Education Journal Editors’ Perspectives on Self-Plagiarism
- 541 Downloads
The perspectives of academic journal editors regarding self-plagiarism were examined by means of an online survey in which 277 editors of education journals participated. Following the survey, a sub-sample of 14 editors were interviewed. A substantial majority of editors were found to be in accord with the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the APA in believing that re-use of long, verbatim passages or tables, figures and images from an author’s previously published work without appropriate citation is unethical, and most editors viewed less egregious self-borrowing as wrong also. However, numerous editors expressed unease with the general concept of self-plagiarism, and several of them noted contextual factors that can make limited self-plagiarism acceptable. A clear majority indicated support for a common policy regarding self-plagiarism but had doubts about the feasibility of getting agreement on a comprehensive statement.
KeywordsSelf-plagiarism Plagiarism Editors Journals Research ethics
This research was supported in part by assistance from the College of Arts and Letters and the Vice President for Research at The University of Southern Mississippi. We also received assistance with data analysis from James T. Johnson.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with respect to this research.
- American Association of University Professors. (1989). Statement on plagiarism. Academe, 75(5), 47–48.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Bird, S. J. (2002). Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: what is the problem? Commentary on ‘Seven ways to plagiarize: handling real allegations of research misconduct.’ Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(4), 543–544.Google Scholar
- Bird, S. (2008). Self-plagiarism, recycling fraud, and the intent to mislead. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 4(2), 69–70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18570164, last accessed October 2014.
- Biros, M. H. (2012). Advice to authors: Getting published in academic emergency medicine. http://www.saem.org/publications/aem-journal/getting-published---advice, last accessed October 2014.
- Bonnell, D. A., Hafner, J. H., Hersam, M. C., Kotov, N. A, Buriak, J. M., Hammond, P. T., … Willson, C. G. (2012). Recycling is not always good: The dangers of self-plagiarism. ACS Nano, 6(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1021/nn3000912.
- Bretag, T., & Carapiet, S. (2007). A preliminary study to identify the extent of self-plagiarism in Australian academic research. Plagiary, 2, 92–103.Google Scholar
- Bruton, S. V. (2014). Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: Legitimate forms of research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 21(3), 176–197. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.848071.
- Chrousos, G. P., Kalantaridou, S. N., Margioris, A. N., & Gravanis, A. (2012). The “self-plagiarism” oxymoron: Can one steal from oneself? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 42(3), 231–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02645.x.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2013). Text recycling. In COPE Forum, March 12, 2013 (1–19). http://publicationethics.org/resources/discussion-documents, last accessed October 2014.
- Cronin, B. (2013a). Self-plagiarism: An odious oxymoron. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 873. doi: 10.1002/asi.22966.
- Dahlberg, J. (2007). ORI retains its working definition of plagiarism under new regulation. ORI Newsletter 15(4), 4, http://ori.hhs.gov/newsletters, last accessed October 2014.
- David, D. (2008). Scientists as Schrodinger’s cat: Reply to Roig’s the debate on self-plagiarism: Inquisitional science of high standards of scholarship? Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 8(2), 259–261.Google Scholar
- Dickens, B. M., Gruskin, S., & Tarantola, D. (2011). Avoiding plagiarism: The assurance of original publication. American Journal of Public Health, 101(6), 969. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300114.
- Green, S. P. (2002). Plagiarism, norms, and the limits of theft law: Some observations on the use of criminal sanctions in enforcing intellectual property rights. Hastings Law Journal, 54, 167–242.Google Scholar
- Haviland, C. P., & Mullin, J. A. (2009). Who owns this text?: Plagiarism, authorship, and disciplinary cultures. Logan: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2014). IEEE publication services and products board operations manual 2014. Piscataway: IEEE Publications.Google Scholar
- Jefferson, T. (1998). Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific misconduct or necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(2), 135–140.Google Scholar
- Karabag, S. F., & Berggren, C. (2012). Retraction, dishonesty and plagiarism: Analysis of a crucial issue for academic publishing, and the inadequate responses from leading journals in economics and management disciplines. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 2(3), 172–183.Google Scholar
- Loui, M. C. (2002). Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(4), 529–39, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12501721, last accessed Octer 2014.
- Riis, P. (2001). The concept of scientific dishonesty: Ethics, value systems, and research. In S. Lock, F. Wells, & M. Farthing (Eds.), Fraud and misconduct in biomedical research (3rd ed., pp. 3–12). London: BMJ Publishing.Google Scholar
- Roig, M. (2002). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing, http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf, last accessed October 2014.
- Roig, M. (2008). The debate on self-plagiarism: Inquisitional science or high standards of scholarship? Journal of Cognitive & Behavioral Psychotherapies, 8(2), 245–258.Google Scholar
- Roig, M. (2010). Plagiarism and self-plagiarism: What every author should know. Biochmia Medica, 20(3), 295–300.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, P. (2007). Song from myself: An anatomy of self plagiarism. Plagiary, 2, 57–66.Google Scholar
- Shashok, K. (2013). Plagiarism. In P. Smart, H. Maisonneuve, A. Plderman (Eds.), EASA science editors’ handbook (2nd ed., pp. 166–170). European Association of Science Editors.Google Scholar
- Steen, R. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 249–253.Google Scholar
- Strike, K. A., Anderson, M. S., Curren, R., van Geel, T., Pritchard, I., & Robertson, E. (2002). Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association: Cases and Commentary (pp. 75–90). Washington: American Educational Research Assocation.Google Scholar
- Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(6), 348–353. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
- Williams, P., & Wager, E. (2013). Exploring why and how journal editors retract articles: Findings from a qualitative study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0.
- Yank, V., & Barnes, D. (2003). Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: Cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(2), 109–114.Google Scholar