Advertisement

Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 27–44 | Cite as

Contract cheating: a new challenge for academic honesty?

  • Mary Walker
  • Cynthia Townley
Article

Abstract

‘Contract cheating’ has recently emerged as a form of academic dishonesty. It involves students contracting out their coursework to writers in order to submit the purchased assignments as their own work, usually via the internet. This form of cheating involves epistemic and ethical problems that are continuous with older forms of cheating, but which it also casts in a new form. It is a concern to educators because it is very difficult to detect, because it is arguably more fraudulent than some other forms of plagiarism, and because it appears to be connected to a range of systemic problems within modern higher education. This paper provides an overview of the information and literature thus far available on the topic, including its definition, the problems it involves, its causal factors, and the ways in which educators might respond. We argue that while contract cheating is a concern, some of the suggested responses are themselves problematic, and that best practice responses to the issue should avoid moral panic and remain focussed on supporting honest students and good academic practice.

Keywords

Ethics Academic honesty Plagiarism Contract cheating 

References

  1. Abilock, D. (2009). Guiding the gifted to honest work. Knowledge Quest, 37(3), 12–15.Google Scholar
  2. Bornstein, J. (2007). Fighting plagiarism with humor. Plagiary: Cross Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 2007, 104–109.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism: identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of the Second International Plagiarism Conference. United Kingdom, Gateshead.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2007a). Establishing a systematic six-stage process for detecting contract cheating. Pervasive Computing and Applications, 2007, 342–347.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2007b). Assessing contract cheating through auction sites—a computing perspective. HE Academy for Information and Computer Sciences <http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/events/8th-annual-conf/PapersThomas%20Lancaster%20final.pdf>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  6. Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2009). Contract cheating in UK higher education: promoting a proactive approach. HE Academy for Information and Computer Sciences (presentation powerpoint) <http://www.brookes.ac.uk/aske/documentsPlagiarism09_LancasterClarke.pdf>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  7. Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232.Google Scholar
  8. “The cybercheats making a small fortune”. (2006). Mail Online, 17 June 2006. <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-391085The-cybercheats-making-small-fortune.html>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  9. Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin(R): the student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
  10. Dante, E. (2010a). The shadow scholar. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 12 2010. <http://chronicle.com/article/The-Shadow-Scholar/125329/>, accessed 15 August 2011.
  11. Dante, E. (2010b). Live chat with an academic mercenary. The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 12 2010. <http://chronicle.com/articleLive-Chat-With-an-Academic/125342/>, accessed 15 August 2011.
  12. Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edgren, S., & Walters, S. (2006). Academic Dishonesty in the 21st Century. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 54(2), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faucher, D., & Caves, S. (2009). Academic dishonesty: innovative cheating techniques and the detenction and prevention of them. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4, 37–41.Google Scholar
  15. Gallant, T. (2008). Revisiting the past: the historical context of academic integrity. Academic Integrity in the 21st Century: ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(5). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  16. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halford, R. (2007). “Is it ethical and legal to buy a custom written or pre-written essay?”. Articlesbase June 20 2007, <http://www.articlesbase.com/college-and-university-articles/is-it-ethical-and-legal-to-buy-a-custom-written-or-prewritten-essay-167868.html>, accessed 24 August 2011.
  18. Hayes, N., & Introna, L. (2005). Systems for the Production of Plagiarists? The implications arising from the use of plagiarism detection systems in UK universities for Asian learners. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard, R. M. (2001). Don’t police plagiarism: just teach!. The Chronicle of Higher Education, November 18 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, T., & Helmore, S. (2006). Coursework for cash: the threat from on-line plagiarism. Higher Education Academy Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference for Information and Computer Science (August 2006): 121–126.Google Scholar
  21. Konheim-Kalkstein, Y. L., Stellmack, M. A., & Shilkey, M. L. (2008). Comparison of honor code and non-honor code classrooms at a non-honor code university. Journal of College and Character, 9(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  22. Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2008). The phenomena of contract cheating. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Student plagiarism in an online world: Problems and solutions. Hershey: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  23. Levinson, H. (2005). Internet essays prove poor buys. BBC News, 7 April 2005. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4420845.stm>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  24. Lofstrom, E. (2011). “Does plagiarism mean anything? LOL.” Students’ conceptions of writing and cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232.Google Scholar
  25. Mahmood, Z. (2009). Contract cheating: a new phenomenon in cyber-plagiarism. Communications of the IBIMA, 10, 93–97.Google Scholar
  26. Malgwi, C. A., & Rakovski, C. C. (2009). Combating academic fraud: are students reticent about uncovering the covert? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mamatas, N. (2008). “The Term Paper Artist: The lucrative industry behind higher ed’s failings”. The Smart Set, <http://www.thesmartset.com/article/article10100801.aspx>, accessed 16 August 2011.
  28. McCabe, D. (2001). Cheating: why students do it and how we can help them stop. American Educator Winter 2001.Google Scholar
  29. McCabe, D. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: a North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1). <http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/viewFile/14/9>, accessed 12 October 2011.
  30. McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college: longitudinal trends and recent developments. Change, 28(1), 28–33.Google Scholar
  32. McCabe, D., Trevino, L. K., & Buttfield, K. D. (2004). Academic integrity: How widespread are cheating and plagiarism? In T. Allena & D. R. Karp (Eds.), Restorative justice on the college campus: Promoting student growth, and responsibility, and reawakening the spirit of campus community (pp. 130–141). Springfield: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  33. Online Etymology Dictionary. (2011). <http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=plagiarism&searchmode=none>, accessed 14 October 2011.
  34. Oppenheim, C. (2005). Why I… believe students who buy essays via the web get poor value for money. Times Higher Education, 8 April 2005. <http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=195226&sectioncode=26>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  35. Page, J. S. (2004). Cyber-pseudepigraphy: a new challenge for higher education policy and management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(3), 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perry, M. (2011). NYU Prof vows never to probe cheating again—and faces a backlash. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 July 2011. <http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampusnyu-prof-vows-never-to-probe-cheating-again%E2%80%94and-faces-a-backlash/32351>, accessed 15 August 2011.
  37. Ritter, K. (2006). Buying in, selling short: a pedagogy against the rhetoric of online paper mills. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 6(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 173–220). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Shepherd, J. (2008). History essay in the making. The Guardian, May 6 2008. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/may/06/highereducation.students>, accessed 15 August 2011.
  40. Shepherd, J., & Tobin, L. (2007). Their dark materials. The Guardian, 3 April 2007. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/apr/03/highereducation.students>, accessed 17 August 2011.
  41. Sigthorsson, G. (2005). Copy/Paste: the joys of plagiarism. M/C Journal: A journal of media and culture, 8(3), <http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0507/04-sigthorsson.php>, accessed 30 August 2011.
  42. Sisti, D. (2007). How do high school students justify internet plagiarism? Ethics and Behaviour, 17(3), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevenson, S. (2001). “Adventures in Cheating: A guide to buying term papers online”. Slate <http://www.slate.com/id/2059540/>, accessed 16 August 2011.
  44. Time Magazine. “Education: Term Paper Hustlers”. (1971). Time Magazine U.S. April 19 1971. <http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,905050-2,00.html>, accessed 14 October 2011.
  45. Townley, C., & Parsell, M. (2004). Technology and academic virtue: student plagiarism through the looking glass. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(4), 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Witherspoon, A. (1995). This pen for hire: on grinding out papers for college students. Harper’s Magazine, <http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16916045.html>, accessed 16 August 2011.
  47. Witte, A. S. (2008). Speeding is okay and cheating is cool. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council 2008 (Fall/Winter): 29–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations