Advertisement

Empathy and a Personalised Approach in Autism

  • Richard WoodsEmail author
  • Krysia Emily Waldock
  • Nathan Keates
  • Hayley Morgan
Letter to the Editor

Introduction

A recent literature review of empathy and autism claims to highlight clinical nature and understandings of empathy in autism. The author acknowledges the method utilised may miss relevant scholarship, simultaneously argues the review can inform therapies. Later, they suggest a personalised approach is more helpful than the spectrum approach to autism (Harmsen 2019). Firstly, we challenge contentious topics in the review. Secondly, we seek to fill gaps in the review, thus, combining to allow a personalised and empathetic approach to autism.

The article refers to various dated clinical language, primarily autism subtypes, referring to differences between categories (Harmsen 2019). However, for such practices has been falling out of favour for almost a decade, since the replacing of autism subtypes with one blanket autism spectrum disorder in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) (Happé 2011). Autism subtypes do not hold up in...

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article received no funding. We thank Dr Nick Chown, Dr Brett Heasman and Dr Noah Sasson for their advice on production of this article. All authors contributed equally to the production of this article.

References

  1. Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, H. (2019). Doing things together: Exploring meanings of different forms of sociality among autistic people in an autistic work space. European Journal of Disability Research, 13(3), 168–178. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875067217300524?via%3Dihub#! CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chown, N. (2019). Are the “autistic traits” and “broader autism phenotype” concepts real or mythical? Autism Policy and Practice, 2(1), 46–63. http://openaccessautism.org/index.php/app/article/view/19
  3. Chown, N., & Beardon, L. (2017). Autism theory. In F. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102224-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fletcher‐Watson, S., McConnell, F., Manola, E., & McConachie, H. (2014). Interventions based on the theory of mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2014(3), CD008785.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Happé, F. (2011). Criteria, categories, and continua: Autism and related disorders in DSM-5. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(6), 540–542. https://www.jaacap.org/article/S0890-8567%2811%2900268-1/abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harmsen, I. (2019). Empathy in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,49(10), 3939–3955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hens, K. (2019). The many meanings of autism: conceptual and ethical reflections. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,61(9), 1025–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14278.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapp, S. (2019). How social deficit models exacerbate the medical model: Autism as case in point. Autism Policy and Practice, 2(1), 3–28. https://www.openaccessautism.org/index.php/app/article/view/16
  9. Krahn, T. M., & Fenton, A. (2012). The extreme male brain theory of autism and the potential adverse effects for boys and girls with autism. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry,9(1), 93–103.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-011-9350-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mandy, W. (2019). Social camouflaging in autism: Is it time to lose the mask? Autism,23(8), 1879–1881.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319878559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Milton, D., Heasman, B., & Sheppard, E. (2018). Double empathy. In F. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6435-8_102273-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicolaidis, C., Milton, D., Sasson, N. J., Sheppard, E., & Yergeau, M. (2018). An expert discussion on autism and empathy. Autism in adulthood,1(1), 4–11.  https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2018.29000.cjn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pickles, A., Le Couteur, A., Leadbitter, K., Salomone, E., Cole-Fletcher, R., Tobin, H., Gammer, I.,…Green, J. (2016). Parent-mediated social communication therapy for young children with autism (PACT): Long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 388, 2501–09. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31229-6/fulltext CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reichow, B., Hume, K., Barton, E., & Boyd, B. (2018). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018(5). Art. No.: CD009260. https://www.cochrane.org/CD009260/BEHAV_early-intensive-behavioral-intervention-eibi-increasing-functional-behaviors-and-skills-young
  15. Ridley, R. (2019). Some difficulties behind the concept of the ‘Extreme male brain’ in autism research. A theoretical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 57, 19–27. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750946718301417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rynkiewicz, A., Schuller, B., Marchi, E., Piana, S., Camurri, A., Lasalle, A., et al. (2016). An investigation of the ‘female camouflage effect’ in autism using a computerized ADOS-2 and a test of sex/gender differences. Molecular Autism,7(10), 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-016-0073-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas, B., Marjorie, H., Charlop, N., Lim, N., & Gumaer, C. (2019). Measuring happiness behavior in functional analyses of challenging behavior for children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Modification.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519878673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wood, R. (2019). Autism, intense interests and support in school: from wasted efforts to shared understandings. Educational Review.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woods, R. (2019). Demand avoidance phenomena: Circularity, integrity and validity - a commentary on the 2018 National Autistic Society PDA conference. Good Autism Practice, 20(2), 28–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Tizard Centre, University of KentCanterburyUK
  3. 3.Swansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations