Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 55–73 | Cite as

Systems for the Production of Plagiarists? The Implications Arising from the Use of Plagiarism Detection Systems in UK Universities for Asian Learners

Article

Abstract

This paper argues that the inappropriate framing and implementation of plagiarism detection systems in UK universities can unwittingly construct international students as ‘plagiarists’. It argues that these systems are often implemented with inappropriate assumptions about plagiarism and the way in which new members of a community of practice develop the skills to become full members of that community. Drawing on the literature and some primary data it shows how expectations, norms and practices become translated and negotiated in such a way that legitimate attempts to conform with the expectations of the community of practice often become identified as plagiarism and illegitimate attempts at cheating often become obscured from view. It argues that this inappropriate framing and implementation of plagiarism detection systems may make academic integrity more illusive rather than less. It argues that in its current framing – as systems for ‘detection and discipline’ – plagiarism detection systems may become a new micro-politics of power with devastating consequences for those excluded.

Key Words

alienation communities of practice discrimination international students plagiarism plagiarism detection systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen Language? Plagiarism in Writing. UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, J. (1994). Asian learners through western eyes: An astigmatic paradox, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Educational Research 2(2), 40–63.Google Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. and Watkins, D. (1996). The Chinese Learner. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, J. and Chi, L. (1995). A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse. In D. Belcher and G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language: Essays on Research and Pedagogy, Northwood, New Jersey: Ablex, pp. 231–274. Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others' words: Using background reading text in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–230.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. (2002). Suggestions For Teaching International Students More Effectively, Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, Oxford Brookes University http://www.brookesac.uk/services/ocsd.
  7. Carroll, J. and Appleton, J. (2001). Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide. JISC, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
  8. Deckert, G. (1993). Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong, Journal of Second Language Writing 2(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dryden, L. (1999). A distant mirror or through the looking glass? Plagiarism and intellectual property in Japanese education. In L. Buranen and A. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on Plagiarism and Intellectual Property in a Postmodern World, Albany, New York: State University of New York, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
  10. Errey, L. (2002). Plagiarism: Something Fishy? …Or Just a Fish out of Water?, OCSLD.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, R.A. (2001). The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies For Preventing, Detecting, And Dealing With Plagiarism. Los Angeles, California: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, N. and Introna, L.D. (2003). Plagiarism and Alienation. Working Paper of Lancaster University Management School available at http://www.lums.co.uk/publications/abstract/239/.
  13. Hayes, N. and Introna, L.D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning, Ethics and Behavior 15(3), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard, R. (1993). A plagiarism pentimento, Journal of Teaching Writing 11(2), 233–245.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, R. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty, College English 57(1), 788–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunt, R. (2003). Four Reasons to be Happy about Internet Plagiarism, St. Thomas University, Canada, accessed 5/1/2005.Google Scholar
  17. Introna, L.D., Hayes, N, Blair, L. and Wood, E. (2003). Cultural Attitudes towards Plagiarism. Report of the Lancaster University available at JISCPAS http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk.
  18. Introna, L.D. and Hayes, N. (2004). Plagiarism, Detection and Intentionality: On the (un)construction of plagiarists. Paper presented at Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policies, 28th June–30th June 2004, at St James' Park, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Kolich, A.M. (1983). Plagiarism: The worm of reason, College English 4, 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lathrop, A. (2000). Student Cheating And Plagiarism In The Internet Era: A Wake-Up Call. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  21. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Leki, I. and Carson, J. (1997). Completely different worlds: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses, TESOL Quarterly 31(1), 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LoCastro, V. and Masuko, M. (2002). Plagiarism and academic writing of learners of English, Hermes Journal of Linguistics 28, 11–38.Google Scholar
  24. Moeller, H. (2003). Before and after representation, Semiotica 143(1/4), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore, T. (1997). From test to note: Cultural variation in summarization practices, Prospect 12, 54–63.Google Scholar
  26. Myers, S. (1998). Questioning author(ity): ESL/EFL, science, and teaching about Plagiarism, Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 3(2). http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej10/a2.html.
  27. Orlikowski, W. and Gash, D. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations, ACM Transaction on Information Systems 12(2), 174–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism, TESOL Quarterly 30(2), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan, J. (2000). A Guide to Teaching International Students. Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
  30. Schleimer, S., Wilkerson, D. and Aiken, A. (2003). Winnowing: Local Algorithms for Document Fingerprinting. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2003, 76–85.Google Scholar
  31. Scollon, R. (1995) Plagiarism and ideology: Identity in intercultural discourse, Language in Society, 24, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherman, J. (1992). Your own thoughts in your own words, ELT Journal 46(2), 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shi, L. (2004). Textual borrowing in second-language writing, Written Communication 21(2), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, D. (Ed.) (1995). The concise Oxford dictionary, 9th ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, Y. (2000). Chinese Students: Teaching, Learning and Equality in UK Higher Education, Higher Education Equal Opportunities Network. National Network Newsletter for Equal Opportunities Practitioners, Spring 2000, Issue 13, http://www.worc.ac.uk/services/equalopps/HEEON/newsonline.htm#Yvonne%27s).

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Technology and OrganisationLancaster University Management School, Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations