Inclusive Preschool Practitioners’ Implementation of Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Intervention Using Telehealth Training
This single-case investigation was designed to evaluate the effects of telehealth training on practitioner implementation of a naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention (NDBI). Six general education preschool practitioners engaged in an intervention with six children with varying disabilities in inclusive classroom settings. The telehealth training package included a collaborative approach to intervention planning, online training module, video self-evaluation, and performance feedback via videoconferencing. Following telehealth training, practitioners reached criteria for implementation fidelity and increased communication opportunities. Additionally, child participants increased communication behaviors above baseline levels. All behaviors generalized to a different activity context and maintained over time. Social validity was measured and results suggest high levels of acceptability for the telehealth training package.
KeywordsTelehealth Preschool Inclusion Naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention Single-case design
The authors would like to acknowledge that this manuscript was prepared from the first author’s doctoral dissertation. Research enhancement funds from Michigan State University partially supported technology purchases for this dissertation research. The authors would also like to thank the participants and education professionals for their collaboration and support of this study.
SRD conceived of the study, participated in the design and coordination, conducted all intervention sessions, analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted and revised the entire manuscript. SND participated in the design, assisted in data analyzation, and helped to draft and revise the manuscript. EH was the secondary coder of data and helped draft and revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved of the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Michigan State University institutional research committee (STUDY00000919) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained for all individual participants included in this study.
- Amsbary, J., & AFIRM Team. (2017). Naturalistic intervention. Chapel Hill, NC: National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder, FPG Child Development Center, University of North Carolina. Retrieved September 4, 2018 from http://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/Naturalistic-intervention.
- Barton, E. E., Lloyd, B. P., Spriggs, A. D., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Visual analysis of graphic data. In Single case research methodology (pp. 179–214). Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bzoch, K. R., League, R., & Brown, V. L. (2003). Receptive-expressive emergent language test third edition (REEL-3). St. Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Carter, S. (2010). The social validity manual: A guide to subjective evaluation of behavioral interventions. Boston, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ferguson, J., Craig, E., & Dounavi, K. (2018). Telehealth as a model for providing behaviour analytic interventions to individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,49, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3724-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fischer, A. J., Dart, E. H., Radley, K. C., Richardson, D., Clark, R., & Wimberly, J. (2016). An evaluation of the effectiveness and acceptability of teleconsultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,27, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2016.1235978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gebbie, D., Ceglowski, D., Taylor, L., & Miels, J. (2012). The role of teacher efficacy in strengthening classroom support for preschool children with disabilities who exhibit challenging behaviors. Early Childhood Education Journal,40, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0486-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2013). Autism spectrum rating scales: ASRS. North Tonawanda (NY): MHS.Google Scholar
- Ingersoll, B., & Berger, N. (2015). Parent engagement with a telehealth-based parent-mediated intervention program for children with autism spectrum disorders: Predictors of program use and parent outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research,17, 227–245. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2006). Pivotal response treatments for autism: Communication, social & academic development. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
- Neely, L., Rispoli, M., Gerow, S., Hong, E., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2017). Fidelity outcomes for autism-focused interventionists coached via telepractice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities,29, 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-017-9550-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Odom, S. L., & Bailey, D. (2001). Inclusive preschool programs: Classroom ecology and child outcomes. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 253–276). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
- Reichow, B. (2011). Development, procedures, and application of the evaluative method for determining evidence-based practices in autism. In B. Reichow, P. Doehring, D. V. Cicchetti, & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 25–39). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schreibman, L., Dawson, G., Stahmer, A. C., Landa, R., Rogers, S., McGee, G., et al. (2015). Naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions: Empirically validated treatments for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,45, 2411–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2407-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Secord, W., & Donohue, J. S. (2014). CAAP-2: Clinical assessment of articulation and phonology-2. Greenville: Super Duper Publications.Google Scholar
- Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighbourhoods. The science of early childhood development. Washington DC: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Suhrheinrich, J., Chan, J., Melgarejo, M., Reith, S., Stahmer, A., & AFIRM Team. (2018). Pivotal response training. Chapel Hill, NC: National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorder, FPG Child Development Center, University of North Carolina. Retrieved September 4, 2018 from http://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/Pivotal-response-training.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2018). Annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Wainer, A., Pickard, K., & Ingersoll, B. (2017). Using web-based instruction, brief workshops, and remote consultation to teach community-based providers a parent-mediated intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies,26, 1592–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0671-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walls, S. (2007). Early childhood preservice training and perceived teacher efficacy beliefs concerning the inclusion of young children with disabilities. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
- Wong, C., Odom, S., Hume, K., Cox, A., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., et al. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2012). Preschool language scale (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar