Sometimes a Bear is Just a Bear: No Evidence of Nonclinical Adult Toy Animal Ownership Indicating Emotion Dysregulation
- 192 Downloads
Although some studies of clinical populations suggest an association of adult toy animal ownership with personality disorder, studies of nonclinical populations have been lacking. In a nonclinical young adult sample (N = 148), we found no association of toy animal ownership with use of immature, mature, or neurotic defense mechanisms; avoidant or anxious attachment style; trait conscientiousness; heart rate variability (an index of self-regulatory strength); or social desirability responding. The results do not provide evidence for an association of adult nonclinical toy animal ownership with psychological or psychophysiological indices of immaturity, conscientiousness, insecure attachment, or lack of self-regulatory strength.
KeywordsToy animals Attachment Conscientiousness Heart rate variability Defense mechanisms
- Brody, S., & Carson, C. M. (2012). Brief report: Self-harm is associated with immature defense mechanisms but not substance use in a nonclinical Scottish adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.09.001.
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.Google Scholar
- Tassinary, L. G., Hess, U., & Carcoba, L. M. (2012). Peripheral physiological measures of psychological constructs. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 461–488). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Travelodge UK. (2010). Over a third of British adults still sleep with a teddy bear Retrieved 23 Aug 2010, from http://www.travelodge.co.uk/press_releases/press_release.php?id=393.
- Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Young, R. M. (1994). Mental space. London: Process Press Ltd.Google Scholar