Advertisement

Examining Mediators of the Link Between Generativity and Well-being

  • Veronika Huta
  • David C. Zuroff
Article

Abstract

Generativity involves raising and guiding the next generation, contributing to society, and creating new products and ideas. It has clearly been related to personal well-being, yet little is known about why this relationship exists. According to McAdams and de St. Aubin (J Pers Soc Psychol, 62:1003–1015, 1992), generativity is motivated by a desire for symbolic immortality, a need to be needed, and society’s expectation that one should be a contributing member. It was therefore hypothesized that the satisfaction of these variables would fully mediate the relationship between generativity and well-being. Structural equation modeling showed that symbolic immortality alone fully mediated the relationship.

Keywords

Generativity Adult development Well-being Symbolic immortality 

References

  1. Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults: Links to agency, communion, and subjective well-being. Aging and Human Development, 50, 17–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1993). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (3rd ed., pp. 115–160). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  5. de St Aubin, E., & McAdams, D. P. (1995). The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drolet, J. (1990). Transcending death during early adulthood: Symbolic immortality, death anxiety, and purpose in life. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 148–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  10. Florian, V., & Mikulincer, M. (1998). Symbolic immortality and the management of the terror of death: The moderating role of attachment style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 725–734.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Pursuing pleasure versus virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keyes, C. L. M., & Ryff, C. D. (1998). Generativity in adult lives: Social structural contours, quality of life consequences. In D. P. McAdams, & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 227–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Lifton, R. J. (1979). The broken connection: On death and the continuity of life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  16. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loscocco, K., & Spitze, G. (2007). Gender patterns in provider role attitudes and behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 934–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept. First- and higher- order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (1995). The relations of generative concern and generative action to personality traits, satisfaction/happiness with life, and ego development. Journal of Adult Development, 2, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson’s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
  26. Salari, S., & Zhang, W. (2006). Kin keepers and good providers: Influence of gender socialization on well-being among USA birth cohorts. Aging and Mental Health, 10, 485–496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schooler, J. W., Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). The pursuit of happiness can be self-defeating. In J. Carrillo, & I. Brocas (Eds.), Psychology and economics (pp. 41–70). Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93–159). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Stewart, A. J., Ostrove, J. M., & Helson, R. (2001). Middle aging in women: Patterns of personality change from the 30s to the 50s. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The Wisdom of the Ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Watson, D, Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in PsychologyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations