Cross-Validation of the Reactions to Faculty Incivility Measurement through a Multidimensional Scaling Approach
- 158 Downloads
Incivility in the academic arena elicits a wide range of reactions: it interferes with learning, increases stress, feelings of disrespect and helplessness. Although reactions to incivility were mainly tested in workplaces, an extensive, robust framework to explain and measure responses to faculty incivility (FI) is yet to be offered. This study used Facet theory (FT) approach with a multidimensional scaling method of smallest space analysis (SSA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to confirm the theoretical structure of reactions to FI. A mapping sentence was constructed expressing the composite of three individual facets based on the theoretical framework: Facet A including four types of reactions (1)Exit (2) Voice (3) Loyalty and (4) Neglect (EVLN); Facet B reflecting the destructiveness – constructiveness dimension, and Facet C illustrating a dimension ranging from passive to active responses. Data were gathered by a scale measuring students’ reactions to FI. According to the findings, the CFA result presented four relatively interpretable factors (EVLN) while the SSA showed these factors as well as additional facets (B and C).
KeywordsFaculty incivility Facet theory, smallest space analysis, confirmatory factor analysis EVLN model Higher education
- Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of constructivist based academic learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18, 47–67.Google Scholar
- Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2015a). Assessing the connection between students' justice experience and perceptions of faculty incivility in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 121–134.Google Scholar
- Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2015b). Adjustment to college and perceptions of faculty incivility. Current Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s12144-015-9334-x.
- Amar, R., & Toledano, S. (2001). HUDAP manual. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
- Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–472.Google Scholar
- Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software, Inc..Google Scholar
- Berger, B. A. (2000). Incivility. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 64(4), 445–450.Google Scholar
- Berven, N. L., & Scofield, M. E. (1982). Nonmetric data-reduction techniques in rehabilitation research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 25, 297–311.Google Scholar
- Borg, I., & Shye, S. (1995). Facet theory: Form and content. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. M. (2007). Thoughts on incivility: Students and faculty perceptions of uncivil behavior in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(2), 93–97.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. M. (2008). Student voices on faculty incivility in nursing education: A conceptual model. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(5), 284–289.Google Scholar
- Clark, C. M., Farnsworth, J., & Landrum, R. E. (2009). Development and description of the incivility in nursing education (INE) survey. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 13(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
- Cohen, A. (2003). The identification of underlying dimensionality in social sciences: Differences between factor analysis and smallest space analysis. In S. Levy & D. Elizur (Eds.), Facet theory: Towards cumulative social science (pp. 61–72). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Center for Educational Development.Google Scholar
- Greenbaum, C. W. (2009). The past, present and future of facet theory and related approaches to data analysis in the social science. In D. Elizur & E. Yaniv (Eds.), Theory construction and multivariate analysis: Applications of facet approach (pp. 1–10). Israel: FTA Publications.Google Scholar
- Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Itzkovich, Y., & Alt, D. (2015). Development and validation of a measurement to assess college students’ reactions to faculty incivility. Ethics & Behavior, 26(8), -637.Google Scholar
- Knepp, K. A. F. (2012). Understanding student and faculty incivility in higher education. Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
- Lasiter, S., Marchiondo, L., & Marchiondo, K. (2012). Student narratives of faculty incivility. Nursing Outlook, 60(3), 121–126.Google Scholar
- Levy, S. (2005). Guttman, Louis. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (Vol. 2, pp. 175-188). Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
- Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-lingoes nonmetric program series. Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press.Google Scholar
- Maslovaty, N., & Levy, S. (2001). A comparative approach in developing a structural value theory. In D. Elizur (Ed.), Facet theory: Integrating theory construction with data analysis (pp. 21–32). Prague: Karlovy University of Prague.Google Scholar
- Morrissette, P. (2001). Reducing incivility in the university college classroom. Electronic International Journal of Leadership Learning, 5(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2012). Emotional and behavioral responses to workplace incivility and the impact of hierarchical status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01020.x.
- Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard Business Review, 91(1/2), 115–121.Google Scholar
- Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
- Schilpzand, P., de Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2015). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. doi: 10.1002/job.1976.
- Shirom, A. (1991). A facet-theoretic approach toward theorizing in labor relations. Paper presented at the third international facet theory conference, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
- Shye, S. (1997). Louis Guttman. Leading personalities in statistical sciences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar