Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 114–121 | Cite as

Handwriting Difficulties and Their Assessment in Young Adults with DCD: Extension of the DASH for 17-to 25-Year-Olds

  • Anna L. Barnett
  • Sheila E. Henderson
  • Beverly Scheib
  • Joerg Schulz
Article

Abstract

Handwriting difficulties are common in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and frequently continue into adulthood. In spite of increased computer use, handwriting remains an essential everyday life skill. The Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting (DASH) provides an objective measure of handwriting performance for students aged 9–16 years. No equivalent test for adults exists. The aim of this study is to explore developmental trends beyond the age of 16 on the five tasks included in the DASH and to describe the employment of these data in an extension of the test for 17-to 25-year-olds (DASH 17+). A case study is included to illustrate its use in the assessment of young adults with DCD. Three hundred and ninety-three students between the ages of 17 and 25 completed the test. The sample was selected to represent the population of UK students in post-16 education. Statistically significant, but overall modest developmental trends in handwriting performance were found for all tasks. Depending on the task, the year-on-year average increase in performance followed a linear or non-linear trend. Gender effects were generally small. DASH 17+ will provide useful information on any individual whose handwriting is causing concern, including those with, or suspected of having DCD.

Keywords

Developmental coordination disorder Handwriting DASH Handwriting test Handwriting speed 

References

  1. APA. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, A., Henderson, S. E., Scheib, B., & Schulz, J. (2007). Detailed assessment of speed of handwriting (DASH). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, A. L., Henderson, S. E., Scheib, B., & Schulz, J. (2009). Development and standardisation of a new handwriting speed test: The DASH. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, 6, 137–157.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, A., Henderson, S. E., Scheib, B., & Schulz, J. (2010). Detailed assessment of speed of handwriting for 17–25 (DASH 17+). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
  5. Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency (2nd ed.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  6. Cousins, M., & Smyth, M. M. (2003). Developmental coordination impairments in adulthood. Human Movement Science, 22, 433–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Florey, K. B. (2009). Script and scribble: The rise and fall of handwriting. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, S., Berninger, V., Weintraub, N., & Shafer, W. (1998). The development of handwriting speed and legibility in grades 1 through 9. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007). Movement assessment battery for children [examiner’s manual] (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
  10. Killeen, H., Dempsey, M., & O’Mahony, P. (2006). The Irish adaptation of the handwriting speed test (IA) HST. Dublin: Ireland: The Association of Occupational Therapists of Ireland.Google Scholar
  11. Kirby, A., Edwards, L., Sugden, D., & Rosenblum, S. (2010). The development and standardization of the adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist (ADC). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 131–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Losse, A., Henderson, S. E., Elliman, D., Hall, D., Knight, E., & Jongmans, M. (1991). Clumsiness in children: Do they grow out of it? A ten year follow up study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 55–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mandich, A., Miller, L. T., Polatajko, H. J., & Missiuna, C. (2003). A cognitive perspective on handwriting: Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP). Handwriting Review, 2, 41–47.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, L., Polatajko, H. J., Mandich, A., & Missiuna, C. (2001). A pilot trial of a cognitive treatment for children with developmental coordination disorder. Comparison of cognitive and traditional approaches to treatment of DCD. Human Movement Science, 20, 183–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mogey, H., Sarab, G., Haywood, J., van Heyningen, S., Dewhurst, D., Hounsell, D., et al. (2008). The end of handwriting? Using computers in traditional essay examinations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Orton, S. T. (1937). Reading, writing and speed problems in children. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Rasmussen, P., & Gillberg, C. (2000). Perceptual, motor and attentional deficits in seven-year-old children: Pediatric aspects. Acta Paediatrica Scandanavia, 72, 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stainthorp, R., & Rauf, N. (2009). An investigation of the influence of the transcription skills of handwriting and spelling on the quality of text writing by girls and boys in Key Stage 2. Handwriting Today, 8, 8–13.Google Scholar
  19. Wallen, M., Bonney, M.-A., & Lennox, L. (1996). The handwriting speed test. Adelaide: Helios.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna L. Barnett
    • 1
  • Sheila E. Henderson
    • 2
  • Beverly Scheib
    • 2
  • Joerg Schulz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.School of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations