Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 199–215 | Cite as

Authorship in Student-Faculty Collaborative Research: Perceptions of Current and Best Practices

Article

Abstract

Determining appropriate authorship recognition in student-faculty collaborative research is a complex task. In this quantitative study, responses from 1346 students and faculty in education and some social science disciplines at 36 research-intensive institutions in the United States were analyzed to provide a description of current and recommended practices for authorship in student-faculty collaborative research. The responses revealed practices and perceptions that are not aligned with ethical guidelines and a lack of consensus among respondents about appropriate practice. Faculty and student respondents agreed that students deserve more authorship recognition than they get in common practice but they did not agree on the appropriate authorship arrangement for several of the collaborative scenarios described in the study or on the relative value of various contributions to research projects. The misalignment with ethical codes and lack of consensus among the respondents is problematic because student-faculty collaborative research is common and authored publications are powerful indicators of research competency. With these detailed results, students and faculty can better anticipate areas where their perspectives are likely to differ and faculty can work to clarify ambiguous expectations.

Keywords

Authorship Order of authorship Student-faculty collaborative research Intellectual property 

References

  1. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association. (2000). Ethical standards of the american educational research association. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the american psychological association (2nd ed.). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  5. Apgar, D. H., & Congress, E. (2005). Authorship credit: a national study of social work educators’ beliefs. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Association for the Study of Higher Education. (2003). Principles of ethical conduct. Las Vegas: Author.Google Scholar
  7. Crespi, T. D. (1994). Student scholarship: in the best interests of the scholar. American Psychologist, 49(12), 1094–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 375–392.Google Scholar
  9. Fine, M. A., & Kurdek, L. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on student-faculty collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geelhoed, R. J., Phillips, J. C., Fischer, A. R., Shpungin, E., & Gong, Y. (2007). Authorship decision making: an empirical investigation. Ethics & Behavior, 17(2), 95–115.Google Scholar
  11. Goodyear, R. K., Crego, C. A., & Johnston, M. W. (1992). Ethical issues in the supervision of student research: a study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvard Medical School. (1996). Authorship guidelines. Boston: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Ilakovac, V., Fister, K., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2007). Reliability of disclosure forms of authors’ contributions. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176(1), 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitchener, K. S. (1984). Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: the foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist, 12(3), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitchener, K. S. (1992). Psychologist as teacher and mentor: affirming ethical values throughout the curriculum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(3), 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Hayes, S. (2006). The relational selves of female graduate students during academic mentoring: from dialogue to transformation. Mentoring & Tutoring, 14(4), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2008). Everyday ethics in research: translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(1), 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merton, R. K. (1973 [1942]). The normative structure in science. In R. K. Merton & N. W. Storer (Eds.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Netting, F. E., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (1997). Authorship and collaboration: preparing the next generation of social work scholars. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(3), 555–566.Google Scholar
  21. Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, T. D. (2006). Authorship ethics: issues and suggested guidelines for the helping professionals. Counseling and Values, 50, 208–216.Google Scholar
  22. Pope, K. S., & Vetter, V. A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: a national survey. American Psychologist, 47(3), 397–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robins, L., & Kanowski, P. (2008). PhD by publication: a student’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  24. Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Student-faculty collaborations: ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shapiro, D. W., Wenger, N. S., & Shapiro, M. F. (1994). The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(6), 438–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spiegel, D., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (1970). Assignment of publication credits: ethics and practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 25, 738–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winston, R. B. (1985). A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 515–518.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations