Journal of Academic Ethics

, 9:291 | Cite as

Turning a Blind Eye: Faculty Who Ignore Student Cheating

  • Arthur CorenEmail author


In this study, 40.3% of faculty members admitted to ignoring student cheating on one or more occasions. The quality of past experience in dealing with academic integrity violations was examined. Faculty members with previous bad experiences were more likely to prefer dealing with cheating by ignoring it. The data were further analysed to determine beliefs and attitudes that distinguish between faculty who have never ignored an instance of cheating and those who indicated that they have ignored one or more instances in the past. The stated reasons for ignoring cheating included insufficient evidence, triviality of the offense, and insufficient time; however, it was demonstrated that faculty who ignored academic integrity violations felt more stressed when speaking to students about cheating, preferred to avoid emotionally charged situations, and indicated that if a student were likely to become emotional, they were less likely to speak to him or her.


Academic integrity Cheating Plagiarism Faculty-student interaction Academic ethics 


  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldridge, A., & Levine, K. (2001). Surveying the social world: Principles and practice in survey research. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, R., & Cox, A. L. (2005). At least they’re learning something: the hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg, E. (2002, July). Northumbria University lecturers’ experiences of plagiarism and collusion. Paper presented at the First Northumbria Conference—Educating for the Future, Newcastle on Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  8. Dordoy, A. (2002, July). Cheating and plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions at Northumbria. Paper presented at the First Northumbria Conference—Educating for the Future, Newcastle on Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Greene, A. S., & Saxe, L. (1992). Everyone (else) does it: Academic cheating. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association Convention, Boston, MA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347931)Google Scholar
  10. Hibbert, C. (1998). Nelson: A personal history. Toronto: HarperCollins Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics and Behavior, 8(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mainka, C., & Raeburn, S. (2006). Investigating staff perceptions of academic misconduct: First results in one school. Paper presented at the Second International Plagiarism Conference, The Sage Gateshead, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Mangione, T. W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. McCabe, D. L. (2004a). Academic integrity: Rutgers University faculty survey. Retrieved from http://integrity.rutgersedu/rutgersfac.asp
  15. McCabe, D. L. (2004b, October 9–11) Student cheating: Crisis or opportunity? Paper presented at the Center for Academic Integrity Conference, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.Google Scholar
  16. Meyer, G. D., & Bloemer, H. (2006). Plagiarism in the department of mechanical engineering in the Russ College of Engineering at Ohio University. Retrieved from
  17. Rettinger, D. A., Jordan, A. E., & Peschiera, F. (2004). Evaluating the motivation of other students to cheat: a vignette experiment. Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherman, A. J. (2005). Schools for scandal. New England Review, 26(3), 82–91.Google Scholar
  19. Southey, R. (1908). The life of Horatio Lord Nelson. Retrieved from
  20. Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 5(2), 129–142.Google Scholar
  21. Tabachnick, B. G., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Pope, K. S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: beliefs and behaviours of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist, 46(5), 506–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Volpe, R., Davidson, L., & Bell, M. C. (2008). Faculty attitudes and behaviors concerning student cheating. College Student Journal, 42(1), 164–175.Google Scholar
  23. Wasley, P. (2006, August 11). The plagiarism hunter. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessKwantlen Polytechnic UniversitySurreyCanada

Personalised recommendations