Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 19–31 | Cite as

Faculty Selling Desk Copies—The Textbook Industry, the Law and the Ethics

Article

Abstract

It is a guilty secret that many college professors sell the complimentary desk copies that they receive from textbook publishers for cash. This article attempts to shed light on the undercover practice by looking at the resale of complimentary textbooks by faculty from four perspectives. Part One provides an overview of the college textbook industry, the business reasons that motivate publishers to provide complimentary desk copies to faculty, and the economic consequences of the entry of the textbooks into the used book market. Part Two examines the legal characteristics of complimentary desk copies in terms of their ownership and any contractual duties that may arise from their receipt. Part Three looks at legislative efforts to curb the practice, and Part Four reviews university policies addressing the issue. In Part Five, the ethical implications of faculty selling desk copies are examined, with a special focus on this practice in a business school. The Conclusion considers the future of the sale of complimentary copies in light of the move to e-books and other initiatives by authors and textbook publishers to circumvent the practice.

Keywords

Complimentary textbooks Desk copies Academic ethics Faculty e-books 

References

  1. AACSB. (2010, January 31). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/AAACSB-STANDARDS-2010.pdf
  2. Anderson, R. A., Twomey, D. P., & Fox, I. (2003, July 21). Anderson’s Business Law and the Regulatory Environment Author Update. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from http://www.swlearning.com/blaw/anderson/anderson_case14e/updates_ch08.html
  3. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15–1891. (2008).Google Scholar
  4. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance (2007). Turn the page: Making college texbooks more affordable [report]. Retrieved from U.S. Department of Education: http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/turnthepage.pdf
  5. Association of American Publishers, Inc. (2006, September 15). The higher education textbook market. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/txtbkpres/hochheisersup.pdf
  6. Bagley, C. E., & Savage, D. W. (2010). Managers and the legal environment. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, T. (2003, June 27). Selling out: A textbook example. Retrieved August 21, 2010, from The Chronicle of Higher Education: http://chronicle.com/article/Selling-Out-a-Textbook-Exa/25422/
  8. Bronstad, A. (2008, September 22). Are e-books the future of legal casebooks? National Law Journal.Google Scholar
  9. Cal. Ed. Code § 66406.7. (2008).Google Scholar
  10. Carbaugh, R., & Ghosh, K. (2005). Are college texbooks priced fairly? Challenge, 95–112.Google Scholar
  11. Cheeseman, H. R. (2009). Contemporary business and online commerce law. Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. echapters. (n.d.). Retrieved October 19, 2008, from http://www.ichapters.com/market/index.html
  13. Ennis, D. (2007, September 7). The Bookman Cometh. The Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. FacultyBooks.com. (n.d.). Retrieved August 21, 2010, from FacultyBooks.com: http://www.facultybooks.com/default.jsp?id=fbgoogle&gclid=CK2rq-Cby6MCFQNHnQodKib5uQ
  15. Fla. Stat.§ 1004.085. (2008).Google Scholar
  16. Foster, J. E., & Horowitz, A. W. (1996). Complimentary yours: Free examination copies and textbook prices. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 85–99.Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, G. A. (2009, July 23). Buyer’s E-Morse: “owning” digital books. Wall Street Journal, A11.Google Scholar
  18. Georgia State University (2007). Faculty handbook (Section 313.05). Retrieved from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwfhb/fhb.html
  19. Higher Education Opportunity Act, 20 USCS § 1015b. (2009).Google Scholar
  20. Hull, R. (2010). Stomp the comp. Retrieved August 22, 2010, from Text and Academic Authors Association: http://www.taaonline.net/media/stompcomp.html
  21. IMS Global Learning (2011). Retrieved February 19, 2011, from http://www.imsglobal.org/
  22. Job Advertisement, (2010, May 27). Senior campus book buyer [Online Forum Comment]. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from http://collegestation-texas.olx.com/senior-campus-book-buyer-iid-28337251
  23. Jones v. Ohio Dept. of Job and Family Services, 2007 Ohio 3275; 2007 Ohio App. Lexis 3032 (Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eight Appellate District June 28, 2007).Google Scholar
  24. Jones, J. B. (2010, January 21). ProfHacker. Retrieved August 27, 2010, from The Chronicle of Higher Education: http://chronicle.com/blogPost/Ethically-Disposing-of-Review/22920/
  25. Kamp, B. (1998). Complimentarily yours: Free examination copies and textbook prices: Comment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 527–533.Google Scholar
  26. Koch, J. (2006, September). Hearing before the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. Retrieved August 21, 2010, from United States Department of Education: http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/kochreport.pdf
  27. Kubasek, N. K.-M. (2009). Dynamic business law. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  28. Marklein, M. B. (2010, August 10). Learning curve goes digital; Colleges and universities across the country increasingly are embracing new learning technologies, but it is still far from clear when students will actually learn better—or even as well—using them. USA Today, p. D.1.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, L. L., Campbell, D., Hogan, E. A., & Gulledge, D. (1998). Business students’ perceptions of potential ethical dilemmas faced by faculty. Teaching Business Ethics, 235–251.Google Scholar
  30. Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. (2008). Systems Procedures. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from Minnesota State Colleges and Universities: http://www.mnscu.edu/board/procedure/1c0p1.html
  31. N.Y. Education Law § 724. (2008).Google Scholar
  32. National Association of College Stores. (2010). Higher education retail market facts and figures 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2010, from National Association of College Stores: http://www.nacs.org/Default.aspx?tabid=168
  33. Nelson, M. (2008, November 28). Is higher education ready to switch to digital course materials? Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A29.Google Scholar
  34. Okla.Stat.70 § 3241.2. (2008).Google Scholar
  35. Postal Reorganization Act, 39 USCS § 3900. (1971).Google Scholar
  36. Robie, C. (2005, May 20). What should faculty do about the prices students pay for texts? Message posted to https://email.rutgers.edu/pipermail/hrdiv_net/2005-May/001649.html
  37. Robie, C., Kidwell, J. R., & King, J. (2003). The ethics of professorial book selling: Morality, money and “black market” books. Journal of Business Ethics, 61–76.Google Scholar
  38. Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, (2008, July 24) Commercial and Charitable Solicitations Policy 60.1.9. Retrieved from: http://policies.rutgers.edu/PDF/Section60/60.1.9-current.pdf
  39. Rhodes College. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.rhodes.edu/collegehandbook/10351.asp
  40. Santa Fe Community College (2002, November) Use of college facilities rule 6.4. (Rules Manual). Retrieved August 23, 2010, from: http://dept.sfcollege.edu/rules/PDF/Rule_6/6_4.pdf
  41. Schroeder, P. (Testimony) (2006, September 19). Hearing before the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/txtbkpres/schroederpresnt.pdf
  42. Tabachnick, B. G., Keith-Spiege, P., & Pope, K. S. (1991). Ethics of teaching: Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. American Psychologist, 506–515.Google Scholar
  43. Text and Academic Authors Association (2008). Stomp the comp! Retrieved from http://taaonline.net/StomptheComp/stompcomp.pdf
  44. Va. Code Ann. § 23–4.3:1. (2008).Google Scholar
  45. W. Va. Code § 18B-10-14. (2008).Google Scholar
  46. Walston-Dunham, B. (2004). Introduction to law. Clifton park: Thomson Delmar Learning.*Google Scholar
  47. Warfel, H. R. (1941). Examination copies of textbooks. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professor, 587–589.Google Scholar
  48. Washington State Executive Ethics Board. (2007). Retrieved from Washington State Executive Ethics Board: http://www.ethics.wa.gov/opinions/opinion_03_04.htm
  49. Young, J. (2009, May 15). How a student-friendly kindle could change the textbook market. Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  50. Wash. Rev. Code. § 42.52 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance and Legal StudiesBloomsburg University of PennsylvaniaBloomsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations