Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 33–58 | Cite as

Business Research, Self-fulfilling Prophecy, and the Inherent Responsibility of Scholars

  • Michael GoninEmail author


Business research and teaching institutions play an important role in shaping the way businesses perceive their relations to the broader society and its moral expectations. Hence, as ethical scandals recently arose in the business world, questions related to the civic responsibilities of business scholars and to the role business schools play in society have gained wider interest. In this article, I argue that these ethical shortcomings are at least partly resulting from the mainstream business model with its taken-for granted basic assumptions such as specialization or the value-neutrality of business research. Redefining the roles and civic responsibilities of business scholars for business practice implies therefore a thorough analysis of these assumptions if not their redefinition. The taken-for-grantedness of the mainstream business model is questioned by the transformation of the societal context in which business activities are embedded. Its value-neutrality in turn is challenged by self-fulfilling prophecy effects, which highlight the normative influence of business schools. In order to critically discuss some basic assumptions of mainstream business theory, I propose to draw parallels with the corporate citizenship concept and the stakeholder theory. Their integrated approach of the relation between business practice and the broader society provides interesting insights for the social reembedding of business research and teaching.


Academic citizenship Business ethics Business schools Corporate citizenship Philosophy of science Science-society interface Self-fulfilling prophecy Social responsibility Stakeholder theory 



The author wants to thank Guido Palazzo for his precious comments on earlier versions of the paper.


  1. Adler, N. J. (2006). The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 486–499.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J., Hartman, C., Klinger, S. & Chan, S. (2004). Executive Excess 2004. campaign contributions, outsourcing, unexpensed stock options and rising CEO Pay. (Washington: Institute for Policy Studies), Retrieved 2007-05-11 from
  3. Antonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261–295.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. (1976). Leadership, learning, and changing the status quo. Organizational Dynamics, 4(3), 29–43.Google Scholar
  5. Aron, R. (1959). Introduction. In M. Weber (Ed.) Le savant et le politique (pp. 9–57). Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  6. Aspen Institute (2002). Where will they lead? MBA student attitudes about business & society, Retrieved 2005-04-12 from
  7. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515.Google Scholar
  8. Barber, B. R. (2000). Can democracy survive globalization. Government and Opposition, 35(3), 275–301.Google Scholar
  9. Bazerman, M. H. (2005). Conducting influential research: The need for prescriptive implications. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 25–31.Google Scholar
  10. Béchard, J.-P., & Grégoire, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship education research revisited: The case of higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 22–43.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, Newbury Park CA, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Beck, U. (2005). How not to become a museum piece. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 335–343.Google Scholar
  14. Beck, U., & Lau, C. (2005). Second modernity as a research agenda: Theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 525–557.Google Scholar
  15. Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  16. Benefiel, M. (2005). Soul at work. spiritual leadership in organizations. New York: Seabury Books.Google Scholar
  17. Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.Google Scholar
  18. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (2005 [1932]). The modern corporation & private property (3rd ed.). London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Bindé , J. (Ed.) (2004). The future of values. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  20. Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.Google Scholar
  21. Blaug, M. (2001). No history of ideas, please, we’re economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blommestein, H. J. (2006). Why is ethics not part of modern economics and finance? A historical perspective. Finance & the Common Good/Bien Commun, 24, 54–64.Google Scholar
  23. Bonardi, J.-P., & Keim, G. D. (2005). Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 555–576.Google Scholar
  24. Born, R. (1999). Wissenschaftsethik – Erzeugung von und Umgang mit Wissen. In H. Reinalter (Ed.) Perspektiven der Ethik (pp. 230–244). Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.Google Scholar
  25. Boyce, G. (2006). The social relevance of ethics education in a global(ising) era: From individual dilemmas to systemic crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, doi:10.1016/
  26. Bridel, P. (1999). Homo oeconomicus: rerum cognoscere causas? ou du principe de rationalité comme instrument de connaissance en théorie économique. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 37(113), 149–167.Google Scholar
  27. Buchholz, R. A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2005). The spirit of entrepreneurship and the qualities of moral decision making: Toward a unifying framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(3), 307–315.Google Scholar
  28. Burawoy, M. (2005). 2004 American Sociological Association Presidential address: For public sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 56(2), 259–294.Google Scholar
  29. Callon, M. (1998). Introduction. In M. Callon (Ed.) The laws of the markets (pp. 1–57). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Carrithers, D. F., & Peterson, D. (2006). Conflicting views of markets and economic justice: Implications for students learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(4), 373–387.Google Scholar
  31. Carroll, A. B. (1987). In search of the moral manager. Business Horizons, 30(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  32. Castro, B. (1994). Business ethics: Knowing ourselves. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 181–190.Google Scholar
  33. Chandler, A. D., & Mazlish, B. (2005). Introduction. In A. D. Chandler, & B. Mazlish (Eds.) Leviathans. Multinational corporations and the new global history pp. 1–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Chewning, R. C. (1984). Can free enterprise survive ethical schizophrenia. Business Horizons, 27(2), 5–11.Google Scholar
  35. Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995). If GDP is up, why is America down? The Atlantic, 276(4), 59–78.Google Scholar
  36. Comte-Sponville, A. (2004). Le capitalisme est-il moral?. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  37. Conlin, M. (1999). Religion in the workplace. Business Week, 3653, 151–158.Google Scholar
  38. Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751–764.Google Scholar
  39. Coy, D., Fischer, M., & Gordon, T. (2001). Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 1–31.Google Scholar
  40. Crettaz von Roten, F., Hof, P., & Leresche, J.-P. (2003). Le public suisse face à la science et aux institutions: des relations à explorer. Swiss Political Science Review, 9(3), 97–111.Google Scholar
  41. Crettaz von Roten, F., & Leresche, J.-P. (2004). Science, technique et opinion publique en Suisse. In J.-P. Leresche (Ed.) Cahiers de l’Observatoire. Lausanne: Observatoire Science, Politique et Société.Google Scholar
  42. Crook, C. (2005). The good company. The Economist, 374(8410), 3–18.Google Scholar
  43. Cusin, F., & Benamouzig, D. (2004). Économie et Sociologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires Françaises.Google Scholar
  44. Darrow, J. (2006). How can I be expected to understand all this? A discussion around the role of business education in shaping business responsibility in the knowledge economy. In The Ashridge Best European MBA Essay Award (Ed.), The responsibilities of business in a knowledge economy (p no pages). Milano: EABIS.Google Scholar
  45. Demeulenaere, P. (2003). Homo Oeconomicus. Enquête sur la constitution d’un paradigme. Paris: Presses Universitaires Françaises.Google Scholar
  46. Dobbs, L. (2006). War on the middle class. How the government, big business, and special interest groups are waging war on the american dream and how to fight back. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  47. Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 157–169.Google Scholar
  48. Donaldson, L. (2005). For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 109–113.Google Scholar
  49. Donaldson, L., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
  50. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  51. Dubbink, W. (2004). The fragile structure of free-market society. The radical implications of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(1), 23–46.Google Scholar
  52. Dubin, R. (1976). Theory building in applied areas. In M. D. Dunette (Ed.) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 17–39). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  53. Englis, B. G., & Solomon, M. R. (1997). I am not… therefore I am: The role of avoidance products in shaping consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 61–63.Google Scholar
  54. Etzioni, A. (1991). Socio-economics. The next steps. In A. Etzioni, & P. R. Lawrence (Eds.) Socio-economics. toward a new synthesis (pp. 347–352). Armonk NY and London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  55. Etzioni, A. (2003). Toward a new socio-economic paradigm. Socio-Economic Review, 1, 105–134.Google Scholar
  56. Etzioni, A. (2005). Bookmarks for public sociologists. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 373–378.Google Scholar
  57. Fallis, G. (2004). The Mission of the University. Toronto: York University, Department of Economics and Division of Social Science, Retrieved 2007-05-11 from
  58. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.Google Scholar
  59. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.Google Scholar
  60. Feyerabend, P. (1987). Farewell to reason. New York & London: Verso.Google Scholar
  61. Firat, A. F. (1999). Rethinking consumption. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 3(4), 283–295.Google Scholar
  62. Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 737–750.Google Scholar
  63. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. J. G. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.Google Scholar
  65. Ford, E. W., Duncan, J., Bedeian, A. G., Ginter, P. M., Rousculp, M. D., & Adams, A. M. (2003). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 46–60.Google Scholar
  66. Fournier, S. (2003). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.Google Scholar
  67. Frame, P., & Hartog, M. (2003). From rhetoric to reality. Into the swamp of ethical practice: implementing work-life balance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(4), 358–368.Google Scholar
  68. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.Google Scholar
  69. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “The corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.Google Scholar
  70. Frewer, L., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., & Berdal, K. G. (2004). Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42(7), 1181–1193.Google Scholar
  71. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. How the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In M. Friedman (Ed.) Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York times magazine, 1970-09-13, pp. 122–126.Google Scholar
  74. Fromm, E. (1977 [1942]). The fear of freedom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Garcia, M.-F. (1986). La construction sociale d’un marché parfait. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 65(1), 2–13.Google Scholar
  76. Garrett, D. E. (1987). The effectiveness of marketing policy boycotts: Environmental opposition to marketing. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 46–57.Google Scholar
  77. Généreux, J. (2001). Manifeste pour l’économie humaine. Esprit, 2001(7), 141–170.Google Scholar
  78. Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 309–320.Google Scholar
  79. Gergen, K. J. (2000). The saturated self. Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life (2nd ed.). (New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  80. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  81. Ghoshal, S., Bartlett, C. A., & Moran, P. (1999). A new manifesto for management. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 9–20.Google Scholar
  82. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.Google Scholar
  83. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  84. Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.) Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order (pp. 56–109). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  85. Gollust, S. E., & Jacobson, P. D. (2006). Privatization of public services: organizational reform efforts in public education and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(10), 1733–1739.Google Scholar
  86. Gonin, M. (2006). Die Trennung des Unternehmens vom Bürger – eine historisch-kritische Perspektive. In E. Patry, & P. Ulrich (Eds.) Marktwirtschaft als Teil einer bürgergesellschaftlichen Gesamtordnung (pp. 41–56). St. Gallen: Institut für Wirtschaftsethik der Universität St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  87. Goudzwaard, B., & De Lange, H. (1995). Beyond poverty and affluence. Toward an economy of care with a twelve-step program for economic recovery. Geneva: World Council of Churches Publications.Google Scholar
  88. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.Google Scholar
  89. Green Jr., S. E. (2004). A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 653–669.Google Scholar
  90. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Volume two: lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  91. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  92. Haimes, E., & Williams, R. (2007). Sociology, ethics, and the priority of the particular: Learning from a case study of genetic deliberations. British Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 457–476.Google Scholar
  93. Hayek, F. A. v. (1949 [1945]). Individualism: True and false. Individualism and Economic Order (pp. 1–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Hayek, F. A. v. (1984 [1983]). The origins and effects of our morals: A problem for science. In C. Nishiyama, & K. R. Leube (Eds.) The essence of Hayek (pp. 318–330). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  95. Herrnstein, R. J. (1993). Behavior, reinforcement, and utility. In M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds.) The origin of values (pp. 137–152). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  96. Hirshleifer, J. (1985). The expanding domain of economics. American Economic Review, 53(6), 53–68.Google Scholar
  97. Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.Google Scholar
  98. Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
  99. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.Google Scholar
  100. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  101. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
  102. Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 163–179.Google Scholar
  103. Karri, R., Caldwell, C., Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Neagle, D. (2005). Building trust in business schools through ethical governance. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3(2–4), 159–182.Google Scholar
  104. Klein, N. (2001). No logo: la tyrannie des marques: essai. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar
  105. Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., McKendall, M., & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating during the college years: How do business school students compare. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2), 197–206.Google Scholar
  106. Kliemt, H., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). A dialogue concerning the nature of rationality. In S. Huck (Ed.) Advances in understanding strategic behavior: Game theory, experiments and bounded rationality. Essays in honor of Werner Güth (pp. 105–119). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  107. Koehn, D. (2005). Transforming our students: Teaching business ethics post-Enron. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 137–151.Google Scholar
  108. Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 691–704.Google Scholar
  109. Krishnan, V. R. (2003). Do business schools change students’ values along desirable lines? A longitudinal study. In S. M. Natale, & A. F. Libertella (Eds.) Business education and training: A value-laden process, Vol. 8 (pp. 26–39). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  110. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflexions on my critics. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave (Eds.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 231–278). London, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Kuhn, T. S. (1972). La structure des révolutions scientifiques. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  112. Laszlo, E. (1972). The systems view of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  113. Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  114. Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 41–50.Google Scholar
  115. Lobel, S. A. (1991). Allocation of investment in work and family roles: Alternative theories and implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 507–521.Google Scholar
  116. Lopez, Y. P., Rechner, P. L., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2005). Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 341–358.Google Scholar
  117. Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Luhmann, N. (1984). Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft als autopoietisches System. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 13(4), 308–327.Google Scholar
  119. Lye, A., Shao, W., & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2005). Decision waves: Consumer decision in today’s complex world. European Journal of Marketing, 39(1/2), 216–230.Google Scholar
  120. Lyotard, J.-F. (1979). La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  121. Lyotard, J. F. (1986). Defining the postmodern, postmodernism (pp. 6–7). London: Institute of Contemporary Arts Publications.Google Scholar
  122. Maak, T. (2007). Responsible leadership, stakeholder engagement, and the emergence of social capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 329–343.Google Scholar
  123. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society – A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
  124. MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 107–145.Google Scholar
  125. Maffesoli, M. (2002). La transfiguration du politique. La tribalisation du monde postmoderne (3rd ed.). Paris: La Table Ronde.Google Scholar
  126. Maffesoli, M. (2004). Vers une éthique postmoderne de l’esthétique? In J. Bindé (Ed.) Où vont les valeurs? (pp. 119–124). Paris: UNESCO – Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  127. Manstetten, R. (2000). Das Menschenbild der Ökonomie. Der homo oeconomicus und die Anthropologie von Adam Smith. Freiburg & München: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  128. Maréchal, J.-P. (2001). Critique d’un lieu commun: l’économie comme science. Esprit, 2001(7), 129–140.Google Scholar
  129. Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3), 295–310.Google Scholar
  130. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.Google Scholar
  131. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66, 38–54.Google Scholar
  132. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–308.Google Scholar
  133. McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.Google Scholar
  134. McVea, J. F. (2007). Constructing good decisions in ethically charged situations: The role of dramatic rehearsal. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 375–390.Google Scholar
  135. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  136. Merton, R. K. (1959 [1947]). The machine, the worker and the engineer. In R. K. Merton (Ed.) Social theory and social structure (pp. 562–573). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  137. Merton, R. K. (1959 [1948]). The self-fulfilling prophecy. In R. K. Merton (Ed.) Social theory and social structure (pp. 421–436). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  138. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.Google Scholar
  139. Merton, R. K. (1973 [1938]). Science and the social order. In R. K. Merton, & N. W. Storer (Eds.) The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 254–266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  140. Merton, R. K. (1973 [1942]). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton, & N. W. Storer (Eds.) The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations pp. 267–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  141. Meyer-Faje , A., & Ulrich , P. (Eds.) (1991). Der andere Adam Smith. Beiträge zur Neubestimmung von Ökonomie als Politischer Ökonomie, Vol. 5.. Bern, Stuttgart, & Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
  142. Michael, M. L. (2006). Business ethics: The law of rules. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 475–504.Google Scholar
  143. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  144. Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs. A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. London et al.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  145. Mintzberg, H., Simons, R., & Basu, K. (2002). Beyond selfishness. Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 67–74.Google Scholar
  146. Mitroff, I. I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American Business Schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.Google Scholar
  147. Montgomery, C. A., Wernerfelt, B., & Balakrishnan, S. (1989). Strategy content and the research process: A critique and commentary. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 189–197.Google Scholar
  148. Morgan, G. (2001). Transnational communities and business system. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1(2), 113–130.Google Scholar
  149. Morton, D. (2006). Gunning for the world. Foreign Policy, 152, 58–67.Google Scholar
  150. Muniz Jr., A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432.Google Scholar
  151. Murphy, P. E., & Enderle, G. (1995). Managerial ethical leadership: Examples do matter. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 117–128.Google Scholar
  152. Myers, G. M., & Papageorgiou, Y. Y. (1991). Homo economicus in perspective. The Canadian Geographer, 35(4), 380–399.Google Scholar
  153. Myrdal, G. (1984). Implicit values in economics. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.) The philosophy of economics (pp. 250–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  154. Nussbaum, M. C. (2004). Beyond the social contract: Capabilities and global justice. An Olaf Palme Lecture, delivered in Oxford on 19 June 2003. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  155. Nussbaum , M. C., & Sen , A. (Eds.) (1993). The quality of life.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  156. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  157. Orlitzky, M., Swanson, D. L., & Quartermaine, L.-K. (2006). Normative myopia, executives’ personality, and preference for pay dispersion. Business and Society, 45(2), 149–177.Google Scholar
  158. Painter-Morland, M. (2006). Redefining accountability as relational responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 89–98.Google Scholar
  159. Palazzo, G. (2002). Die Mitte der Demokratie. Über die Theorie deliberativer Demokratie von Jürgen Habermas. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  160. Palazzo, G. (2005). Postnational constellations of innovativeness: A cosmopolitan approach. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
  161. Pareto, V. (1971 [1906]). Manual of political economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  162. Pels, D. (2003). Unhastening Science. Temporal demarcations in the ‘Social Triangle’. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 209–231.Google Scholar
  163. Peter, F. (2004). Choice, consent, and the legitimacy of market transactions. Economics and Philosophy, 20(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  164. Pfeffer, J. (2005). Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 96–100.Google Scholar
  165. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(1), 78–95.Google Scholar
  166. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2004). The business school ‘business’: Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501–1520.Google Scholar
  167. Plummer, J. T. (1984). How personality makes a difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(6), 27–31.Google Scholar
  168. Polanyi, K. (1957 [1944]). The great transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  169. Popper, K. R. (1978). La connaissance objective. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe.Google Scholar
  170. Popper, K. R. (1993 [1989]). Liberté et responsabilité intellectuelle. Discours prononcé à l’Université de St.-Gall. In K. R. Popper (Ed.) La leçon de ce siècle. Entretien avec Giancarlo Bosetti, suivi de deux essais de Karl Popper sur la liberté et l’État démocratique (pp. 127–146). Paris: Anatolia Editions.Google Scholar
  171. Popper, K. R. (2003 [1943]). The open society and its enemies. Volume 1: The spell of Plato. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  172. Popper, K. R. (2003 [1945]). The open society and its enemies: Volume 2: Hegel and Marx. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  173. Pruzan, P. (2001). The question of organizational consciousness: Can organizations have values, virtues and visions? Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 271–284.Google Scholar
  174. Rainelli-Le Montagner, H. (2006). Financial theory on ethics: the reasons for silence. Finance & The Common Good/Bien Commun, 24, 20–27.Google Scholar
  175. Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  176. Rees, R. (1985a). The theory of principal and agent: Part 1. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  177. Rees, R. (1985b). The theory of principal and agent: Part 2. Bulletin of Economic Research, 37(2), 75–95.Google Scholar
  178. Reiter, K. A. (2000). Harvard class of 2000 urged to pledge social responsibility. Harvard Crimson (March 20), retrieved 2007-04-25 from
  179. Rocha, H. O., & Ghoshal, S. (2006). Beyond self-interest revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 585–619.Google Scholar
  180. Rondinelli, D. A. (2002). Transnational corporations: International citizens or new sovereigns. Business and Society Review, 107(4), 391–413.Google Scholar
  181. Rosemann, N. (2005). The privatization of human rights violations – Business’ impunity or corporate responsibility? The case of human rights abuses and torture in Iraq. Non-State Actors and International Law, 5(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
  182. Rosenthal, S. B., & Buchholz, R. A. (2000). The empirical-normative split in business ethics: A pragmatic alternative. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), 399–408.Google Scholar
  183. Rousseau, D. M., & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 679–695.Google Scholar
  184. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility. Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.Google Scholar
  185. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors – Towards a new role of the TNC in the global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.Google Scholar
  186. Schwartz, B. (1993). On the creation and destruction of value. In M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds.) The origin of values (pp. 153–186). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  187. Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.Google Scholar
  188. Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum, & A. Sen (Eds.) The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  189. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  190. Sen, S., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: A social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 399–417.Google Scholar
  191. Seth, A., & Zinkhan, G. (1991). Strategy and the research process: A comment. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 75–82.Google Scholar
  192. Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sharp Paine, L. (1994). Managing for organizational integrity. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 106–117.Google Scholar
  194. Sharp Paine, L. (1996). Moral thinking in management. An essential capability. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(4), 477–492.Google Scholar
  195. Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256.Google Scholar
  196. Smith, A. (1981 [1776]). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  197. Smith, A. (1984 [1759]). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  198. Spain, J. W., Engle, A. D., & Thompson, J. C. (2005). Applying multiple pedagogical methodologies in an ethics awareness week: Expectations, events, evaluation, and enhancements. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
  199. Steenhaut, S., & van Kenhove, P. (2006). An empirical investigation of the relationships among a consumer’s personal values, ethical ideology and ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
  200. Stengers, I. (1993). L’invention des sciences modernes. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  201. Stigler, G. J. (1950a). The development of utility theory I. The Journal of Political Economy, 58, 307–327.Google Scholar
  202. Stigler, G. J. (1950b). The development of utility theory II. The Journal of Political Economy, 58, 373–396.Google Scholar
  203. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  204. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). The roaring nineties. Seeds of destruction. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  205. Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2003). The symbolic interactionist frame. In J. Delamater (Ed.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–28). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  206. Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 508–521.Google Scholar
  207. Tang, T. L.-P. (2007). Income and quality of life: Does the love of money make a difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 375–393.Google Scholar
  208. The Economist (2006). The heat is on. A special report on climate change. The Economist, 380(8494), S1–S24.Google Scholar
  209. Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Touraine, A. (1994). Qu’est-ce que la démocratie?. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  211. Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 113–128.Google Scholar
  212. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.Google Scholar
  213. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4 – Supplement), S251–S278.Google Scholar
  214. Ulrich, P. (1986). Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft. Fortschrittsperspektiven der modernen Industriegesellschaft. Bern, Stuttgart, & Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
  215. Ulrich, P. (2001). Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlicher Ökonomie. 3., revidierte Auflage edition. Bern, Stuttgart, & Wien: Haupt.Google Scholar
  216. Ulrich, P. (2006). Politische Ökonomie, wirtschaftsethisch rekonfiguriert. Funktionale Systemökonomie im Kontext praktischer Sozialökonomie. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 7(2), 164–182.Google Scholar
  217. Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2004). Enron, WorldCom, Andersen et al.: A challenge to modernity. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(6–7), 971–993.Google Scholar
  218. United Nations Global Compact (2007). The principles for responsible management education. New York: UN Global Compact.Google Scholar
  219. Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review, 110(2), 191–212.Google Scholar
  220. Van Parijs, P. (1995). Real freedom for all. What (if anything) can justify capitalism?. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  221. Vranceanu, R. (2005). The ethical dimension of economic choices. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(2), 94–107.Google Scholar
  222. Walsh, J., Weber, K., & Margolis, J. D. (2003). Social issues and management: Our lost cause found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881.Google Scholar
  223. Weber, M. (1959 [1917]). La vocation de savant. In M. Weber (Ed.) Le savant et le politique (pp. 59–107). Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  224. Weber, M. (1965 [1917]). Essai sur le sens de la « neutralité axiologique » dans les sciences sociologiques et économiques. In M. Weber (Ed.) Essais sur la théorie de la science (pp. 365–433). Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  225. Weber, M. (1992 [1904]). L’objectivité de la connaissance dans les sciences et la politique sociales. In M. Weber (Ed.) Essais sur la théorie de la science (pp. 117–201). Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  226. Weber, J. (2006). Implementing an organizational ethics program in an academic environment: the challenges and opportunities for the Duquesne University schools of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(1), 23–42.Google Scholar
  227. Weiss, T. (2006). New lessons in corporate citizenship, Forbes, Retrieved 2006-11-29 from
  228. Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 175–180.Google Scholar
  229. Whetstone, J. T. (2005). A framework for organizational virtue: the interrelationship of mission, culture and leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(4), 367–378.Google Scholar
  230. Wildavsky, A. (1993). On the social construction of distinctions: Risk, rape, public goods, and altruism. In M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds.) The origin of values (pp. 47–61). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  231. Williams, R. J., Barrett, J. D., & Brabston, M. (2000). Managers’ business school education and military service: Possible links to corporate criminal activity. Human Relations, 53(5), 691–712.Google Scholar
  232. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust organization. (New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  233. Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2001). Theorising business citizenship. In J. Andriof, & M. McIntosh (Eds.) Perspectives of corporate citizenship (pp. 83–103). Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  234. Woolf, P. K. (1991). Accountability and responsibility in research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(8), 595–600.Google Scholar
  235. Young, I. M. (2004). Responsibility and global labor justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12, 365–388.Google Scholar
  236. Yuengert, A. (2002). Why did the economist cross the road? The hierarchical logic of ethical and economic reasoning. Economics and Philosophy, 18(2), 329–349.Google Scholar
  237. Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2002). The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar Case. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 141–151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HECUniversity of LausanneLausanne-DorignySwitzerland

Personalised recommendations