293–313.Google Scholar
  65. Roshchina, Ya. M., & Shmeleva, E. D. (2016) Prepodavateli i studenty vuzov obrazovatelnye i trudovye strategii v 2014 g. Informacionnyj byulleten Monitoring ehkonomiki obrazovaniya, 6(95), NRU HSE.Google Scholar
  66. Sierles, F., Hendrickx, I., & Circle, S. (1980). Cheating in medical school. Journal of Medical Education, 55, 124–125.Google Scholar
  67. Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
  68. Starovoytova, D., & Namango, S. (2016). Factors affecting cheating-behavior at undergraduate-engineering. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31), 66–82.Google Scholar
  69. Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 15(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
  70. Stone, T., Jawahar, I., & Kisamore, J. (2009). Using the theory of planned behaviour and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.Google Scholar
  71. Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behaviour using the theory of planned behaviour and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  72. Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., Jawahar, I. M., & Bolin, J. H. (2014). Making our measures match perceptions: Do severity and type matter when assessing academic misconduct offenses? Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(4), 251–270.Google Scholar
  73. Stuhmcke, A., Booth, T., & Wangmann, J. (2016). The illusory dichotomy of plagiarism. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 982–995.Google Scholar
  74. Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2009). Faculty and peer influences on academic integrity: College cheating in Romania. Higher Education, 57(3), 267–282.Google Scholar
  75. Van Montfort, K., Oud, J., & Satorra, A. (Eds.). (2004). Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (Vol. 19). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  76. Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.Google Scholar
  77. Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  78. Yang, S. C., Chiang, F. K., & Huang, C. L. (2017). A comparative study of academic dishonesty among university students in mainland China and Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
  79. Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., Sriram, R., Johnson, B. R., & Moore, B. (2016). What сcontributes to college students’ cheating? A study of individual factors. Ethics and Behavior, 27(5), 401–422.Google Scholar
  80. Zhang, Y., Yin, H., & Zheng, L. (2018). Investigating academic dishonesty among Chinese undergraduate students: Does gender matter? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 812–826.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sociology of Higher Education, The Institute of EducationNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations