Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 270–278 | Cite as

Happily Stressed: The Complexity of Well-Being in Midlife

  • Jeffrey Jensen Arnett


Previous studies provided mixed findings of well-being in midlife, so the present study sought to add new dimensions to this area of research by investigating diverse aspects of midlife well-being, including sources of enjoyment and stress. In a national sample of 834 Americans ages 40–60, overall well-being was high, and most participants agreed that their current time of life is “fun and exciting” (71%), a time of freedom (71%), and a time when “anything is possible” (77%). They also regarded themselves as being in a time of life for focusing on themselves (56%) and “finding out who I really am” (55%). However, 65% assessed this time of their lives as stressful (65%), and many agreed that they often feel anxious (39%), depressed (25%), or that “my life is not going well” (27%). Regression analyses revealed no notable variations in well-being by gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, work status, or relationship status. In sum, among Americans in midlife, well-being is generally high even as it coexists with stress and other mental health challenges.


Well-being Life satisfaction Midlife Middle adulthood Stress 



Funding for this research was provided by Clark University.


  1. Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumberg, S. J., & Luke, J. V. (2013). Wireless substitution: Early releaSE from National Health Interview Survey. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  4. Bouchard, G. (2014). The quality of the parenting alliance during the transition to parenthood. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 46(1), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brim, O. G., Ryff, C. D., & Kessler, R. C. (2004). How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, T. C., Powdthavee, N., & Oswald, A. J. (2015). Longitudinal evidence for a midlife nadir in human well-being: Results from four data-sets. The Economic Journal, 127(599), 126–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67(8), 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R. A. (2006). Life cycle happiness and its sources: Intersections of psychology, economics and demography. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freund, A. M., & Ritter, J. O. (2009). Midlife crisis: A debate. Gerontology, 55, 582–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frijters, P., & Beatton, T. (2012). The mystery of the U-shaped relation between happiness and age. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 82, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn, N. D. (2009). Is the apparent U-shape of well-being over the life course a result of inappropriate use of control variables? A commentary on Blanchflower and Oswald. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lachman, M. E., Teshale, S., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2015). Midlife as a pivotal period in the life course: Balancing growth and decline at the crossroads of youth and old age. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, L. O., Aldwin, C. M., Kubzansky, L. D., Chen, E., Mroczek, D. K., Wang, J. M., & Spiro, A. (2015). Do cherished children age successfully? Longitudinal findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 30, 894–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luthar, S. S., & Ciciolla, L. (2016). What it feels like to be a mother: Variations by children’s developmental stages. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (Eds.) (2014). Oxford handbook of identity development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, J., Robinson, O., & Thompson, T. (2015). Happiness and age in European adults: The moderating role of gross domestic product per capita. Psychology and Aging, 30, 544–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mroczek, D. K., & Kolanz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2014). The condition of education, 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from
  19. Pieterse, A. L., Todd, N. R., Neville, H. A., & Carter, R. T. (2012). Perceived racism and mental health among Black American adults: A meta-analytic review. Journal of CounSEling Psychology, 59(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104. Scholar
  21. Stone, A. A., & Mackie, C. (2013). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimension of experience. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of well-being in the United States. PNAS, 107, 9985–9990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutin, A. R., Terracciano, A., Milaneschi, Y., An, Y., Ferrucci, L., & Zonderman, A. B. (2013). The effect of birth cohort on well-being: The legacy of economic hard times. Psychological Science, 24(3), 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor, P., & Keeter, S. (2010). Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to change. Retrieved from
  25. United States Census Bureau (2012). State totals: Vintage 2012. Retrieved from
  26. Weiss, A., King, J. E., Inoue-Murayam, M., Matsuzama, T., & Oswald, A. J. (2012). Evidence for a midlife crisis in great apes consistent with the U-shape in human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 19949–19952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations