Creating an Interdisciplinary Business Ethics Program
Driven by recent accreditation mandates, a changing legal environment, and multiple high-visibility corporate ethics scandals, many business schools are responding to the growing movement within higher education to integrate ethics into the curricula. The literature suggests that the amount of attention given to ethics varies widely among institutions, and has not been coherently developed. Moreover, institutions have struggled to tie related projects and instruction to the overall concept of assurance of student learning. The purpose of this paper is to provide a framework for institutions interested in creating an interdisciplinary business ethics program that combines critical success factors, assurance of student learning and continuous quality improvement. Using a nationally recognized business school’s ethics program, we provide an example of how our model can be applied at other institutions based on their own unique vision, mission and goals.
KeywordsBusiness ethics Interdisciplinary learning Assessment Assurance of learning
- AACSB (2007). Assurance of learning standards: An interpretation. 2–16. www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/resources/white_papers/AACSB_Assurance_of_Learning.pdf Accessed 26 March, 2012.
- Bishop, T. R., Smith, P., & Cummings, B. (2009). The BELIEF initiative ethics handbook. Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
- Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics (2006). Shaping tomorrow’s business leaders, principles and practices for a model business program. Society for business ethics survey results, http://www.darden.virginia.edu/corporate-ethics/teaching_business_ethics_survey.htm Accessed 2 August, 2011.
- Business Wire (2005). Business schools respond to new global realities, according to survey by World Resources Institute and the Aspen Institute: Stanford University’s MBA program ranks #1 in beyond grey pinstripes. October 19, 2005. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Oct_19/ai_n15698735/ Accessed 26 March, 2012.
- Canales, R., Massey, C., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). Promises aren’t enough: business schools need to do a better job teaching students values. Wall Street Journal, August 23, 2010.Google Scholar
- Chonko, L. B. (1993). Business school education: some thoughts and recommendations. Marketing Education Review, 3(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) (2004). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washingon: COSEPUP, http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11153&page=3 Accessed 2 August, 2011.
- Ethics Education in Business Schools (2004). Report of the ethics education task force to AACSB international’s board of directors. http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/researchreports/archives/ethics-education.pdf Accessed 6 September, 2011.
- Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2009). Business ethics, ethical decision making and cases (7th ed.). Mason: South-Western, CENGAGE Learning.Google Scholar
- Fish, S. (2008). Save the world on your own time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Franklin, D. (2008). Just good business. The Economist. January 17, 2008.Google Scholar
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Series.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Goodpaster, K. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
- Illingworth, S. (2009). Ethics of interdisciplinarity. In B. Chandramohan & S. Fallows (Eds.), Interdisciplinary learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jackson, K. T. (2004). Building reputational capital: Strategies for integrity and fair play that improve the bottom line. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
- Karnani, A. (2010). The case against corporate social responsibility. Wall Street Journal, August 23, 2010.Google Scholar
- Mansilla, V. B., Miller, W. C., & Gardner, H. (2000). On disciplinary lenses and interdisciplinary work. In P. Grossman & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 17–38). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Newell, W. H. (1990). Interdisciplinary curriculum development. Issues in Integrative Studies, 8(1), 69–86.Google Scholar
- Peach, L. (1999). Fitness for practice . The UKCC Commission for Nursing and Midwifery Education. http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Archived%20Publications/UKCC%20Archived%20Publications/Fitness%20for%20Practice%20and%20Purpose%20The%20UKCC%20Commission%20for%20Nursing%20and%20Midwifery%20Education%20Report%20September%201999 Accessed 6 September, 2011.
- Pierre, E., & Oughton, J. (2007). The affective domain: undiscovered country. The College Quarterly, 10(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Prince, H. T., Tumlin, G. R., & Connaughton, S. L. (2009). An interdisciplinary major in ethical leadership studies: rationale, challenges, and template for building an adaptable program. International Leadership Journal, 2(1), 91–128.Google Scholar
- Roche, M. W. (2009). Should faculty members teach virtues and values? That is the wrong question. Liberal Education, 95(3), 32–37.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, P. (2011). The challenge of putting a grade on ethical learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
- Sikula, A. (1996). Applied management ethics Irwin, (p. 127).Google Scholar
- Soule, E. (2005). Embedding ethics in business and higher education, from leadership to management imperative. Washington DC: The Business Higher Education Forum.Google Scholar
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-business/ Accessed 6 September, 2011.
- Stefani, L. (2009). Assessment in interdisciplinary programs. In B. Chandramohan & S. Fallows (Eds.), Interdisciplinary learning and teaching in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Woo, C. Y. (2003). Personally responsible: the basis of an ethics education revolves around teaching business students a sense of individual responsibility. BizEd, 2(3), 22–27.Google Scholar