Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-Category Friendships and Postformal Thought among College Students

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories of postformal thought (PFT) suggest that cognitive development is enhanced by social interactions where differences must be negotiated. Friendships provide the potential for complex social interactions and are an ideal context in which to explore the relation between cognitive development and the negotiation of social differences. The present research is the first to directly explore the relation between close cross-category friendships and level of postformal cognitive reasoning among college students. Participants from two universities completed questionnaires assessing PFT and friendship characteristics. Results indicate that individuals reported more same-category versus cross-category friendships. This was true for sex, ethnicity, social class, sexual orientation, and age. In addition, individuals high in PFT had more social category differences in their existing close friendships than individuals low in PFT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonio, A. L. (2001). Diversity and the influence of friendship groups in college. The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidell, T. R., & Fisher, K. W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: Action, structure, and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, J. A., & Papalia, D. E. (1992). The study of adult cognition from a Piagetian perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canary, D. J., Emmers-Sommers, T. M., & Faulkner, S. (1997). Sex and gender differences in personal relationships. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, K. B., Galupo, M. P., Tyree, S., & Jennings, J. G. (2009). Reliability and validity of the complex postformal thought questionnaire: Assessing adults’ cognitive development. Journal of Adult Development, 16, 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development (Chapter 6) (pp. 161–196). NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). “It’s all in the family”: Intersections of gender, race and nation. In U. Narayan & S. Harding (Eds.), Decentering the center: Philosophy for a multicultural, postcolonial, and feminist world (pp. 156–176). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. (1991). Understanding relationships. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duster, T. (1991). The diversity project: Final report. Berkeley: Institute for the Study of Social Change, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galupo, M. P. (2007). Friendship patterns of sexual minority individuals in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galupo, M. P. (2009). Cross-category friendship patterns: Comparison of heterosexual and sexual minority adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 811–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galupo, M. P., Sailer, C. A., & St. John, S. C. (2004). Friendships across sexual orientation: Experiences of bisexual women in early adulthood. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galupo, M. P., & St. John, S. C. (2001). Benefits of cross-sexual orientation friendships among adolescent females. Journal of Adolescence, 24, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Rose, S. (1996). Friendships between African-American and white lesbians. In J. S. Weinstock & E. D. Rothblum (Eds.), Lesbian friendships (pp. 165–191). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R. (1989). The day-to-day functioning of close versus casual friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 61(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (1990). Modes of knowledge and the organization of development. In M. L. Commongs, C. Armon, L. Kohlberg, F. A. Richards, T. A. Grotzer, & J. D. Sinnott (Eds.), Adult development, Volume 2: Models and methods in the study of adolescent and adult thought (Chap. 3, pp. 43–62).

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (1992). A neo-Piagetian perspective on adult cognitive development. In R. J. Sternberg & C. A. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, S., & Howard, J. A. (1993). Solidarity and hierarchy in cross-sex friendships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21(7/8), 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1080–1094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. (Helen Weaver, Trans.). New York: Basic Books (Original work published 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. (1999). Navigating differences: Friendships between gay and straight men. New York: Harrington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. (1985). Same- and cross-sex friendships and the psychology of homosociality. Sex Roles, 12, 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., & Serafica, F. C. (1986). Keeping and ending casual, close and best friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(3), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J. D. (1998). The development of logic in adulthood: Postformal thought and its applications. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Berg, C. A. (1992). Intellectual development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1970). Friendship as a social institution. In G. McCall (Ed.), Social relationships. Aldine: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Paz Galupo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paz Galupo, M., Cartwright, K.B. & Savage, L.S. Cross-Category Friendships and Postformal Thought among College Students. J Adult Dev 17, 208–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9089-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-009-9089-4

Keywords

Navigation