Advertisement

Comparing the Psychometric Properties of the Self- and Parent-Report Versions of Autism-Spectrum Quotient-Adult in Hong Kong (AQ-Adult-HK)

  • Vitti W. K. Poon
  • Dorothy S. T. Shu
  • Raymond W. S. Chan
  • Cecilia N. W. Leung
  • Patrick W. L. LeungEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The Autism-Spectrum Quotient-Adult (AQ-Adult) is a screening tool for adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Chinese self- and parent-report versions of the AQ-Adult in Hong Kong (AQ-Adult-HK). Participants included adults with ASD (n = 27) and community controls (n = 345). Parents of a subset of adults with ASD (n = 21) and controls (n = 87) also participated as informants. The parent-report version showed significantly stronger psychometric properties, including a larger area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and higher sensitivity/specificity, than those of the self-report version. The stronger psychometric properties of the former were related to its significantly higher ratings of ASD symptoms in the ASD adults.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) AQ-Adult-HK Parent-report Self-report Chinese 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This Project was supported by the Department of Psychology from the Chinese University of Hong Kong. We are extremely grateful to Dr. Rachel Poon, Ms. Michelle Liu, Mr. Daniel Chan, Ms. Veronica Wai and especially our participants who made this project possible.

Author Contributions

PL and RC conceived, designed and supervised this study. VP and DS participated in its design and planning, and were responsible for data collection, data analysis and initial manuscript preparation. CL finalized data analysis and performed manuscript revision. PL finalized the manuscript.

Funding

This study did not receive any financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in compliance with the Ethical Standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed written consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in this study.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition. Washington, DC: APA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, E. J. (2005). Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Allison, C. (2008). The autism spectrum quotient: Children’s version (AQ-Child). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1230–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., Hoekstra, R. A., Knickmeyer, R., & Wheelwright, S. (2006). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ)-adolescent version. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, R. W. S., Leung, C. N. W., Ng, D. C. Y., & Yau, S. S. W. (2018). Validating a culturally-sensitive Social Competence Training Programme for Adolescents with ASD in a Chinese context: An initial investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(2), 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dritschel, B., Wisely, M., Goddard, L., Robinson, S., & Howlin, P. (2010). Judgements of self-understanding in adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Autism, 14(5), 509–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoekstra, R. A., Bartels, M., Cath, D. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): A study in Dutch population and patient groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1555–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurst, R. M., Mitchell, J. T., Kimbrel, N. A., Kwapil, T. K., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2007). Examination of the reliability and factor structure of the autism spectrum quotient (AQ) in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1938–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, S. A., Filliter, J. H., & Murphy, R. R. (2009). Discrepancies between self- and parent-perceptions of autistic traits and empathy in high functioning children and adolescents on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1706–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kloosterman, P. H., Keefer, K. V., Kelley, E. A., Summerfeldt, L. J., & Parker, J. D. A. (2011). Evaluation of the factor structure of the autism-spectrum quotient. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai, K. Y., Leung, P. W., Mo, F. Y., Lee, M. M., Shea, C. K., Chan, G. F.,…,Skuse, D. (2015). Validation of the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di) among Chinese children in a child psychiatry clinic in Hong Kong. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1230–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lau, W. Y., Gau, S. S., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the autism spectrum quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lepage, J. F., Lortie, M., Taschereau-Dumouchel, V., & Théoret, H. (2009). Validation of French–Canadian versions of the empathy quotient and autism spectrum quotient. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 272–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pan, P. C., & Goldberg, D. P. (1990). A comparison of the validity of GHQ-12 and CHQ-12 in Chinese primary care patients in Manchester. Psychological Medicine, 20, 931–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skuse, D., Pickles, A., Charman, T., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., & Baird, G. (2004). The developmental, dimensional and diagnostic interview (3Di): A novel computerized assessment for autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 548–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stewart, M. E., & Austin, E. J. (2009). The structure of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from a student-sample in Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Uchiyama, T., Yoshida, Y., Tojo, Y., Kuroda, M., et al. (2007). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) children’s version in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(3), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Tojo, Y. (2006). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-3rd Edition (Chinese Version). Taipei: Chinese Behavioural Science Corporation (Copyright The Psych Corp, USA).Google Scholar
  21. Woodbury-Smith, M., Robinson, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). Screening adults for Asperger Syndrome using the AQ: Diagnostic validity in clinical practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, L., Sun, Y., Chen, F., Wu, D., Tang, J., Han, X., et al. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient in both clinical and non-clinical samples: Chinese version for mainland China. BMC Psychiatry, 16, 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vitti W. K. Poon
    • 1
  • Dorothy S. T. Shu
    • 1
  • Raymond W. S. Chan
    • 2
  • Cecilia N. W. Leung
    • 2
  • Patrick W. L. Leung
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.The Jockey Club iREACH Social Competence Development and Employment Support CenterNew Life Psychiatric Rehabilitation AssociationHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations