Advertisement

Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 58–76 | Cite as

A Review of Measures of Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development: Evidence for a General Factor

  • Curtis S. Dunkel
  • Colin Harbke
Article

Abstract

Recent research suggests that values on Erikson’s psychosocial stages covary to form a general factor of psychosocial development (GFPD). The purpose of the current investigation was to further test this possibility by conducting a meta-analysis on the association among the psychosocial stages. Sixty-two correlation matrices from 50 different samples (N = 20,326) were analyzed. Factor analyses supported the existence of a GFPD. Future research should explore the nature of the GFPD.

Keywords

Psychosocial development Erikson General factor of psychosocial development Meta-analysis 

References

  1. Adams, G. R. (2004–2006). Identity Development Among University Student’s Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. M. (1992). Psychosocial development as a predictor of marital satisfaction among Greek Orthodox in Oregon. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox College.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. (1993). The relationship between Marcia’s ego identity status paradigm and Erikson’s psychosocial theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University.Google Scholar
  4. Azar, J. A. (1983). An item, factor and Guttman analysis of an objective instrument designed to measure the constructs of Erikson’s epigenetic developmental theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS 6: Structural Equations Program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boling, A. (2005). Volunteer motivations across the lifespan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate University.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd, R. D., & Koskela, R. N. (1970). A test of Erikson’s theory of ego-stage development by means of a self-report instrument. The Journal of Experimental Education, 38, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caillet, K. C., & Michael, W. B. (1983). The construct validity of three self-report instruments hypothesized to measure the degree of resolution for each of the first six stage crises in Erikson’s developmental theory of personality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H. L., Israel, S., et al. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders? Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Caton, J. B. (1993). An application of Erik H. Erikson’s psychosocial theory to the borderline personality disorder. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, C. R., Chartrand, J. M., & Jowdy, D. P. (1995). Relationships between career indecision subtypes and ego identity development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 440–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darling-Fisher, C. S. (1987). The relationship between mothers’ and fathers’ Eriksonian psychosocial attributes, perceptions of family support, and adaptation to parenthood. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  15. DeAlmeida, S. C. (1992). Psychosocial development: An instrument construct validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  16. Domino, G., & Hannah, M. T. (1989). Effective functioning in the elderly: An application of Erikson’s theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 319–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunkel, C. S. (2013). Relative and longitudinal evidence for the importance of the General Factor of Psychosocial Development in predicting well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 118–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunkel, C. S., Kim, J. K., & Papini, D. R. (2012). The general factor of psychosocial development and its relation to the general factor of personality and life history strategy. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunkel, C. S., Mathes, E., & Harbke, C. (2011). Life history strategy, identity consolidation, and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunkel, C. S., & Sefcek, J. A. (2009). Eriksonian lifespan theory and life history theory: An integration using the example of identity formation. Review of General Psychology, 13, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunkel, C. S., & Van der Linden, D. (2014). Evidence for the general factor of personality as social-effectiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edmondson, B. M. (1998). The interrelationship of the Eriksonian psychosocial stages and the relationship of psychosocial stage attributes to ego identity development in late adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  23. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Faver, L. M. (1992). Psychosocial development, boundaries and intimacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  26. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51, 121–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer, J. L., Forthun, L. F., Pidcock, B. W., & Dowd, D. A. (2007). Parent relationships, emotion regulation, psychosocial maturity, and college student alcohol problems. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 912–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fisher, R. A. (1921). On the ‘probable error’ of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron, 1, 3–32.Google Scholar
  29. Freeman, D. M. (2001). The contribution of faith and ego strength to the prediction of GPA among high school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  30. Greevy, M. S. (1980). An Eriksonian measure of adjustment for an elderly population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.Google Scholar
  31. Haggbloom, S. J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J. E., Jones, V. K., Yarbough, G. L., Russell, T. M., et al. (2002). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of General Psychology, 6, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haight, M. G. (2006). Psychometric properties of Hawley’s measure of psychosocial development: A critical analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
  33. Hannah, M. T., Domino, G., Figueredo, A. J., & Hendrickson, R. (1996). The prediction of ego integrity in older persons. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 930–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawley, G. A. (1984). Construction and validation of an Eriksonian measure of psychosocial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Hawley, G. A. (1988). Measures of Psychosocial Development. Odessa: Florida, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huff, W. H. (1982). Ego stage development in the older adult learner attending Elderhostel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Huh, K. (1993). The impact of adolescent pregnancy and child bearing experiences on adolescent psychosocial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University.Google Scholar
  39. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iskowitz, G. (2000). Changing perspectives: Two complementary paths toward identity development in adolescent boys and girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Long Island University.Google Scholar
  41. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  42. Just, C. (2011). A review of the literature on the general factor of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 765–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ko, H. (1982). A correlational study of cognitive and affective developmental scales with academic and social achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Washington.Google Scholar
  44. Liu, E. A. (1995). The relationship of weight preoccupation and self-esteem to the psychosocial development in women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Loehlin, J. C. (2012). The general factor of personality: What lies beyond? Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Longano, D. M. (1990). Mother’s psychosocial development and parenting style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  47. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality a nd Social Psychology, 3(5), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marshall, S. (1997). Mattering to Others Questionnaire Validation. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  49. McAdams, D. P. (2006). The redemptive self: Generativity and the stories Americans live by. Research in Human Development, 3, 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McMaken, M. V. (2001). The relationship between Erikson’s developmental tasks and children identified as at-risk. Unpublished master’s thesis, Utah State University.Google Scholar
  52. Morrill, T. B. (2009). Cell phone use and psychosocial development among emerging adults. Unpublished dissertation, Utah State University.Google Scholar
  53. Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson’s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rasmussen, J. E. (1964). Relationship of ego identity to psychosocial effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 15, 815–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenthal, D. A., Gurney, R. M., & Moore, S. M. (1981). From trust to intimacy: A new inventory for examining Erikson’s stages of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10, 525–537.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality: Normal and abnormal. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Sargeant, M. F. (1987). The antecedents and implications of identity and intimacy development in middle and late adolescence: A cross-sectional study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  59. Schwartz, S. J. (2007). The structure of identity consolidation: Multiple correlated constructs or one superordinate construct? Identity, 7, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz, S., Dunkel, C. S., & Waterman, A. (2009). Terrorism: An identity theory perspective. Journal of Conflict and Terrorism Studies, 32, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, S. J., Forthun, L. F., Ravert, R. D., Zamboanga, B. L., Rodriguez, L., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., et al. (2010). The protective role of identity consolidation against health risk behaviors in college-attending emerging adults. American Journal of Health Behavior, 34, 214–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Sky, C. A. (1983). The relationship between attitudes toward time and psychosocial development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology.Google Scholar
  63. Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Subrahmanyam, K., Šmahel, D., & Greenfield, P. M. (2006). Connecting developmental processes to the Internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chatrooms. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thompson, S. L. (1991). The relationship between psychosocial development and divergent production in older adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
  66. Thornburg, K. R., Ispa, J. M., Adams, N. A., & Lee, B. S. (1992). Testing the simplex assumption underlying the Eriksonian Psychosocial Stage Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis and criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van der Linden, D., Tsaousis, I., & Petrides, K. V. (2012). Overlap between general factors of personality in the Big Five, Giant Three, and trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Waterman, A. S., & Whitbourne, S. K. (1981). The inventory of psychosocial development: A review and evaluation. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 11, 5.Google Scholar
  70. Whitbourne, S. K. (1977). IPD data for 1977. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  71. Whitbourne, S. K. (1989). IPD data for 1989. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
  72. Wieber, R. (1994). An empirical study of the relationship between Erikson’s developmental stages of the monk and monk’s insight into the complementarity of the rule of Benedict and the customs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Loyola College in Maryland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentWestern Illinois UniversityMacombUSA

Personalised recommendations