Advertisement

Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 100–110 | Cite as

Associations Between Sexual Behavior, Sexual Attitudes, and Marital Horizons During Emerging Adulthood

Article

Abstract

Using a sample of 1,134 emerging adults, this study explores how the importance place on marriage, ideal marital timing, and criteria for marriage readiness varies by sexual experience. Sexual experience groups were created using cluster analysis techniques that incorporated both sexual behaviors and attitudes. Results from this study indicate that high rates of sexual experience were related to an increased personal belief that marriage is an important goal and a belief that being single holds more advantages over being married. Emerging adults with high rates of sexual experience were also more likely to believe that sexual experience and cohabitation are important criteria for marriage readiness.

Keywords

Sexual behavior Marriage Cohabitation Attitudes Emerging adulthood 

References

  1. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Do attitudes toward divorce affect marital quality? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour, S., & Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescent sexual debut and later delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnett, J. J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young people’s conceptions of the transition to adulthood. Youth & Society, 29, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busby, D. M., Carroll, J. S., & Willoughby, B. J. (2010). Compatibility or restraint?: The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 766–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, L. M. (2001). The ambiguity of “having sex”: The subjective experience of virginity loss in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. S., Badger, S., Willoughby, B. J., Nelson, L. J., Madsen, S., & Barry, C. M. (2009). Ready or not? Criteria for marriage readiness among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll, J. S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L. J., Barry, C. M., & Madsen, S. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence Research, 22(3), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Census Bureau, U. S. (2005). Statistical abstract of the United States, 2005. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Christopher, F. S., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeMaris, A., & Rao, V. (1992). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability in the United States: A reassessment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(1), 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donnelly, D., Burgess, E., Anderson, S., Davis, R., & Dillard, J. (2001). Involuntary celibacy: A life course analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dush, C. M., Cohan, C. L., & Amato, P. R. (2003). The relationship between cohabitation and marital quality and stability: Change across cohorts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia, L. T., & Markey, C. (2007). Matching in sexual experience for married, cohabitating, and dating couples. Journal of Sex Research, 44(3), 250–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodson, P., Suther, S., Pruitt, B. E., & Wilson, K. (2003). Defining abstinence: Views of directors, instructors, and participants in abstinence-only-until-marriage programs in Texas. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 91–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haffner, D. W. (1997). What’s wrong with abstinence-only sexuality education programs? SIECUS Report, 25, 9–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to the increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyde, J. S., DeLamater, J. D., Plant, E. A., & Byrd, J. M. (1996). Sexuality during pregnancy and the year postpartum. The Journal of Sex Research, 33, 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, P. B., & Richter, L. (2004). Research note: What if we’re wrong? Some possible implications of systematic distortions in adolescents’ self-reports of sensitive behaviors. Journal of Drug Issues, 34(4), 951–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaestle, C. E., & Halpern, C. T. (2007). What’s love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(3), 134–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, J. R., & London, K. A. (1991). Premarital sex and the risk of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(4), 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kline, G. H., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Olmos-Gallo, P. A., Peters, M. S., Whitton, S. W., et al. (2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation and increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(2), 311–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kudova, P., Rezankova, H., Husek, D., & Snasel, V. (2006). Categorical data clustering using statistical methods and neural networks. In Proceedings of the spring young researcher’s colloquium on database and information systems, Moscow.Google Scholar
  27. Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. The American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1811–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mosko, J. E., & Pistole, M. C. (2010). Attachment and religiousness: Contributions to young adult marital attitudes and readiness. The Family Journal, 18, 127–135.Google Scholar
  31. Netting, N. S., & Burnett, M. L. (2004). Twenty years of student sexual behavior: Subcultural adaptations to a changing health environment. Adolescence, 39, 19–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Paik, A. (2011). Adolescent sexuality and the risk of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 37(1), 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raley, R., Crissey, S., & Muller, C. (2007). Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1210–1226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scholly, K., Katz, A. R., Gascoigne, J., & Holck, P. S. (2005). Using social norms theory to explain perceptions and sexual health behaviors of undergraduate college students: An exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 53, 159–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spencer, L. H. (2007). Using cluster analysis to explore survey data. Nurse Researcher, 15(1), 37–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Treas, J. (2002). How cohorts, education, and ideology shaped a new sexual revolution on American attitudes toward nonmarital sex, 1972–1998. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wells, B. E., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Changes in young people’s sexual behavior and attitudes, 1943–1999: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. William T. Grant Foundation Commission on Work, Family, Citizenship. (1988). The forgotten half: Non-college bound youth in America. Washington, DC: William T. Grand Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2010). Sexual experience and couple formation attitudes among emerging adults. Journal of Adult Development, 17, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willoughby, B. J., & Dworkin, J. (2009). The relationships between emerging adults’ expressed desire to marry and frequency of participation in risk behaviors. Youth & Society, 40, 426–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Family LifeBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations