Advertisement

Facing the Future: Generativity, Stagnation, Intended Legacies, and Well-Being in Later Life

  • Nicky J. NewtonEmail author
  • Preet K. Chauhan
  • Jessica L. Pates
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Older adults often contemplate the kind of legacy they would like to leave for subsequent generations. Research provides some evidence for relationships between expressions of intended legacies and generativity (caring for the next generation), and how generativity is related to well-being. The current study aims to expand the literature concerning the role of generativity and its counterpart, stagnation, in the likelihood and frequency of expressions of intended legacies (what individuals wish to leave behind when they die), and to parse each factor’s relationship to well-being among older women. Data were drawn from the combined 2014 data collections from the Radcliffe College Class of 1964 and the Women’s Life Paths Study (N = 204; Mage = 68.93). We used newly developed Q-sort measures of generativity and stagnation, and coded legacy from responses to open-ended questions. This study assessed three types of legacy: one that is meaningful in a personal way (personal), a contribution to the common good (broader), and a combination of personal and broader (composite). Although both generativity and stagnation showed some initial association with personal and total legacy, only stagnation was consistently negatively associated with the likelihood of expressing a legacy, frequency of legacy expression, and well-being. The contribution of psychosocial factors to legacy expression, and the utility of examining generativity and stagnation separately, is discussed.

Keywords

Legacy Generativity Stagnation Well-being Older women 

Notes

References

  1. Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults: Links to agency, communion, and subjective well-being. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50(1), 17–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071489.Google Scholar
  2. Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  3. Block, J. (2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, C. L. (1996). Generativity status measure. Interview and scoring manual. Unpublished manuscript, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, C. L., & Marcia, J. E. (1998). Generativity-stagnation: A five-category model. Journal of Personality, 66, 39–64.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.t01-2-00002.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, E. R., & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Meanings of political participation among Black and White women: Political identity and social responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 130–140.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.130.Google Scholar
  7. Cox, K. S., Wilt, J., Olson, B., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Generativity, the big five, and psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults. Journal of Personality, 78, 1185–1208.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00647.x.Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.Google Scholar
  9. Ekerdt, D. J., Luborsky, M., & Lysack, C. (2012). Safe passage of goods and self during residential relocation in later life. Ageing & Society, 32, 833–850.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000705.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, E. H. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  14. Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G. W. (2002). Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: The role of generativity, agency and communion, and narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 120–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000654.Google Scholar
  15. Hawley, G. A. (1988). Measures of psychosocial development. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Hunter, E. G. (2007–2008). Beyond death: Inheriting the past and giving to the future, transmitting the legacy of one’s self. Omega, 56, 313–329.  https://doi.org/10.2190/om.56.4.a.
  17. Hunter, E. G., & Rowles, G. D. (2005). Leaving a legacy: Toward a typology. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 327–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.08.002.Google Scholar
  18. Huta, V., & Zuroff, D. C. (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 14, 47–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9030-7.Google Scholar
  19. Jia, F., Soucie, K., Alisat, S., & Pratt, M. (2016). Sowing seeds for future generations: Development of generative concern and its relation to environmental narrative identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(5), 466–470.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415611260.Google Scholar
  20. Kane, R. A. (1996). From generation to generation: Thoughts on legacy. Generations, 20, 5–9.Google Scholar
  21. Kivnick, H. Q. (1996). Remembering and being remembered: The reciprocity of psychological legacy. Generations, 20, 49–53.Google Scholar
  22. Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125.Google Scholar
  24. MacDermid, S. M., Franz, C. E., & De Reus, L. A. (1998). Generativity: At the crossroads of social roles and personality. In D. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 181–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  25. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–122.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100.Google Scholar
  26. McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003.Google Scholar
  27. McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(22), 221–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221.Google Scholar
  28. Newton, N. J., & Jones, B. K. (2016). Passing on: Personal attributes associated with midlife expressions of intended legacies. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039905.Google Scholar
  29. Newton, N. J., & Stewart, A. J. (2011). Coding manual for legacy themes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  30. Newton, N. J., Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (under review). “Age is opportunity”: Women’s personality trajectories from mid- to later-life.Google Scholar
  31. Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson’s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1240–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1240.Google Scholar
  32. Peterson, B. E. (2002). Longitudinal analysis of midlife generativity, intergenerational roles, and caregiving. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 161–168.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.161.Google Scholar
  33. Peterson, B. E., & Klohnen, E. C. (1995). Realization of generativity in two samples of women at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.20.Google Scholar
  34. Peterson, B. E., Smirles, K. A., & Wentworth, P. A. (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1202–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1202.Google Scholar
  35. Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 11, 21–33.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.21.Google Scholar
  36. Rubinstein, R. L. (1996). Childlessness, legacy, and generativity. Generations, 20, 58–60.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and Personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stewart, A. J. (1978). A longitudinal study of coping styles in self-defining and socially defined women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 1079–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.1079.Google Scholar
  39. Stewart, A. J. (1980). Personality and situation in the prediction of women’s life patterns. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00956.x.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1993). The Radcliffe class of 1964: Career and family social clock projects in a transitional cohort. In K. D. Hulbert & D. T. Schuster (Eds.), Women’s lives through time: Educated American women of the twentieth century (pp. 235–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1998). The course of generativity. In D. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation, (pp. 75–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  42. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1999). “If I had it to do over again…”: Midlife review, midcourse corrections, and women’s well-being in midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 270–283.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.270.Google Scholar
  43. Tangri, S. S., & Jenkins, S. R. (1986). Stability and change in role innovation and life plans. Sex Roles, 14(11–12), 647–662.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287695.Google Scholar
  44. Van Hiel, A., Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2006). Stagnation and generativity: Structure, validity, and different relationships with adaptive and maladaptive personality. Journal of Personality, 74(2), 543–573.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00384.x.Google Scholar
  45. Vandewater, E. A., & Stewart, A. J. (1998). Making commitments, creating lives: Linking women’s roles and personality at midlife. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 717–738.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00187.x.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, B., Woodby, L., & Drentea, P. (2010). Ethical capital: ‘What’s a poor man got to leave?’. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(6), 880–897.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01246.x.Google Scholar
  47. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zacher, H., Schmitt, A., & Gielnik, M. M. (2012). Stepping into my shoes: Generativity as a mediator of the relationship between business owners’ age and family succession. Ageing & Society, 32, 673–696.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000547.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicky J. Newton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Preet K. Chauhan
    • 1
  • Jessica L. Pates
    • 1
  1. 1.Wilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations