Advertisement

Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 221–230 | Cite as

Creating a Self-Plagiarism Research Topic Typology through Bibliometric Visualisation

  • Peter Kokol
  • Jernej Završnik
  • Danica Železnik
  • Helena Blažun Vošner
Article

Abstract

Self-plagiarism, textual recycling and redundancy seemed to be controversial and unethical; however some questions about its definition are still open. The objective in this paper presented study was to use bibliometric analysis to synthesise and visualize the research literature production and derive a typology of self-plagiarism research. Five topics emerged: Self-plagiarism, Institutional self-plagiarism, Self-plagiarism and ICT, Self-plagiarism in academic writing, Self-plagiarism in science. The state of the art topics seem to be “social medium”, “virtual world”, “face book”, “sociomateriality”, “knowledge sharing”, “open access”, “institutional repository”, “retraction” and “responsible conduct”.

Keywords

Self – plagiarism Bibliometrics Bibliometric mapping Science landscapes 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2010). The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Andreescu, L. (2013). Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 775–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berquist, T. H. (2013). Self-plagiarism: a growing problem in biomedical publication. American Journal of Roentgenology, 200(2), 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruton, S. V., & Rachal, J. R. (2015). Education journal editors’ perspectives on self-plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, S. V. (2014). Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: legitimate forms of research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 21(3), 176–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callahan, J. L. (2014). Creation of a moral panic? Self-plagiarism in the academy. Human Resource Development Review, 13(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, C., & Booth, A. (2015). Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed? Research and Synthesis Methods, 6(2), 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chew, E., Ding, S. L., & Rowell, G. (2015). Changing attitudes in learning and assessment: cast-off ‘plagiarism detection’ and cast-on self-service assessment for learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunha, H. (1946). Gastrostomy. Its inception and evolution. The American Journal of Surgery, 72(4), 610–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. de Vasconcelos, S. M., & Roig, M. (2015). Prior publication and redundancy in contemporary science: are authors and editors at the crossroads? Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1367–1378. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9599-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dow, G. T. (2015). Do cheaters never prosper? The impact of examples, expertise, and cognitive load on cryptomnesia and inadvertent self-plagiarism of creative tasks. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of American Medical Association, 295(1), 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halupa, C. M. (2014). Exploring student self-plagiarism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2015). Student perceptions of self plagiarism: a multi-university exploratory study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van den Berg, J. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics in Information Technology, 13, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ison, D. C. (2015). The influence of the internet on plagiarism among doctoral dissertations: an empirical study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Juyal, D., Thawani, V., & Thaledi, S. (2015). Plagiarism: an egregious form of misconduct. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(2), 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, B. R. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 42(5), 1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maurer, H., Kappe, F., & Zaka, B. (2006). Plagiarism - a survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12(8), 1050–1084.Google Scholar
  21. Oberreuter, G., & Velásquez, J. D. (2013). Text mining applied to plagiarism detection: the use of words for detecting deviations in the writing style. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(9), 3756–3763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ozmercan, E. E. (2015). Determining the tendencies of academic dishonesty and senses of self-efficacy with discriminant analysis. Anthropologist, 20(1–2), 353–359.Google Scholar
  23. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography; an interim bibliography. SABS, 5, 184–244.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, S. R. (2014). Self-plagiarism and unfortunate publication: an essay on academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodrigues, M. E., & Rodrigues, A. M. (2012). Analyzing the performance of an institutional scientific repository – A case study. LIBER Quarterly, 22(2), 98–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roig, M. (2014). Journal editorials on plagiarism: what is the message? European Science Editing, 40(3), 58–59.Google Scholar
  27. Schultz, D. M., Rauber, R. M., & Heideman, K. F. (2015). AMS policy on plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Journal of Climate, 28(3), 909–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shen, J., Yao, L., Li, Y., Clarke, M., Wang, L., & Li, D. (2013). Visualizing the history of evidence-based medicine: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(10), 2157–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun, Y.-C. (2013). Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 264–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun, Y.-C., & Yang, F.-Y. (2015). Uncovering published authors’ text-borrowing practices: paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. US Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Academic self-plagiarism (Double dipping). Retrieved October 26, 2015, from http://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-15
  32. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2013). VOSviewer Manual. Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden.Google Scholar
  33. Young, F. W., & Hamer, R. M. (2013). Multidimensional scaling: history, theory, and applications. Florence: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Kokol
    • 1
  • Jernej Završnik
    • 2
  • Danica Železnik
    • 3
  • Helena Blažun Vošner
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Dr. Adolf Drolc Healthcare CenterMariborSlovenia
  3. 3.University College of Health Sciences Slovenj GradecSlovenj GradecSlovenia
  4. 4.Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for International CooperationUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations