Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 217–232 | Cite as

Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective

Article

Abstract

The study of academic plagiarism among university students is at an embryonic stage in Spain and in the other Spanish-speaking countries. This article reports the results of a research, carried out in a medium-sized Spanish university, based on a double method approach—quantitative and qualitative—concerning the factors associated with academic plagiarism from the students’ perspective. The main explanatory factors of the phenomenon, according to the results obtained, are: a) aspects and behaviour of students (bad time management, personal shortcomings when preparing assignments, the elevated number of assignments to be handed in, etc.); b) the opportunities conferred by information and communication technologies to locate, copy and paste information; and, finally, c) aspects related to professors-lecturers and/or the characteristics of the subject-course (lecturers who show no interest in their work, eminently theoretical subjects and assignments, etc.).

Keywords

Academic plagiarism Higher education University students Academic honesty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article was written in the framework of the Research project financed by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government (MCI), entitled “El ciberplagio entre el alumnado universitario”, with reference SEJ2006-10413. The authors are grateful to the MCI for the support received. Authors also want to thank Dr. Miguel Roig for his suggestions and style correction done on the document.

References

  1. Akbulut, Y., Şendağ, S., Birinci, G., Kiliçer, K., Şahim, M. C., & Odabaşi, H. F. (2008). Exploring the types and reasons of internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of the Internet Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS). Computers & Education, 51(1), 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam, L. S. (2004). Is plagiarism more prevalent in some form of assessment than others? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 48–57). Perth, 5–8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/alam.html . Accessed 12 September 2010.
  3. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: an analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 17–22.Google Scholar
  5. Benett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertram-Gallant, T. (2006). Reconsidering academic dishonesty: A critical examination of a complex organizational problem. Doctoral dissertation, University of San Diego, 2006.Google Scholar
  7. Bertram-Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the 21st Century: A teaching and learning imperative. ASHE Higher Education Report, 33(5).Google Scholar
  8. Bowers, W. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, S. (2006). Perceptions of mobile phones in college classrooms: ringing, cheating, and classroom policies. Communication Education, 55(3), 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrell, S., Malmstrom, F., & West, J. (2008). Peer effects in academic cheating. The Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 173–207.Google Scholar
  11. Comas, R. & Sureda, J. (2007). Ciber-Plagio Académico. Una aproximación al estado de los conocimientos, Revista TEXTOS de la CiberSociedad, 10. http://www.cibersociedad.net . Accessed 25 September 2010. (in Spanish).
  12. Comas, R. (2009). El ciberplagio entre el alumnado universitario. Doctoral dissertation (unpublished), University of the Balearic Islands–Spain. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  13. Comas, R. & Sureda, J. (2008). El ciberplagi acadèmic: esbrinant-ne les causes per tal d’enllestir les solucions. Digithum. 10. http://www.uoc.edu/digithum/10/dt/cat/comas_sureda.pdf . Accessed 12 September 2010. (in Catalan).
  14. Dawson, J. (2004). Plagiarism: What’s Really Going On?, in TL Forum (2004). Seeking Educational Excellence. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. 9 and 10 February. Perth, Australia: Murdoch University. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2004/dawson.html . Accessed 12 September 2010.
  15. Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dordoy, A. (2002). Cheating and plagiarism: student and staff perceptions at Northumbria, in Northumbria Conference. Educating for the Future. http://online.northumbria.ac.uk/LTA/media/docs/ConferencePublication2002/AD.doc . Accessed 12 September 2010.
  17. Fialkoff, F., & St. Lifer, E. (2002). Bringing order to an unruly web. Library Journal, Spring, 127(7), 2–5.Google Scholar
  18. Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Newstead, S. E. (1995). Undergraduate cheating: who does what and why? Studies in higher education, 20(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groark, M., Oblinger, D., & Choa, M. (2001). Term paper mills, anti-plagiarism tools, and academic integrity. Educause Review, 36(5), 40–48.Google Scholar
  20. Haines, V., Diekhoff, G., LaBeff, E., & Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Introna, L., Hayes, N., Blair, L. & Wood, E. (2003). Cultural attitudes towards plagiarism: Developing a better understanding of the needs of students from diverse cultural backgrounds relating to issues of plagiarism. Lancaster: Lancaster University. http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/images/bin/lancsplagiarismreport.pdf . Accessed 09 September 2010.
  22. James, R., McInnis, C. & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities: Ideas, strategies and resources for quality in assessment. Melbourne: University of Melbourne for the Australian Universities Teaching Committee, Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Centre for the Study of Higher Education. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning. Accessed 12 September 2010.
  23. Kember, D., & Kwan, K. P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koul, R., Clariana, R., Jitgarun, K., & Songsriwittaya, A. (2008). The influence of achievement goal orientation on plagiarism. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loviscky, G. (2000). Construct validity of a managerial defining issues test. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. Pennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: an analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenzie, J. (1998). The new plagiarism: seven antidotes to prevent highway robbery in an electronic age. Educational Technology Journal, 7(8), 1–11.Google Scholar
  29. Moreno-Ariza M., & Pérez-Ferra, M. (2009). Cómo motivar a aprender en la universidad: una estrategia fundamental contra el fracaso académico en los nuevos modelos educativos. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 51. http://www.rieoei.org/rie51a04.htm . Accessed 12 September 2010. (in Spanish).
  30. Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phillips, M., & Horton, V. (2000). Cybercheating: has morality evaporated in business education? The International Journal of Education Management, 14(4), 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rakovski, C., & Levy, E. (2007). Academic dishonesty: perceptions of business students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466–481.Google Scholar
  33. Rettinger, D., & Kramer, Y. (2009). Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education, 50, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rimer, S. (2003, September 3). A campus fad that’s being copied: internet plagiarism seems on the rise. The New York Times, p. B7.Google Scholar
  35. Rocha, O. (2009). Plagiarism by Turkish students: causes and solutions. Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 86–103.Google Scholar
  36. Scanlon, P. (2003). Student online plagiarism: how do we respond? College Teaching, 51, 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singhal, A. (1982). Factors in students’ dishonesty: what are institutions doing and not doing? NASPA Journal, 31, 92–101.Google Scholar
  38. Sterngold, A. (2004). Confronting plagiarism: how conventional teaching invites cyber-cheating. Change, 36(3), 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sunderland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the Internet, and student learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Sureda, J. & Comas, R. (2006): Internet como fuente de documentación académica entre estudiantes universitarios. Palma: Xarxa Segura IB / Fundación Universitat-Empresa de les Illes Balears. http://www.xarxasegura.net/descarga/Cerques%20a%20Internet-1.pdf . Accessed 12 September 2010. (in Spanish).
  41. Sureda, J., Comas, R. & Morey, M. (2009). Las causas del plagio academic entre el alumnado universitario español según el profesorado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50, 197–220. (in Spanish).Google Scholar
  42. Underwood, J., & Szabo, A. (2003). Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.Google Scholar
  44. Wotring, K. (2007). Generational differences among community college students in their evaluation of academic cheating. Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, Retrieved September 7, 2010 from ProQuest Digital Dissertations database.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied PedagogyBalearic Islands UniversityPalma de MallorcaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Applied PedagogyBalearic Islands UniversityPalma de MallorcaSpain

Personalised recommendations