Advertisement

Relational Competence in Emerging Adult Adoptees: Conceptualizing Competence in Close Relationships

  • Krystal K. CashenEmail author
  • Harold D. Grotevant
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Little research has focused on the positive adjustment of emerging adult adoptees (Palacios and Brodzinsky in Int J Behav Dev 34:270–284, 2010). Given the developmental context of emerging adulthood (Arnett in Am Psychol 55:469–482, 2000), it is important to select an indicator of adjustment that reflects the associated ambiguity. The present study aims to provide empirical support for the construct of relational competence, or competence in one’s closest relationship regardless of relationship type (i.e., romantic vs. nonromantic) among emerging adult adoptees. Participants included 162 adoptees who had been adopted before the age of one in the United States through private domestic adoption in to same-race families. Relational competence was measured by adapting a measure of romantic competence in emerging adulthood (Shulman et al. in J Adolesc 34:397–406, 2011). Indicators of relational competence were coded from interviews in which participants discussed their self-identified closest relationship (White et al. in J Personality Soc Psychol 50:152–162, 1986). Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the proposed model of relational competence was a good fit to the data and was invariant across relationship type and gender. No differences in relational competence scores were found by relationship type or by gender (all p’s > .552). Relational competence was positively associated with adaptive functioning (β = 0.325, p = .006) and negatively associated with internalizing (β = − 0.246, p = .035) and externalizing behavior (β = − 0.347, p = .003).

Keywords

Close relationships Friendships Romantic relationships Competence Adoption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the participants in this study and to Dr. David Scherer, Dr. Paula Pietromonaco, and the Rudd Adoption Research Lab for their consultation on this study.

Funding

Funding for the Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project has come from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD-028296, R01-HD-049859), National Science Foundation (BCS-0443590), the William T. Grant Foundation (7146), and the Rudd Family Foundation Chair in Psychology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA Adult Forms & Profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469.Google Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Atzil-Slonim, D., Reshef, M., Berman, E., Peri, T., & Shulman, S. (2016). Changes in romantic competence and career adaptability among emerging adults in psychotherapy. Emerging Adulthood, 4(5), 327–337.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815620964.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, A. B., Culatta, E., & Simons, R. L. (2013). Romantic relationships and health among African American young adults: Linking patterns of relationship quality over time to changes in physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54, 369–385.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513486652.Google Scholar
  6. Birditt, K. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (2007). Relationship quality profiles and well-being among married adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 595–604.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.595.Google Scholar
  7. Borders, L. D., Penny, J. M., & Portnoy, F. (2000). Adult adoptees and their friends: Current functioning and psychosocial well-being. Family Relations, 49(4), 407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00407.x.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61(4), 1101–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.ep9102040966.Google Scholar
  10. Claxton, S. E., & van Dulmen, M. H. M. (2013). Casual sexual relationships and experiences in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 138–150.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813487181.Google Scholar
  11. Collibee, C., & Furman, W. (2015). Quality counts: Developmental shifts in associations between romantic relationship qualities and psychosocial adjustment. Child Development, 86(5), 1639–1652.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12403.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, W. A., Hennighausen, K. C., Schmit, D. T., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Developmental precursors of romantic relationships: A longitudinal analysis. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1997(78), 69–84.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219977807.Google Scholar
  13. Danziger, S., & Ratner, D. (2010). Labor market outcomes and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 133–158.  https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0041.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, M. H., & Oathout, H. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational Competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.2.397.Google Scholar
  15. Engels, R. C. M. E., Finkenauer, C., Meeus, W., & Deković, M. (2001). Parental attachment and adolescents’ emotional adjustment: The associations with social skills and relational competence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 428–439.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.428.Google Scholar
  16. Erikson, E. H. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Feeney, J. A., Passmore, N. L., & Peterson, C. C. (2007). Adoption, attachment, and relationship concerns: A study of adult adoptees. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00145.x.Google Scholar
  18. Feiring, C. (1996). Concepts of romance in 15-year-old adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6(2), 181–200.Google Scholar
  19. Fleming, C. B., White, H. R., & Catalano, R. F. (2010). Romantic relationships and substance use in early adulthood: An examination of the influences of relationship type, partner substance use, and relationship quality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 153–167.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510368930.Google Scholar
  20. Fuhrman, R. W., Flannagan, D., & Matamoros, M. (2009). Behavior expectations in cross-sex friendships, same-sex friendships, and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 16, 575–595.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01240.x.Google Scholar
  21. Furman, W. (1999). Friends and lovers: The role of peer relationships in adolescent romantic relationships. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 133–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  22. Furman, W., & Collibee, C. (2014). A matter of timing: Developmental theories of romantic involvement and psychosocial adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000182.Google Scholar
  23. Furman, W., & Shomaker, L. B. (2008). Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: Distinct features and links to other close relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 31(6), 771–788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.10.007.Google Scholar
  24. Furman, W., Simon, V. A., Shaffer, L., & Bouchey, H. A. (2002). Adolescents’ working models and styles for relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Development, 73(1), 241–255.Google Scholar
  25. Furstenberg, F. F. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. Future of Children, 20(1), 67–87.  https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0038.Google Scholar
  26. Gaia, A. C. (2013). The role of gender stereotypes in the social acceptability of the expression of intimacy. The Social Science Journal, 50(4), 591–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2013.08.006.Google Scholar
  27. Green, E. G. T. (2006). Successful or friendly? Inferring achievement and relational competence from individualist and collectivist attitudes. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65(1), 25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.65.1.25.Google Scholar
  28. Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Grotevant, H. D., McRoy, R. G., Wrobel, G. M., & Ayers-Lopez, S. (2013). Contact between adoptive and birth families: Perspectives from the Minnesota Texas Adoption Research Project. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 193–198.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12039.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, H. D., Brady, E., McNair, R., Congdon, D., Niznik, J., & Anderson, S. (2007). Identity as a moderator of gender differences in the emotional closeness of emerging adults’ same- and cross-sex friendships. Adolescence, 42(165), 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, A. (1997). Issues relevant to therapy with adoptees. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 34(1), 64–68.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087821.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, J., & Place, P. (2017). Adoption by the numbers: A comprehensive report of U.S. adoption statistics. The National Council for Adoption. Retrieved October 17, 2017 from http://adoptioncouncil.org/files/large/249e5967173624.
  33. Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., … Peterson, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston & G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 20–67). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  34. L’Abate, L. (2012). A hierarchical framework for relational competence theory. In M. Cusinato & L. L’Abate (Eds.), Advances in relational competence theory: With special attention to alexithymia (pp. 13–48). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1998). Adult attachment scoring and classification system. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley; Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  36. McCormick, C. M., Kuo, S. I.-C., & Masten, A. S. (2011). Developmental tasks across the life span. In K. L. Fingerman, C. A. Berg, J. Smith & T. C. Antonucci (Eds.), Handbook of life-span development (pp. 117–139). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46.Google Scholar
  38. Ngu, L., & Florsheim, P. (2011). The development of relational competence among young high-risk fathers across the transition to parenthood. Family Process, 50(2), 184–203.Google Scholar
  39. Oudekerk, B. A., Allen, J. P., Hessel, E. T., & Molloy, L. E. (2015). The cascading development of autonomy and relatedness from adolescence to adulthood. Child Development, 86(2), 472–485.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12313.Google Scholar
  40. Palacios, J., & Brodzinsky, D. (2010). Adoption research: Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 270–284.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410362837.Google Scholar
  41. Roisman, G. I., Masten, A. S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004). Salient and emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood. Child Development, 75(1), 123–133.Google Scholar
  42. Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696812467330.Google Scholar
  43. Shulman, S., Davila, J., & Shachar-Shapira, L. (2011). Assessing romantic competence among older adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 34(3), 397–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.002.Google Scholar
  44. Tieman, W., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2006). Social functioning of young adult intercountry adoptees compared to nonadoptees. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 41(1), 68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-005-0995-x.Google Scholar
  45. van den Dries, L., Juffer, F., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2009). Fostering security? A meta-analysis of attachment in adopted children. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(3), 410–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.09.008.Google Scholar
  46. White, K. M., Speisman, J. C., Jackson, D., Bartis, S., & Costos, D. (1986). Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 152–162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations