Systems for the Production of Plagiarists? The Implications Arising from the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems in UK Universities for Asian Learners
- 398 Downloads
This paper argues that the inappropriate framing and implementation of plagiarism detection systems in UK universities can unwittingly construct international students as ‘plagiarists’. It argues that these systems are often implemented with inappropriate assumptions about plagiarism and the way in which new members of a community of practice develop the skills to become full members of that community. Drawing on the literature and some primary data it shows how expectations, norms and practices become translated and negotiated in such a way that legitimate attempts to conform with the expectations of the community of practice often become identified as plagiarism and illegitimate attempts at cheating often become obscured from view. It argues that this inappropriate framing and implementation of plagiarism detection systems may make academic integrity more illusive rather than less. It argues that in its current framing – as systems for ‘detection and discipline’ – plagiarism detection systems may become a new micro-politics of power with devastating consequences for those excluded.
Key Wordsalienation communities of practice discrimination international students plagiarism plagiarism detection systems
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Angelil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen Language? Plagiarism in Writing. UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (1994). Asian learners through western eyes: An astigmatic paradox, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Educational Research 2(2), 40–63.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. and Watkins, D. (1996). The Chinese Learner. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Bloch, J. and Chi, L. (1995). A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse. In D. Belcher and G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy, Northwood, New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 231–274. Google Scholar
- Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others' words: Using background reading text in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–230.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J. (2002). Suggestions For Teaching International Students More Effectively, Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, Oxford Brookes University http://www.brookesac.uk/services/ocsd.
- Carroll, J. and Appleton, J. (2001). Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide. JISC, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
- Dryden, L. (1999). A distant mirror or through the looking glass? Plagiarism and intellectual property in Japanese education. In L. Buranen and A. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World, Albany, New York: State University of New York, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
- Errey, L. (2002). Plagiarism: Something Fishy? …Or Just a Fish out of Water?, OCSLD.Google Scholar
- Harris, R.A. (2001). The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies For Preventing, Detecting, And Dealing With Plagiarism. Los Angeles, California: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
- Hayes, N. and Introna, L.D. (2003). Plagiarism and Alienation. Working Paper of Lancaster University Management School available at http://www.lums.co.uk/publications/abstract/239/.
- Howard, R. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento, Journal of Teaching Writing 11(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
- Hunt, R. (2003). Four Reasons to be Happy about Internet Plagiarism, St. Thomas University, Canada, accessed 5/1/2005.Google Scholar
- Introna, L.D., Hayes, N, Blair, L. and Wood, E. (2003). Cultural Attitudes towards Plagiarism. Report of the Lancaster University available at JISCPAS http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk.
- Introna, L.D. and Hayes, N. (2004). Plagiarism, Detection and Intentionality: On the (un)construction of plagiarists. Paper presented at Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policies, 28th June–30th June 2004, at St James' Park, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
- Lathrop, A. (2000). Student Cheating And Plagiarism In The Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- LoCastro, V. and Masuko, M. (2002). Plagiarism and academic writing of learners of English, Hermes Journal of Linguistics 28, 11–38.Google Scholar
- Moore, T. (1997). From test to note: Cultural variation in summarization practices, Prospect 12, 54–63.Google Scholar
- Myers, S. (1998). Questioning author(ity): ESL/EFL, science, and teaching about Plagiarism, Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 3(2). http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej10/a2.html.
- Ryan, J. (2000). A Guide to Teaching International Students. Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
- Schleimer, S., Wilkerson, D. and Aiken, A. (2003). Winnowing: Local Algorithms for Document Fingerprinting. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2003, 76–85.Google Scholar
- Thompson, D. (Ed.) (1995). The concise Oxford dictionary, 9th ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, Y. (2000). Chinese Students: Teaching, Learning and Equality in UK Higher Education, Higher Education Equal Opportunities Network. National Network Newsletter for Equal Opportunities Practitioners, Spring 2000, Issue 13, http://www.worc.ac.uk/services/equalopps/HEEON/newsonline.htm#Yvonne%27s).